Executive Entrepreneurship in National Departments

First Published April 4, 2017 Research Article

Authors

12
 
Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
 
National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan
by this author
, 2
 
National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan
by this author
, 3
 
City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong
by this author
,
1
 
Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
by this author
...
First Published Online: April 4, 2017

Leadership by senior public managers in national departments is increasingly called for in response to many policy challenges and limitations of appointee and political leadership. This study defines “executive entrepreneurship” as senior, career public managers furthering new policies and initiatives, with input from stakeholders and support from political appointees. Study results from a dyadic survey of executives reporting directly to (deputy) ministers show that executive entrepreneurship is significantly furthered by (a) executives’ commitment to public causes, (b) orientation of appointees to their obligations and agency roles, and (c) external accountability of department performance. Implications are discussed for future studies.

Aberbach, J., Putnam, R., Rockman, B. (1981). Bureaucrats and politicians in western democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Aberbach, J., Rockman, B. (2006). The past and future of political-administrative relations: Research from bureaucrats and politicians to in the web of politics—and beyond. International Journal of Public Administration, 29, 977-995.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Askim, J., Karlsen, R., Kolltveit, K. (2016). Political appointees in executive government: Exploring and explaining roles using a large-N survey in Norway. Public Administration. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/padm.12272
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Behn, R. (1998). What right do public managers have to lead? Public Administration Review, 58, 209-224.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., Steijn, B. (Eds.). (2011). Innovation in the public sector: Linking capacity and leadership. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Berman, E. M., Kim, C. G. (2010). Creativity management in public organizations: Jump-starting innovation. Public Performance & Management Review, 33, 619-652.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Berman, E., Chen, D. Y., Jan, C. Y., Huang, T. Y. (2013). Public agency leadership: The impact of informal understandings with political appointees on perceived agency innovation in Taiwan. Public Administration, 91(2), 303-324.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Berman, E., Wang, C. Y., Chen, C. A., Wang, X., Lovrich, N., Jan, C. Y., … Meléndez, C. (2013). Public executive leadership in East and West: An examination of HRM factors in eight countries. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33, 164-184.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bernier, L., Hafsi, T. (2007). The changing nature of public entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 67, 488-503.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Berry, R., Bridgman, T. (2013). The Case Program—Trimming the FAT: Change at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Case 2013-142.1). Carlton: The Australia and New Zealand School of Government.
Google Scholar
Bingham, L., O’Leary, R. (2008). Big ideas in collaborative public management. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Google Scholar
Boin, A., Hart, P. T., McConnell, A., Preston, T. (2010). Leadership style, crisis response and blame management: The case of Hurricane Katrina. Public Administration, 88, 706-723.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Borins, S. (2000). Loose cannons and rule breakers, or enterprising leaders? Some evidence about innovative public managers. Public Administration Review, 60, 498-507.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Borins, S. (2014). The persistence of innovation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Google Scholar
Bourgault, J. (2011). Canada’s senior public service and the typology of bargains: From the hierarchy of senior civil servants to a community of “controlled” entrepreneurs. Public Policy and Administration, 26, 253-275.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Brehm, J., Gates, S. (2014). Bureaucratic politics arising from, not defined by, a principal–agency dyad. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 27-42.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brewer, G., Maranto, R. (2000). Comparing the roles of political appointees and career executives in the U.S. federal executive branch. The American Review of Public Administration, 30, 69-86.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647-663.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chenok, D. (2015, June 15). How can the next president build a strong political and career leadership team? Government Executive. Retrieved from http://www.govexec.com/excellence/promising-practices/2015/06/how-can-next-president-build-strong-political-and-career-leadership-team/115291/
Google Scholar
Christensen, R. K., Wright, B. E. (2011). The effects of public service motivation on job choice decisions: Disentangling the contributions of person-organization fit and person-job fit. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21, 723-743.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cohen, D. (1996). Amateur government: When political appointees manage the federal bureaucracy (CPM Working Paper 96-1). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/amateur.pdf
Google Scholar
Currie, G., Lockett, A. (2011). Distributing leadership in health and social care: Concertive, conjoint or collective? International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 286-300.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Dahl, A., Soss, J. (2014). Neoliberalism for the common good? Public value governance and the downsizing of democracy. Public Administration Review, 74, 496-504.
Google Scholar | Crossref
