![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This article analyzes a proposal submitted to a funding unit in Michigan Technological University by a PhD Forestry student. A rhetorical-cultural approach of the text provides evidence to argue that scientific writing is rooted in a cultural practice that valorizes certain kinds of thought, practices, rituals, and symbols; that a scientist’s work is grounded and shaped by an ideological paradigm; hence, scientific texts have material existence. We find out that science writing is kairotic, selective, and persuasive. The results of the analysis provide enough insights for technical communicators to think about the role that institutions and disciplines play in knowledge production. Thus, technical communicators will not only think about rhetorical moves when they are composing, they will also think about the articulations between contexts and ideological practices and how they shape the identity of writers and communicators.
Keywords technical writing, culture, rhetoric, genre, scientific writing
References
Section:
| Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (notes Towards an Investigation) (B. Brewster, Trans.). In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (p. 127). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press. Google Scholar | |
| Bazerman, C. (1983). Scientific writing as a social act: A review of the literature of the sociology of science. In P. V. Anderson, R. J. Brockman, & C. R. Miller (Eds.), New essays in technical and scientific communication: Research, theory, practice (pp. 156–184). Farmingdale, NY: Baywood Publishing Co. Google Scholar | |
| Berger, P., Luckmann, T. (1966) The social construction of knowledge: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, Garden City, NY: Doubleday. Google Scholar | |
| Brantlinger, P. (1990) Crusoe's footprints: Cultural studies in Britain and America, New York, NY: Routledge, Chapman and Hall Inc. Google Scholar | |
| Bruffee, K. A. (1986) Social construction, language, and the authority of knowledge: A bibliographical essay. College English 48: 773–790. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Ceccarelli, L. (2001) Rhetorical criticism and the rhetoric of science. Western Journal of Communication (includes Communication Reports) 65: 314–329. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Code, L. (1991) What can she know?: Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Ding, D. (1998) Rationality reborn: Historical roots of the passive voice in scientific discourse. In: Battalio, J. T. (ed.) Essays in the study of scientific discourse: Methods, practice, and pedagogy, Stamford, CT: Ablex Publishing, pp. 117–135. Google Scholar | |
| Fahnestock, J. (1986) Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication 3: 275–296. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Graves, H. B. (1995) Rhetoric and reality in the process of scientific inquiry. Rhetoric Review 14: 106–125. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Gross, A. G. (1990) The rhetoric of science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Haraway, D. J. (1998) Simians, Cyborgs, and women the reinvention of nature, London: Free Association Books. Google Scholar | |
| Harding, S. (1986) The science question in science, New York, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Harding, S. (1991) Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Herndl, C. G. (1993) Cultural studies and the critical science. In: Selzer, J. (ed.) Understanding scientific prose, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 61–81. Google Scholar | |
| Karen, A., Mumby, D. K. (2004) Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
| Keller, E. F. (1985) Reflections on gender and science, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Kuhn, T. S. (2012) The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Latour, B. W. S. (1986) Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Longo, B. (2007). An approach for applying cultural study theory to technical writing research. In J. B. Scott, B. Longo, & K. V. Wills (Eds.), Critical power tools technical communication and cultural studies (pp. 111–131). State University of New York Press. Google Scholar | |
| Merchant, C. (2006) The scientific revolution and the death of nature. History of Science Society 97: 513–532. Google Scholar | |
| Monberg, J. (2002) Science and technology studies as a research method. In: Gurak, L. J., Lay, M. M. (eds) Research in technical communication, Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 211–227. Google Scholar | |
| Myers, G. (1985) The social construction of two biologists' proposals. Written Communication 2: 219–245. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Penrose, A. M., Katz, S. B. (2010) Writing in the sciences: Exploring conventions of scientific discourse, New York, NY: Pearson Longman. Google Scholar | |
| Rosner, M., Rhoades, G. (1993) Science, gender, and “the spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm”. In: Selzer, J. (ed.) Understanding scientific prose, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, pp. 82–105. Google Scholar | |
| Rosteck, T. (1995) Review essay: Cultural studies and rhetorical studies. Quarterly Journal of Speech 81: 386–403. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Rude, C. D. (2009) Mapping the research questions in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 23: 174–215. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Scott, J. B. (2003a) Risky rhetoric, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Scott, J. B. (2003b) Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Selzer, J. (1993) Understanding scientific prose, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press. Google Scholar | |
| Sidler, M. (2006) The rhetoric of cells: Understanding molecular biology in the twenty-first century. Rhetoric Review 25: 58–75. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Slack, J. D. (1997) The theory and method of articulation in cultural studies. In: Morley, D. (ed.) Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies, London: Routledge, pp. 113–130. Google Scholar | |
| Stuart, H. (1980) Cultural studies: Two paradigms. Media, Culture and Society 2: 57–72. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Sullivan, D. L. (1991) The epideictic rhetoric of science. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 5: 229–245. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Wajcman, J. (1991) Feminism confronts technology, Pennsylvania: The Pennslyvania State University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Wickman, C. (2012) Rhetoric, techne, and the art of scientific inquiry. Rhetoric Review 31: 21–40. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
Author Biography
Isidore Kafui Dorpenyo is a PhD candidate in the Rhetoric, Theory and Culture program at Michigan Technical University. Isidore’s research explores the intersections between rhetoric, technical communication studies, cultural studies, and international technical communication.
