The authors describe a promising approach to engaging high school students in intergroup dialogues, relying on “near peers” — in this case, local college students — to facilitate a series of classroom discussions about racial identity, differences, and opportunities to connect. Early results suggest that the approach had significant benefits for all participants. The high school students deepened their ability to think critically about racial issues and listen actively to others’ opinions, and the college students reported increased compassion, efficacy, and confidence as change agents. Further, even though their role was just to observe the dialogues, the cooperating teachers reported that they learned new facilitation skills and became more willing to address racial issues in the classroom.

Adams, M. (2007). Pedagogical frameworks for social justice education. In Adams, M., Bell, L.A., Griffin, P. (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (2nd ed.) New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Crocco, M. (2017, 3 21). Personal interview.
Google Scholar
Delpit, L. (2006). Other people’s children. New York, NY: The New Press.
Google Scholar
East Lansing High School (ELHS) . (2016). School improvement plan. East Lansing, MI: Advance Education Inc.
Google Scholar
Griffin, S.R. (2015). Those kids, our schools: Race and reform in an American high school. Cambridge MA: Harvard Education Press.
Google Scholar
Gurin, P., Nagda, B.A., Zúñiga, X. (2013). Dialogue across difference: Practice, theory, and research on intergroup dialogue. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar
Gurin, P., Nagda, B.A., Sorensen, N. (2011). Intergroup dialogue: Education for a broad conception of civic engagement. Liberal Education, 97 (2), 4651.
Google Scholar
Hopkins, L.E., Dominguez, A.D. (2015). From awareness to action: College students’ skill development in intergroup dialogue. Equity and Excellence in Education, 48 (3), 392402.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lynch, I., Swartz, S., Isaacs, D. (2017). Antiracism oral education: A review of approaches, impact, and theoretical underpinnings from 2000 to 2015. Journal of Moral Education, 46 (2), 129144.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Maxwell, K.E., Fisher, R.A., Thompson, M.C., Beling, C. (2011). Integrating cognitive and affective learning. In Maxwell, K.E., Nagda, B.A., Thompson, M.C. (Eds.), Facilitating intergroup dialogues: Bridging differences, catalyzing change. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
Google Scholar
Maxwell, L. (2014, 8 19). U.S. school enrollment hits majority-minority milestone. Education Week.
Google Scholar
Mitchell, D., Hinueber, J., Edwards, B. (2017). Looking race in the face. Phi Delta Kappan, 98 (5), 2429.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Pollock, M. (2004). Colormute: Race talk dilemmas in an American school. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Zúñiga, X., Lopez, G., Ford, K. (2012). Intergroup dialogue: Critical conversations about difference, social identities, and social justice: Guest editors’ introduction. Equity and Excellence in Education, 45 (1), 113.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Zúñiga, X., Nagda, B.A., Chesler, M., Cytron-Walker, A. (2007). Intergroup dialogue in higher education: Meaningful learning about social justice. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 32 (4). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

PDK-article-ppv for $5.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0