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V., Tummers, L. (2015). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94, 146-166.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Doig, J., Hargrove, E. (Eds.). (1990). Leadership and innovation: Entrepreneurs in government. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Dull, M., Roberts, P., Keeney, M., Choi, S. (2012). Appointee confirmation and tenure: The succession of U.S. Federal Agency appointees, 1989-2009. Public Administration Review, 72, 902-913.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Favero, N., Bullock, J. (2015). How (not) to solve the problem: An evaluation of scholarly responses to common source bias. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 285-308.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ferrara, J., Ross, L. (2005). Getting to know you: Rules of engagement for political appointees and career executives. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
Google Scholar
Forrester, D. (2007). Government’s new breed of change agents: Leading the war on terror. In Morse, R., Buss, T., Kinghorn, C. (Eds.), Transforming public leadership for the 21st century (pp. 324-343). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Google Scholar
Freedman, J., Fraser, S. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195-202.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Fukuyama, F. (2013). What is governance? Governance, 26, 347-368.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fukuyama, F. (2014). America in decay: The sources of political dysfunction. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 5-26.
Google Scholar
Gallo, N., Lewis, D. (2012). The consequences of presidential patronage for federal agency performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 219-243.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Getha-Taylor, H., Holmes, M., Jacobson, W., Morse, R., Sowa, J. (2011). Focusing the public leadership lens: Research propositions and questions in the Minnowbrook tradition. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(Suppl. 1), i83-i97.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423-451.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Heclo, H. (1977). A government of strangers. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Google Scholar
Heinrich, C. (2012). How credible is the evidence, and does it matter? An analysis of the Program Assessment Rating Tool. Public Administration Review, 72, 123-134.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hood, C. (2010). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hood, C., Lodge, M. (2006). The politics of public service bargains. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
International Monetary Fund . (2014). World economic outlook database. Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
Jakobsen, M., Jensen, R. (2015). Common method bias in public management studies. International Public Management Journal, 18, 3-30.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kamerman, S. B., Kahn, A. J. (Eds.). (2014). Privatization and the welfare state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Karaca, H., Kapucu, N., Van Wart, M. (2012). Examining the role of transformational leadership in emergency management: The case of FEMA. Risk, Hazards, & Crisis in Public Policy, 3(3), 19-37.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kee, J., Newcomer, K., David, S. (2007). Transformational stewardship: Leading public sector change. In Morse, R., Buss, T., Kinghorn, C. (Eds.), Transforming public leadership for the 21st century (pp. 324-343). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Google Scholar
Kenny, D., Kashy, D., Cook, W. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY:Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Kim, P. S. (2009). A case for performance management for political appointees. Public Personnel Management, 38(4), 1-18.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Kim, S., Vandenabeele, W., Wright, B. E., Andersen, L. B., Cerase, F. P., Christensen, R. K., . . . De Vivo, P. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 79-102.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Klein, P., Mahoney, J., McGahan, A., Pitelis, C. N. (2010). Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, 7, 1-15.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kroll, A., Vogel, D. (2014). The PSM–leadership fit: A model of performance information use. Public Administration, 92, 974-991.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lambright, W. H. (2016). Reflections on leadership: Jean-Jacques Dordain of the European Space Agency. Public Administration Review, 76, 507-511.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lane, J., Wallis, J. (2009). Strategic management and public leadership. Public Management Review, 11, 101-120.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lee, G., Benoit-Bryan, J., Johnson, T. (2012). Survey research in public administration: Assessing mainstream journals with a total survey error framework. Public Administration Review, 72, 87-97.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lee, W.-Y., Yih, W.-S. (2007). Zhengfu jiguan shizheng jixiao pinggu zhi xiankuang yu zhanwang [The implementation and prospect of government agency performance evaluation system]. Yankao shuangyue kan/Bimonthly Journal of RDEC, 31(2), 3-12.
Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (2007). Testing Pendleton’s premise: Do political appointees make worse bureaucrats? Journal of Politics, 69, 1073-1088.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lewis, D. (2008). The politics of presidential appointments: Political control and bureaucratic appointments. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Leyden, D., Link, A. (2014). Public sector entrepreneurship: U.S. technology and innovation policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Light, P. (2008). A government ill executed: The depletion of the federal service. Public Administration Review, 68, 413-419.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lin, C.-C. (2003). Zhengfu jiguan shizheng jixiao pinggu de tuidong yu zhanwang [The implementation and prospect of government agency performance evaluation system]. Yankao shuangyue kan/Bimonthly Journal of RDEC, 27(5), 5-19.
Google Scholar
