Lease it or lose it? The implications of New York’s Land Lease Initiative for public housing preservation
Abstract
Urban scholars frequently call for equitable and inclusive growth to create more just cities but this vision has proven elusive in urban development – especially involving low-income communities and affordable housing. In 2013, the New York City Housing Authority proposed to leverage private development to benefit low-income residents by supporting market-rate residential construction on open space in public housing sites to pay for needed improvements to subsidised units. The Land Lease Initiative was a seemingly win-win plan but quickly faced backlash from multiple quarters. Using interviews with key housing authority officials and analysis of plan documents and media coverage, we show how the content and framing of the plan stoked fears of displacement, despite stated intentions. Our analysis reveals that criticism overlooked four unconventional ideas for preserving public housing, which are embedded in the plan: (1) retaining all public housing units and high-rise public housing towers on site, as opposed to demolishing them; (2) deconcentrating poverty by increasing residential density, instead of displacing poor residents; (3) adding affordable housing units to the site of low-income public housing; and (4) creating mixed-income communities around buildings, in addition to within them. The findings suggest that the future of affordable housing in the neoliberal era involves blurring the line between preservation and privatisation.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Angotti T (2013) Stop NYCHA infill plan, save public housing. City Limits, 9 May.
Bloom ND (2008) Public Housing that Worked: New York in the Twentieth Century. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bloom ND (2012) Learning from New York: America’s alternative high-rise public housing model. Journal of the American Planning Association 78(4): 418–431.
Bloomberg MR (2013) Letter to Ms Gigi Li. Office of the Mayor, 15 March.
Brash J (2011) Bloomberg’s New York: Class and Governance in the Luxury City. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Brash J (2011) Bloomberg’s New York: Class and Governance in the Luxury City. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Brewer GA (2014) Testimony to the NYC Housing Authority on the FY2015 Annual Plan and significant amendments to the FY2014 Annual Plan. New York City Manhattan Borough President’s Office, 24 July.
Briquelet K (2013) Upper West Side condo has separate entrances for rich and poor. New York Post, 18 August.
Chaskin R, Joseph M (2010) Building ‘community’ in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches, and early experiences. Urban Affairs Review 45(3): 299–335.
Chen M (2014) New York City Housing Authority may be the city’s worst landlord. The Nation, 16 June.
City of New York (2014) Housing New York: A Five-Borough, Ten-Year Plan. New York: Mayor’s Office.
City of New York (2015) NextGeneration NYCHA. New York: Mayor’s Office.
Clavel P (1986) The Progressive City: Planning and Participation, 1969–1984. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Editorial Board (2014) New York’s affordable housing shortage. New York Times, 7 February.
Fainstein S (2005) Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research 25(2): 121–130.
Fainstein S (2010) The Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Galster G (2007) Neighbourhood social mix as a goal of housing policy: A theoretical analysis. European Journal of Social Policy 7(1): 19–43.
Goetz E (2011) Where have all the towers gone? The dismantling of public housing in U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Affairs 33(3): 267–287.
Goetz E (2013) New Deal Ruins: Race, Economic Justice, and Public Housing Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Gonzalez J (2008) Housing Authority keeping thousands of units empty while many families wait. New York Daily News, 6 June.
Graves E (2010) The structuring of urban life in a mixed-income housing ‘community.’ City & Community 9(1): 109–131.
Hackworth J, Smith N (2001) The changing state of gentrification. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geographie 92(4): 464–477.
Harvey D (1989) From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler 71(1): 3–17.
Harvey D (2009) Social Justice and the City. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
Jacobson M (2012) The land that time and money forgot. New York Magazine, 9 September.
Jonas A, Wilson D (1999) The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives, Two Decades Later. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Jones D (2013) Time to press ‘reset’ button on NYCHA infill plan. Community Service Society, 2 July.
Joseph M, Chaskin R (2010) Living in a mixed-income development: Resident perceptions of the benefits and disadvantages of two developments in Chicago. Urban Studies 47(11): 2347–2366.
Joseph M, Chaskin R, Webber H (2007) The theoretical basis for addressing poverty through mixed-income development. Urban Affairs Review 42(3): 369–409.
Keating L (2000) Redeveloping public housing: Relearning urban renewal’s immutable lessons. Journal of the American Planning Association 66(4): 384–397.
Kwartler M (1991) Building in your backyard: Affordable land for affordable housing. New York: Michael Kwartler and Associates.
Logan J, Molotch H (2007) Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Place. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Macleod G (2011) Urban politics reconsidered: Growth machine to post-democratic city? Urban Studies 48(12): 2629–2660.
McClure K (2006) The Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program goes mainstream and moves to the suburbs. Housing Policy Debate 17(3): 419–446.
