As the Every Student Succeeds Act is returning authority over teacher evaluation policies back to the states, policy makers at the state level have the opportunity to revise their policies. But who will they listen to when it comes to potential reforms? The author surveyed education policy makers to determine to what degree teachers, education leaders, and the general public are likely to influence their decisions. Their responses revealed that policy makers value voices of constituents over those of the general public, that Democrats and Republicans respond differently to teacher preferences, that responses to individual teacher voices are different from responses to union voices, and that school leaders voices are valued by almost all policy makers.

American Association of Colleges of Teachers Education [AACTE] . (1990). Teacher education policy in the states: A 50-state survey of legislative and administrative actions. Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
Ballou, D. (2000). Teacher contracts in Massachusetts. Boston, MA: Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research.
Google Scholar
Cohen-Vogel, L., Osborne-Lampkin, L. (2007). Allocating quality: Collective bargaining agreements and administrative discretion over teacher assignment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43 (4), 433461.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Education Next .2013 Education Next — Program on Education Policy and Governance — Survey 2013. Cambridge, MA: Author. http://educationnext.org/files/2013ednextpoll.pdf
Google Scholar
Education Week Research Center . (2017, 12). Educator political perceptions: A national survey. Bethesda, MD: Author.
Google Scholar
Finger, L.K. (2017). Vested interests and the diffusion of education policy reform across the states. Policy Studies Journal.
Google Scholar | Medline
Giroux, H. (2013). Neoliberalism’s war against teachers in dark times. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 13 (6), 458468.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Goldstein, D. (2015). The teacher wars: A history of America’s most embattled profession. New York, NY: Anchor Books.
Google Scholar
Hannaway, J., Rotherham, A.J. (Eds.). (2006). Collective bargaining in education: Negotiating change in today’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Google Scholar
Hanushek, E. (2011). The “war on teachers” is a myth. Hoover Digest, 1.
Google Scholar
Hawley, W.D. (1990). Systematic analysis, public policy making, and teacher education. In Houston, W. (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 136156). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Hess, F.M. (2002). School boards at the dawn of the 21st century: Conditions and challenges of district governance. Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association.
Google Scholar
Hungerford, N.J., Blom, M.C. (2014). Collective bargaining and the negotiation process: A primer for school board negotiators. Washington, DC: National School Boards Association & Council of School Attorneys.
Google Scholar
Jean-Marie, G., Normore, A.H., Brooks, J.S. (2009). Leadership for social justice: Preparing 21st century school leaders for a new social order. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 4 (1), 131.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Lieberman, M. (1997). The teachers unions. New York, NY: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Moe, T.M. (2002). Political control and the power of the agent. Paper presented at the Conference for Controlling the Bureaucracy, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX.
Google Scholar
Moe, T.M. (2011). Special interest: Teachers unions and America’s public schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Google Scholar
Sawchuk, S. (2016). Law could spur change in teacher requirements. Education Week, 35 (15), 1415.
Google Scholar
Strunk, K.O. (2012). Policy poison or promise? Exploring the dual nature of California school district collective bargaining agreements. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48 (3), 506547.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wong, A . (2015, 12 9). The bloated rhetoric of No Child Left Behind’s demise. The Atlantic.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

PDK-article-ppv for $5.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0