![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
References
Section:
| Berkenkotter, C. (2008) Patient tales: Case histories and the used of narrative in psychiatry, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. Google Scholar | |
| Blicq, R. S., Moretto, L. (2003) Technically-write!, 6th ed. London, England: Pearson Longman. Google Scholar | |
| Britt, E. C. (2001) Conceiving normalcy: Rhetoric, law, and the double binds of infertility, Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press. Google Scholar | |
| Buchanan, L. (2013) Rhetorics of motherhood, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Buchnell, J. (1999) A contrary view of the technical writing classroom: Notes toward future discussion. Technical Communication Quarterly 8: 175–188. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Houp, K. W., Pearsall, T. E., Tebeauz, E., Dragga, S. (2005) Reporting technical information, 11th ed. New York City, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Kenny Fountain, T. (2014) Rhetoric in the flesh: Trained vision, technical expertise, and the gross anatomy lab, New York, NY: ATTW Routledge/Taylor Francis. Google Scholar | |
| Koerber, A. (2013) Breast or bottle: Contemporary controversies in infant-feeding policy and practice, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. Google Scholar | |
| LaDuc, L., Goldrick-Jones, A. (1994) The critical eye, the gendered lens, and “situated” insights—Feminist contributions to professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly 3: 245–256. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Latour, B., Woolgar, S. (1986) Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts, Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Lay, M. M. (1989) Interpersonal conflict in collaborative writing: What we can learn from gender studies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 3: 5–28. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Lay, M. M. (2000) The rhetoric of midwifery: Gender, knowledge, and power, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Lay, M. M., & Karis, W. (Eds.). (1991). Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice. Amityville, NY: Baywood Press. Google Scholar | |
| Losano, W. A. (1979). Comparative analysis and audience levels. In M. Whitburn (Ed.), Teaching technical writing: The first day in the technical writing course (Anthology No. 3, pp. 17–21). Retrieved from http://www.attw.org/sites/default/files/Whitburn-FirstDay-ATTW-1979.pdf. Google Scholar | |
| Miller, C. R. (1979) A humanistic rationale for technical writing. College English 40: 610–617. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Sauer, B. (1993) Sense and sensibility in technical documentation: How feminist interpretation strategies can save lives in the nation’s mines. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 7: 63–83. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Schuster, M. L., & Propen, A. (2006). WATCH victim impact statement study. Retrieved from http://038d538.netsolhost.com/watchwordpress1/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/WATCH-VIS-Final-.pdf. Google Scholar | |
| Schuster, M. L., Propen, A. D. (2011) Victim advocacy in the courtroom: Persuasive practices in domestic violence and child protection cases, Lebanon, NY: University Press of New England/Northeastern University Press Series on Gender, Crime, and Law. Google Scholar | |
| Scott, J. B. (2003) Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Segal, J. Z. (2005) Health and the rhetoric of medicine, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Seigal, M. (2014) The rhetoric of pregnancy, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar |
Other Articles on Communication by This Author
Section:
| Schuster, M. L., & Propen, A. D. (2011a). Degrees of emotion: Judicial responses to victim impact statements. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 6, 75–104. Google Scholar | |
| Schuster, M. L., & Propen, A. D. (2011b). Victim advocacy in the courtroom: Persuasive practices in domestic violence and child protection cases. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press Series on Gender, Crime, and Law by University Press of New England. Google Scholar | |
| Schuster, M. L., & Propen, A. D. (2015). Expanding our understanding of kairos: Tracing moral panic and risk perception in the debate over the Minnesota sex offender program. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45, 3–30. Google Scholar | |
| Schuster, M. L., Russell, A. L. B., Bartels, D. M., & Kelly-Trombley, H. (2013). “Standing in Terri Schiavo’s shoes”: The role of genre in end-of-life decision making. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22, 195–218. Google Scholar | |
| Schuster, M. L., Russell, A. L. B., Bartels, D. M., & Kelly-Trombley, H. (2014). Determining ‘best interests’ in end-of-life decisions for the developmentally disabled: Minnesota state guardians and wards. Disability Studies Quarterly, 34. Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/4276. Google Scholar |
