Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online May 1, 2012

Second Language Listening and Unfamiliar Proper Names: Comprehension Barrier?

Abstract

This study examines whether unfamiliar proper names affect English as a second language (ESL) learners’ listening comprehension. A total of 110 intermediate to advanced ESL learners participated; comprehension of a short news text was tested under two conditions, Names Known (all proper names pre-taught in advance) and Names Unknown (all proper names unfamiliar prior to listening). The Names Known group performed significantly better than the Names Unknown group on two measures, true-false-don’t know statements and open-ended questions. The effect of unfamiliar proper names on comprehension remained statistically significant after the listening proficiency variable was controlled. Listeners in the Names Unknown treatment were able to derive 44.8% of information about the referents of proper names from context but they could not identify all the referents successfully. Unfamiliar proper names evidently hinder comprehension, which was also supported by the participants’ task difficulty ratings. When proper names were familiar, participants rated all comprehension tasks as easier to do and self-reported higher comprehension success. In contrast, when proper names were unfamiliar, participants rated all comprehension tasks as harder to do and self-reported a lower amount of comprehension.
It has long been established that vocabulary knowledge is a prerequisite to successful comprehension. This study confirms that, similarly to common vocabulary, the presence of unfamiliar proper names decreases the ESL learners’ chances of understanding spoken English. Implications of the findings for second language learning and testing are discussed.
It is recommended that teachers be flexible when setting up listening exercises and use different techniques depending on the depth of understanding the learners are supposed to achieve. If the instructional goal is listening for gist, proper names will unlikely affect the outcomes of the activity. However, if detailed and precise understanding is required, then it is unrealistic to expect ESL listeners to cope with unfamiliar proper names ‘on the spot’ without assistance or preparation. It is also advisable to avoid unfamiliar proper names in a testing situation because they may cause unwarranted anxiety and reflect negatively on the ESL listeners’ performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Ames WS (1966) The development of a classification scheme of contextual aids. Reading Research Quarterly 2(1): 57-82.
Anderson-Hsieh J, Koehler K (1988) The effects of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning 38(4): 561-613.
Arcario P (1990) Criteria for selecting video materials. In: Stempleski S, Arcario P (eds) Video in Second Language Teaching: Using, Selecting and Producing Video for the Classroom. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Inc, 109-21.
Berezowski L (2001) Articles and Proper Names. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Blau EK (1982) The effect of syntax on readability for ESL students in Puerto Rico. TESOL Quarterly 16(4): 517-28.
Bonk WJ (2000) Second language lexical knowledge and listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening 14: 14-31.
Brindley G (1998) Assessing listening abilities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 18: 171-91.
Buck G (2001) Assessing Listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns MK, Dean VJ, Foley S (2004) Preteaching unknown key words with incremental rehearsal to improve reading fluency and comprehension with children identified as reading disabled. Journal of School Psychology 42(4): 303-14.
Chiang CS, Dunkel P (1992) The effect of speech modification, prior knowledge, and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly 26(2): 34574.
Elkhafaifi H (2005) Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom. The Modern Language Journal 89(2): 206-20.
Francis WN, Kučera H (1982) Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Freedle R, Kostin I (1999) Does text matter in a multiple-choice test of comprehension? The case for the construct validity of TOEFL’s minitalks. Language Testing 16(1): 2-32.
Griffiths R (1992) Speech rate and listening comprehension: further evidence of the relationship. TESOL Quarterly 26(2): 385-91.
Hirai A (1999) The relationship between listening and reading rates of Japanese EFL learners. The Modern Language Journal 83(3): 367-84.
Hirsh D, Nation ISP (1992) What vocabulary size is needed to read unsimplified texts for pleasure? Reading in a Foreign Language 8(2): 689-96.
Hu MH, Nation ISP (2000) Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 13(1): 403-30.
Hung HCM (2007) Split attention in reading comprehension: a case of English as a second/foreign language. Master’s thesis. The University of New South Wales, Sydney.
IELTS Specimen Materials April (1995) (updated November 1997). UCLES [University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate], the British Council, IDP Education Australia.
Jung EH (2003) The role of discourse signalling cues in second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal 87(4): 562-77.
Kameenui EJ, Carnine DW, Freschi R (1982) Effects of text construction and instructional procedures for teaching word meanings on comprehension and recall. Reading Research Quarterly 27(3): 367-88.
Kelly P (1991) Lexical ignorance: the main obstacle to listening comprehension with advanced foreign language learners. IRAL 29(2): 135-49.
Kintsch W, Kozminsky E (1977) Summarizing stories after reading and listening. Journal of Educational Psychology 69(5): 491-99.
Laufer B (1989) What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In: Laurén C, Nordman M (eds) Special Language: from Humans Thinking to Thinking Machines. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 316-23.
Laufer B, Nation ISP (1995) Vocabulary size and use: lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied Linguistics 16(3): 30722.
Laufer B, Sim D (1985a) Taking the easy way out: non-use and misuse of clues in EFL reading. English Teaching Forum 23(2): 7-10, 20.
Laufer B, Sim D (1985b) Measuring and explaining the reading threshold needed for English for Academic Purposes texts. Foreign Language Annals 18(5): 405-11.
Liu N, Nation ISP (1985) Factors affecting guessing vocabulary in context. RELC Journal 16(1): 33-42.
Long DR (1990) What you don’t know can’t help you: an exploratory study of background knowledge and second language listening comprehension. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12: 65-80.
Lund RJ (1991) A comparison of second language listening and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal 75(2): 196-204.
Markham P, Latham M (1987) The influence of religion-specific background knowledge on the listening comprehension of adult second-language students. Language Learning 37(2): 157-70.
Matsuura H (2007) Intelligibility and individual learner differences in the EIL context. System 35(3): 293-304.
Napoli E (1997) Names, indexicals, and identity statements. In: Künne W, Newen A, Anduschus M (eds) Direct Reference, Indexicality, and Propositional Attitudes. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 185-211.
Nation ISP (2006) How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? The Canadian Modern Language Review 63(1): 59-82.
Nuttall CE, Alderson CJ (1996) Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language. Oxford: Heinemann English Language Teaching.
Olsen LA, Huckin TN (1990) Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes 9(1): 33-47.
Sanders JR (1973) Retention effects of adjunct questions in written and aural discourse. Journal of Educational Psychology 65(2): 181-86.
Sarig G (1989) Testing meaning construction: can we do it fairly? Language Testing 6(1): 77-94.
Schmidt-Rinehart BC (1994) The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. The Modern Language Journal 78(2): 179-89.
Sherman J (1997) The effect of question preview in listening comprehension tests. Language Testing 14(2): 185-213.
Shohamy E, Inbar O (1991) Validation of listening comprehension tests: the effect of text and question type. Language Testing 8(1): 23-40.
Stahl SA, Fairbanks MM (1986) The effects of vocabulary instruction: a model-based meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 56(1): 72-110.
Walker L (1976) Comprehending writing and spontaneous speech. Reading Research Quarterly 11(2): 144-67.
Weir CJ (1993) Understanding and Developing Language Tests. London: Prentice Hall International.
West M (1953) A General Service List of English Words. London: Longman, Green & Co.
Wixson KK (1986) Vocabulary instruction and children’s comprehension of basal stories. Reading Research Quarterly 21(3): 317-29.
Wu Y (1998) What do tests of listening comprehension test? A retrospection study of EFL test-takers performing a multiple-choice task. Language Testing 15(1): 21-44.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: May 1, 2012
Issue published: April 2012