McShane L, Smith G (2012) NYCHA board sitting on nearly $1B in fed cash. New York Daily News, 1 August.
Marcuse P (1986a) Housing policy and the myth of the benevolent state. In: Bratt R, Hartman C, Meyerson A (eds) Critical Perspectives on Housing. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, pp. 248–263.
Marcuse P (1986b) Abandonment, gentrification and displacement: The linkages in New York City. In: Smith N, Williams P (eds) Gentrification of the City. London: Unwin Hyman, pp. 153–177.
Marcuse P (2009) From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City 13(2–3): 185–197.
Molotch H (1976) The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology 82(2): 309–332.
Molotch H (1999) Growth machine links: Up, down, and across. In: Jonas A, Wilson D (eds) The Urban Growth Machine: Critical Perspectives, Two Decades Later. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 247–266.
Mossberger K, Stoker G (2001) The evolution of urban regime theory: The challenge of conceptualization. Urban Affairs Review 36(6): 810–835.
Navarro M (2013a) Tenants worried by plans to build near city projects. New York Times, 11 March.
Navarro M (2013b) Housing authority is sued over slow pace of repairs. New York Times, 29 April.
Navarro M (2014) Public housing in New York reaches a fiscal crisis. New York Times, 11 August.
Newman K, Ashton P (2004) Neoliberal urban policy and new paths of neighborhood change in the American inner city. Environment and Planning A 36(7): 1151–1172.
New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) (2006) The Plan to Preserve Public Housing. New York: New York City Housing Authority.
New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) (2011) Plan NYCHA: A Roadmap for Preservation. New York: New York City Housing Authority.
New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) (2013a) The NYCHA Employee Bulletin. Volume 9, Number 1. New York: New York City Housing Authority.
New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) (2013b) Land Lease Initiative Request for Expressions of Interest. New York: New York City Housing Authority.
New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) (2013c) Land Lease Initiative – Pre-RFP Discussion Document. New York: New York City Housing Authority.
New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) (2014) Facts About NYCHA. New York: New York City Housing Authority.
Popkin S, Katz B, Cunningham M, et al. (2004) A Decade of HOPE VI: Research Findings and Policy Challenges. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Rhea J (2013) Testimony from NYCHA Chairman John B. Rhea. Oversight – NYCHA’s Plans to Lease Land for Development. New York City Council. Public Housing Committee, 5 April.
Smith G (2013a) NYCHA tenants wait years for basic repairs while some work is marked ‘done’ without being fixed. New York Daily News, 30 November.
Smith G (2013b) High and mighty NYCHA: Luxury towers on leased land would ‘look down’ on projects. New York Daily News, 11 June.
Smith G (2013c) NYCHA set to lease playgrounds, community centers for luxury high-rises. New York Daily News, 5 February.
Steffan B (2013) Worst Case Housing Needs 2011: Report to Congress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Stone C (1993) Urban regimes and the capacity to govern: A political economy approach. Journal of Urban Affairs 15(1): 1–28.
Stringer S (2008) Land Rich, Pocket Poor: Making the Most of New York City Housing Authority’s (NYCHA) Unused Development Rights. New York: Office of Manhattan Borough President.
Thompson W Jr (2006) Audit Report on the Timeliness of the Renovation of Vacant Apartments by the New York City Housing Authority. ME06–055A. New York: Office of the Comptroller.
Ungar-Sargon B (2013) Details emerge about plan for private buildings on NYCHA land. City Limits, 4 March.
Vale LJ (2002) Reclaiming Public Housing: A Half Century of Struggle in Three Public Neighborhoods. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vale LJ (2013) Purging the Poorest: Public Housing and the Design Politics of Twice-cleared Communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Venkatesh S (2000) American Project: The Rise and Fall of a Modern Ghetto. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weber R (2002) Extracting value from the city: Neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. Antipode 34(3): 519–540.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: November 3, 2015
Issue published: January 2017
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Article usage*
Total views and downloads: 1709
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 13 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 13
- Housing the Poor? A Comparative Study of Public Housing Provision in New York, Hong Kong, and Shenzhen
- Prosperity and inclusion: The impact of public housing supply on urban inclusive growth in China
- Preservation Planning: Redeveloping Public and Affordable Housing
- Exploring the Coordination Mechanism for Public Housing Supply with Urban Growth Management: A Case Study of Chongqing, China
- Just Smart or Just and Smart Cities? Assessing the Literature on Housing and Information and Communication Technology
- Housing Policy and Vulnerable Families in The Inner City
- Balancing act: the effects of race and poverty on LIHTC development in Boston
- Land pricing upon the extension of leases in public leasehold systems
- Public land revisited: municipalization and privatization in Newark and New York City
- A framework & dynamic model for reform of residential land supply policy in urban China
- View More
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
