![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
When games are approached as a pedagogical methodology, the homologies between games and technical communication are highlighted: pedagogy that teaches people to play and succeed within certain confines; classroom assessment that provides meaningful feedback to encourage self-improvement; instructional design that incorporates gaming theory and game design principles; and usability to ensure optimum success. This article provides an overview of these topics for instructors to consider when designing a technical writing course as a game.
Keywords technical communication, gaming, teaching, pedagogy, assessment
References
Section:
| Björk, S., Holopainen, J. (2006) Games and design patterns. In: Salen, K., Zimmerman, E. (eds) The game design reader, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 410–437. Google Scholar | |
| Bogost, I. (2011) How to do things with videogames, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Choontanom, T., Nardi, B. (2012) Theorycrafting: The art and science of using numbers to interpret the world. In: Steinkuehler, C., Squire,, K., Barab, S. (eds) Games, learning, and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Press, pp. 185–209. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Church, D. (2006) Formal abstract design tools. In: Salen, K., Zimmerman, E. (eds) The game design reader, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 366–380. Google Scholar | |
| Collins, A., Halverson, R. (2009) Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America, New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Google Scholar | |
| Cook, K. C. (2005) An argument for pedagogy-driven online education. In: Cook, K. C., Grant-Davie, K. (eds) Online education: Global questions, local answers, Amityville, NY: Baywood, pp. 49–66. Google Scholar | |
| Dahlen, C. (2008). “Game designer Jonathan Blow: What we all missed about Braid.” A.V. Club. Retrieved from http://www.avclub.com/articles/game-designer-jonathan-blow-what-we-all-missed-abo,8626/. Google Scholar | |
| Dubinsky, J. M. (2002) More than a knack: Technê and teaching technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly 11(2): 129–145. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Dubinsky, J. M. (2004) Becoming user-centered, reflective practitioners. In: Dubinsky, J. M. (ed.) Teaching technical communication: Critical issues for the classroom, Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s, pp. 1–10. Google Scholar | |
| Gee, J. P. (2007) What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar | |
| Gee, J. P., Hayes, E. R. (2011) Language and learning in the digital age, New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
| Haswell, R., Wyche-Smith, S. (1994) Adventuring into writing assessment. College Composition and Communication 45(2): 220–236. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Johnson, R. R. (1998) User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts, Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar | |
| Ko, S., Rossen, S. (2010) Teaching online: A practical guide, New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar | |
| Kuniavsky, M. (2003) Observing the user experience: A practitioner’s guide to user research, San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Google Scholar | |
| Mason, J. (2013) Video games as technical communication ecology. Technical Communication Quarterly 22(3): 219–236. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Matthews-Denatale, G. (2000) Teach us how to play: The role of play in technology education. In: Harrington, S., Rickly,, R., Day, M. (eds) The online writing classroom, Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 63–80. Google Scholar | |
| McGonigal, J. (2011) Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world, New York, NY: Penguin. Google Scholar | |
| Miller, C. (2004) What’s practical about technical writing? In: Dubinsky, J. M. (ed.) Teaching technical communication: Critical issues for the classroom, Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s, pp. 154–164. Google Scholar | |
| Murray, J. H. (1997) Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
| Paul, C. A. (2011). Optimizing play: How theorycraft changes gameplay and design. Game Studies 11(2). Retrieved from http://gamestudies.org/1102/articles/paul. Google Scholar | |
| Salen, K., Torres, R., Wolozin, L., Rufo-Tepper, R., Shapiro, A. (2011) Quest to learn: Developing the school for digital kids, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
| Sheldon, L. (2012) The multiplayer classroom: Designing coursework as a game, Boston, MA: Course Technology. Google Scholar | |
| Squire, K. (2011) Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age, New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Google Scholar | |
| Steinkuehler, C., Squire, K., & Barab, S. (Eds.). (2012). Games, learning and society: Learning and meaning in the digital age. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Tebeaux, E. (1985) Redesigning professional writing courses to meet the communication needs of writers in business and industry. College Composition and Communication 36(4): 419–428. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Thomas, D., Brown, J. S. (2011) A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change, Lexington, KY: CreateSpace. Google Scholar | |
| Unger, R., Chandler, C. (2012) A project guide to UX design: For user experience designers in the field or in the making, Berkeley, CA: New Riders. Google Scholar | |
| Walvoord, B. E. (2010) Assessment clear and simple: A practical guide for institutions, departments, and general education (2nd ed.), San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass. Google Scholar |
Author Biography
Carly Finseth, PhD, is an assistant professor of Technical Communication at Boise State University. Although her teaching and research interests are varied, they broadly include the intersections of teaching writing, gaming studies, instructional design, digital rhetoric, usability, and technology and culture.
