To address graduate writing pedagogy in technical communication, this article reports on a study of 14 award-winning dissertations in the field. By treating dissertations as cultural artifacts constitutive of the educational contexts in which they are authored, this study reads dissertation methodology sections as research narratives to understand how we prepare new scholars and to examine the changing nature of what we value in the field.

Bowen, W. G., Rudenstine, N. L. (1992) In pursuit of the PhD, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brooks-Gillies, M., Garcia, E. G., Kim, S. H., Manthey, K., Smith, T. (2015) Graduate writing across the disciplines, introduction [Special issue on graduate writing across the disciplines]. Across the Disciplines 12(3): n.pg. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/graduate_wac/intro.cfm.
Google Scholar
Bunton, D. (1999) The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses. English for Specific Purposes 18: 4156.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cheng, X., Steffensen, M. S. (1996) Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing. Research in the Teaching of English 30(2): 149181.
Google Scholar | ISI
Enoch, J., & Gold, D. (2013). Seizing the methodological moment: The digital humanities and historiography in rhetoric and composition. College English, 76(2), 105–114.
Google Scholar
Giles, S. (2010) Reflective writing and the revision process: What were you thinking? In: Lowe, C., Zemliansky, P. (eds) Writing spaces: Readings on writing Vol. 1, Anderson, SC: Parlor Press, pp. 191204.
Google Scholar
Giltrow, J. (2003). System, self, and linguistic consciousness. In C. Bazerman & D. Russell (Eds.), Writing selves/writing societies. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/ C.
Google Scholar
Golde, C. M., Dore, T. M. (2004) The survey of doctoral education and career preparation: The importance of disciplinary contexts. In: Wulff, D. H., Austin, A. E. (eds) Path to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 1945.
Google Scholar
Graham, S. S., Kim, S. Y., DeVasto, D. M., Keith, W. (2015) Statistical genre analysis: Toward big data methodologies in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly 24(1): 70104. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975955.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. L. (2010). The practice of qualitative research, 2nd Ed. Sage Publications, Inc.
Google Scholar
Lave, J., Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lippincott, J. K., Lynch, C. A. (2010) ETDS and graduate education: Programs and prospects. Research Library Issues 270: 615.
Google Scholar
McNely, B., Spinuzzi, C., Teston, C. (2015) Contemporary research methodologies in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly 24(1): 113. doi:10.1080/10572252.2015.975958.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Micciche, L. R., Carr, A. D. (2011) Toward graduate-level writing instruction. College Composition and Communication 62(3): 477501.
Google Scholar | ISI
Miller, C. (1984) Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151167.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Miller, C. (1994) Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In: Freedman, A., Medway, P. (eds) Genre and the new rhetoric, London, England: Taylor and Francis, pp. 6778.
Google Scholar
Mueller, D. (2016). Turn spotting. Retrieved from derekmueller.net/turn.
Google Scholar
Nickoson, L., Sheridan, M. P., Kirsch, G. E. (2012) Writing studies research in practice, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. (2002) Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes 21: 125143.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pantelides, K. (2015) Dissertation genre change as a result of electronic theses and dissertation programs [Special issue on graduate writing across the disciplines]. Across the Disciplines 12(3): n.pg. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/atd/graduate_wac/pantelides2015.cfm.
Google Scholar
Paré, A. (2010) Making sense of supervision: Deciphering feedback. In: Thomson, P., Walker, M. (eds) The Routledge doctoral student’s companion: Getting to grips with research in education and the social sciences, London, England: Routledge, pp. 107115.
Google Scholar
Paré, A. (2011) Speaking of writing: Supervisory feedback and the dissertation. In: McAlpine, L., Amundsen, C. (eds) Doctoral education: Research-based strategies for doctoral students, supervisors and administrators, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 5974.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Pare, A. (2014). Rhetorical genre theory and academic literacy. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 8(1), A83–A94.
Google Scholar
Paré, A., Starke-Meyerring, D., McAlpine, L. (2009) The dissertation as multi-genre: Many readers, many readings. In: Bazerman, C., Bonini, A., Figueiredo, D. (eds) Genre in a changing world, Fort Collins, CO: The WAC Clearinghouse and Parlor Press, pp. 179193. Retrieved from http://wac.colostate.edu/books/genre/.
Google Scholar
Rickly, R. (2012) Making sense of making knowledge. College Composition and Communication 64(1): 224237.
Google Scholar | ISI
Rose, M., McClafferty, K. A. (2001) A call for the teaching of writing in graduate education. Educational Researcher 30(2): 2733.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Salee, M., Hallett, R., Tierney, W. (2011) Teaching writing in graduate school. College Teaching 59: 6672.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Selber, S. (2004) The CCCC outstanding dissertation in technical communication: A retrospective analysis. Technical Communication Quarterly 13(2): 139155.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Starke-Meyerring, D., Paré, A., Sun, K. Y., El-Bezre, N. (2014) Probing normalized institutional discourses about writing: The case of the doctoral thesis. Journal of Academic Language and Learning 8(2): A13A27.
Google Scholar
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and application. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Thayer, A., Evans, M., McBride, A. A., Queen, M., Spyridakis, J. (2007) Content analysis as a best practice in technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 37(3): 267279.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JTW-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0