The authors describe the politicization of the process to revise Michigan’s social studies standards from 2005 to the present. In 2005, critics objected to the omission of topics they considered important, even though the content expectations document was not intended to be an exhaustive list of material to be covered. The latest, more limited revision, is being criticized for its leftward political leanings. The authors suggest that critics lack the expertise in the subject matter and that it is dangerous to let politically motivated non-experts make curricular decisions.

Colbeck, P. (2015). Table 1. Analysis of proposed MI social studies standards. www.senatorpatrickcolbeck.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/New-Standards-Review-Table.pdf
Google Scholar
Controversy swirls around what to teach in U.S. history . (2006, 7 2). Flint Journal.
Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2017). Teaching revolution, reform, and rebellion (and those who would seek to prevent it). In Andrews, G.P., Wangdi, Y.D. (Eds.), The role of agency and memory in historical understanding: Revolution, reform, and rebellion (pp. 206220). New Castle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Google Scholar
Gray, K. (2017, 10 11). GOP leadership kicks state Sen. Patrick Colbeck off 4 committees. Detroit Free Press. www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2017/10/11/michigan-senator-patrick-colbeck%20committees/753749001
Google Scholar
Hess, F.M. (2018, 1 4). Give the College Board credit for acting on conservatives’ concerns. National Review. www.nationalreview.com/2018/01/college-board-advanced-placement-european-history-framework-revised-version-conservatives-complain
Google Scholar
Higgins, L. (2016, 5 18). Michigan students sliding fast toward the bottom. Detroit Free Press. www.freep.com/story/news/education/2016/05/18/michigan-students-slidingtoward-bottom/84535876
Google Scholar
Hinkley, J.A. (2015, 5 22). An F in civil rights education: Michigan to revamp lessons. Free Press. www.freep.com/story/news/2015/05/22/michigan-civil-rights-education/27781257
Google Scholar
Littlefield, C. (2015, 7 30). Revised U.S. history curriculum addresses criticism, but conservatives still object. Los Angeles Times. www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-ap-us-history-20150730-story.html
Google Scholar
Mount Clemens takes a stand against ban on ‘America.’ (2006, 6 28) Mount Clemens Clinton-Harrison Journal.
Google Scholar
Nash, G.B. (1997). Reflections on the national history standards. National Forum, 77 (3), 14.
Google Scholar
Nash, G.B., Crabtree, C.A., Dunn, R.E. (2000). History on trial: Culture wars and the teaching of the past. New York: Vintage Books.
Google Scholar
Patriot week events focus on history, spirit . (2010, 9 8) Oakland Press.
Google Scholar
Reed Amar, A. (2005). America’s constitution: A biography. New York: Random House.
Google Scholar
Sieff, K. (2010, 10 20). Virginia 4th-grade textbook criticized over claims on black Confederate soldiers. Washington Post. www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/10/19/AR2010101907974.html
Google Scholar
Warren, M. (2007). America’s survival guide: How to stop American’s impending suicide by reclaiming our first principles and history. Minneapolis, MN: Mill City Press.
Google Scholar
Warren, W.J., Andrews, G.P., Cousins, J.P. (2017). Historians need to collaborate with K-12 educators more than ever. Teaching History: A Journal of Methods, 42 (1), 3646.
Google Scholar
Will plan for social studies survive? (2007, 5 3) Detroit News.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

PDK-article-ppv for $5.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0