In a recent qualitative coaching study of a single district, Evthokia Stephanie Saclarides and Sarah Theule Lubienski observed tensions within a coaching structure in which teachers had to be the ones to initiate professional development with a coach. Specifically, the Teacher’s Choice structure heightened coaches’ difficulties gaining access to teachers’ classrooms, which led the coaches to position themselves as trustworthy peers and avoid difficult conversations. The authors recommend that districts adopt a blended approach where teachers set their own learning agendas but coaches can also initiate professional development with teachers.

Camburn, E.M., Kimball, S.M., Lowenhaupt, R. (2008). Going to scale with teacher leadership: Lessons learned from a districtwide literacy coach initiative. In Mangin, M.M., Stoelinga, S.R. (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 2344). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Coburn, C.E., Russell, J.L. (2008). District policy and teachers’ social networks. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30 (3), 203235.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Knight, J. (2007). Instructional coaching: A partnership approach to improving instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar
Lieberman, A., Pointer Mace, D.H. (2008). Teacher learning: The key to educational reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (3), 226234.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Lord, B., Cress, K., Miller, B. (2008). Teacher leadership in support of large-scale mathematics and science education reform. In Mangin, M.M., Stoelinga, S.R. (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 5576). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Mangin, M.M. (2005). Distributed leadership and the culture of schools: Teacher leaders’ strategies for gaining access to classrooms. Journal of School Leadership, 15 (4), 456.
Google Scholar
Matsumura, L.C., Sartoris, M., Bickel, D.D., Garnier, H.E. (2009). Leadership for literacy coaching: The principal’s role in launching a new coaching program. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45 (5), 655693.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Saclarides, E. S. (2018). Co-teaching and modeling: The work of coaches and teachers as they engage in one-on-one mathematics professional development (Doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Google Scholar
Saclarides, E.S., Lubienski, S.T. (2018, April). Exploring the content and depth of coach-teacher talk during modeling and co-teaching. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Google Scholar
Sailors, M., Price, L. (2015). Support for the Improvement of Practices through Intensive Coaching (SIPIC): A model of coaching for improving reading instruction and reading achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 115127.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

PDK-article-ppv for $5.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0