Keywords

  1. proper names
  2. proper nouns
  3. listening comprehension
  4. adequate comprehension
  5. comprehension testing
  6. English as a second language
  7. vocabulary learning
  8. vocabulary threshold

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2012.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Polina P. Kobeleva
School of Information and Social Sciences, Open Polytechnic, New Zealand

Notes

Polina P. Kobeleva, School of Information and Social Sciences, Open Polytechnic, 3 Cleary Street, Lower Hutt 5011, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in RELC Journal.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 572

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 18

  1. Learners’ cognitive processing problems during comprehension as a basi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Quantifying proper nouns’ influence on L2 English learners’ reading fl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. TED Ed for Incidental L2 Academic Vocabulary Learning: A Corpus-Driven...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Incidental vocabulary acquisition from listening to English teacher ed...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Is “general” easier than “academic”? A corpus-based investigation into...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Proper name theory and implications for second language reading
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A Study on Roles of Proper Names in Movie English
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Vocabulary Demands of Informal Spoken English Revisited: What Does It ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. How does digital context influence interaction in large live online le...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. A Hard Science Spoken Word List
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Academic Spoken Vocabulary in TED Talks: Implications for Academic Lis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. A Mixed Methods Genre Analysis of the Discussion Section of MMR Articl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. A Hard Science Spoken Word List
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Taking a Leaf Out of a Review: The Asymmetrical Link Between Linguisti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. The Academic Spoken Word List
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Lexical Coverage of TED Talks: Implication...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Syntactic and Lexical Complexity of B2 Listening Comprehension Subtest...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Making and Using Word Lists for Language Learning and Testing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text