Mack, W., Green, D., Vedlitz, A. (2008). Innovation and implementation in the public sector: An examination of public entrepreneurship. Review of Policy Research, 25, 233-252.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mackenzie, G. C. (Ed.). (1987). The in-and-outers: Presidential appointees and transient government in Washington. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Meier, K. (1997). Bureaucracy and democracy: The case for more bureaucracy and less democracy. Public Administration Review, 57, 193-199.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Meier, K., O’Toole, L. (2006). Political control versus bureaucratic values: Reframing the debate. Public Administration Review, 66, 177-192.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Meier, K., O’Toole, L. (2013). Subjective organizational performance and measurement error: Common source bias and spurious relationships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23, 429-456.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Meijer, A. (2014). From hero-innovators to distributed heroism: An in-depth analysis of the role of individuals in public sector innovation. Public Management Review, 16, 199-216.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Miller, S. (2015). The relationship between short-term political appointments and bureaucratic performance: The case of recess appointments in the United States. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 777-796. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu037
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mintrom, M., Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37, 649-667.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Moe, R. C. (1994). The “reinventing government” exercise: Misinterpreting the problem, misjudging the consequences. Public Administration Review, 54, 111-122.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Moon, M. J. (1999). The pursuit of managerial entrepreneurship: Does organization matter? Public Administration Review, 59, 31-43.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
National Academy of Public Administration . (2015). The political appointee project. Retrieved from http://politicalappointeeproject.org
Google Scholar
Neo, B. S., Chen, G. (2007). Dynamic governance: Embedding culture, capabilities and change in Singapore. Singapore: World Scientific.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Park, S.-M., Rainey, H. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in U.S. federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11, 109-142.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Perry, J. L., Vandenabeele, W. (2015). Public service motivation research: Achievements, challenges, and future directions. Public Administration Review, 75, 692-699.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Perry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 5-22.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Peters, B. G., Savoie, D. (1995). Governance in a new environment. Montreal, Québec, Canada: McGill/Queen’s University Press.
Google Scholar
Pierson, P., Skocpol, T. (2007). The transformation of American politics: Activist government and the rise of conservatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Rhodes, R. (2011). Everyday life in British government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Ritz, A. (2009). Public service motivation and organizational performance in Swiss federal government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 53-78.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Svara, J. (1985). Dichotomy and duality: Reconceptualizing the relationship between policy and administration in council-manager cities. Public Administration Review, 45, 221-232.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Svara, J. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 61, 176-183.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Te Kawa, D., Guerin, K. (2012). Provoking debate and learning lessons: It is ear days, but what does the performance improvement framework challenge us to think about? Policy Quarterly, 8(4), 28-36.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Terry, L. (2003). Leadership of public bureaucracies: The administrator as conservator (2nd ed.). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Google Scholar
Transparency International . (2015). Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. Retrieved from http://www.transparency.org/cpi2015
Google Scholar
Trottier, T., Van Wart, M., Wang, X. (2008). Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations. Public Administration Review, 68, 319-333.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Van Wart, M . (2013). Administrative leadership theory: A reassessment after 10 years. Public Administration, 91, 521-543.
Google Scholar | ISI
Van Wart, M., Hondeghem, A., Schwella, E. (Eds.). (2014). Leadership and culture: Comparative models of top civil servant training. Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Walker, R. M., Boyne, G. A., Brewer, G. A. (Eds.). (2010). Public management and performance: Research directions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Walker, R. M., Jung, C. S., Boyne, G. A. (2013). Marching to different drummers? The performance effects of alignment between political and managerial perceptions of performance management. Public Administration Review, 73, 833-844.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
West, W. (2005). Administrative rulemaking: An old and emerging literature. Public Administration Review, 65, 655-668.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wilkins, J. (2014). Stewardship of public service renewal and reform. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 10, 188-199.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Williams, L., Hartman, N., Cavazotte, F. (2010). Method variance and marker variables: A review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 477-514.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Windrum, P. (2008). Innovation and entrepreneurship in public services. In Windrum, P., Kock, P. (Eds.), Innovation in public sector services: Entrepreneurship, creativity and management (pp. 3-22). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Google Scholar | Crossref
World Economic Forum . (2014). The global competitiveness report: 2013-2014. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2013-14.pdf
Google Scholar
Wright, B., Moynihan, D., Pandey, S. (2012). Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review, 72, 206-215.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Zhang, Y., Feiock, R. (2010). City managers’ policy leadership in council-manager cities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 461-476.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

AAS-article-ppv for GBP29.00
AAS-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP230.23
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $275.85