Abstract
Many have claimed, but only some have shown, that the social nature of teaching and classrooms is likely to have a direct effect on students’ achievement goals. This study examined the extent to which Dutch secondary school students’ (N = 2892) achievement goals were related to the interpersonal quality of teaching. Students’ goals were examined in terms of individual student perceptions of their teacher and their teacher’s general interpersonal disposition. Multivariate multilevel models were tested, specifying the student and the teacher level and using two achievement approach and two achievement avoidance goals as dependent variables. The most remarkably finding was that students who like a generally tough teacher (Level 2 effect) better than their peers do (i.e. Level 1 effect, students who report relatively high teacher communion) were more likely to report higher levels of approach goals. In particular when considering interpersonally more ‘extreme’ teacher dispositions, effects on students’ goals were considerable. Regarding students’ goals, identifying teachers who generally convey low levels of interpersonal agency and/or communion seems worthwhile for practitioners. Also identifying students with more pronounced, interpersonally negative perceptions of their teachers may be valuable when targeting students’ achievement goals.
| Ames, C. (1992) Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology 84: 261–271. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.84.3.261. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Ames, C., Ames, R. (1984) Student motivation. In: Ames, R. (eds) Research on motivation in education Vol. 1Orlando, FL: Academic, pp. 177–207. Google Scholar | |
| Anderman, L. H., Andrzejewski, C. E., Allen, J. L. (2011) How do teachers support students’ motivation and learning in their classrooms? Teachers College Record 113(5): 969–1003. Google Scholar | ISI | |
| Anderman, E. M., Maehr, M. L. (1994) Motivation and schooling in the middle grades. Review of Educational Research 64: 287–309271. doi: 10.3102/00346543064002287. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Anderman, E. M., Patrick, H. (2012) Achievement goal theory, conceptualization of ability/intelligence, and classroom climate. In: Christenson, S., Reschly, A., Wylie, C. (eds) Handbook of research on student engagement, New York, NY: Springer., pp. 173–191. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_8. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Bong, M. (2009) Age-related differences in achievement goal orientation. Journal of Educational Psychology 101: 879–896. doi: 10.1037/a0015945. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Brekelmans, M. Interpersonal teacher behaviour in the classroom1989. Utrecht, The Netherlands: W.C.C [In Dutch]. Google Scholar | |
| Créton, H. A., Wubbels, T. (1984) Ordeproblemen bij beginnende leraren, Utrecht: WCC. Google Scholar | |
| den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, Th. (2004) Interpersonal teacher behaviour and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 15: 407–442. doi: 10.1080/09243450512331383262. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| den Brok, P., Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, Th. (2006) Multilevel issues in research using students’ perceptions of learning environments: The case of the questionnaire on teacher interaction. Learning Environments Research 9: 199–213. doi: 10.1007/s10984-006-9013-9. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Dweck, C. (1986) Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist 41: 1040–1048. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Elliot, A. J., Dweck, D. S. (2005) Competence and motivation: Competence as the core of achievement motivation. In: Elliot, A., Dweck, C. (eds) Handbook of competence and motivation, New York, NY: Guilford, pp. 3–12. Google Scholar | |
| Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A. (2001) A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80: 501–519. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Fabrigar, L. R., Visser, P. S., Browne, M. W. (1997) Conceptual and methodological issues in testing the circumplex structure of data in personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1: 184–203. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0103_1. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Grassi, M., Luccio, R., Di Blas, L. (2010) CircE: An R implementation of Browne’s circular stochastic process model. Behavior Research Methods 42: 55–73. doi: 10.3758/brm.42.1.55. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Horowitz, S., Strack, L. M. (2010) Handbook of interpersonal psychology, New York, NY: Wiley.doi: 10.1002/9781118001868. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Hox, J. J. (2010) Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications, (2nd ed.). Hove: Routhlegde.doi: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2011.00159_11.x. Google Scholar | |
| Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Kunter, M. (2009) Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modelling. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34: 120–131. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Maehr, M. L. (1984) Meaning and motivation: Toward a theory of personal investment. In: Ames, R., Ames, C. (eds) Research on motivation in education: Student motivation Vol. 1New York, NY: Academic, pp. 115–143. Google Scholar | |
| Mainhard, M. T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., Wubbels, T. (2011) The development of the classroom social climate during the first months of the school year. Contemporary Educational Psychology 36: 190–200. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.06.002. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Mainhard, M. T., Brekelmans, M., Wubbels, T. (2011) Coercive and supportive teacher behaviour: Within- and across-lesson associations with the classroom social climate. Learning and Instruction 21: 345–354. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.003. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Martin, A. J., Dowson, M. (2009) Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and practice. Review of Educational Research 79: 327–365. doi: 10.3102/0034654308325583. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., Middleton, M. (2001) Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology 93(1): 77doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Muthén, L. K., Muthén, B. O. (2012) Mplus user’s guide, (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. Google Scholar | |
| Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M. (2008) What do students think about when evaluating their classroom’s mastery goal structure? An examination of young adolescents’ explanations. The Journal of Experimental Education 77: 99–123. doi: 10.3200/JEXE.77.2.99-124. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Pennings, H. J. M., Brekelmans, M., Wubbles, T., van der Want, A. C., Claessens, L. C. A., van Tartwijk, J. (2014) A nonlinear dynamical systems approach to real-time teacher behaviour: Differences between teachers. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 18: 23–45. Google Scholar | ISI | |
| Rasbash, J., Charlton, C., Browne, W.J., Healy, M., & Cameron, B. (2005). MLwiN Version 2.02. Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol. Google Scholar | |
| Schwinger, M., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2011). Performance-approach and performance-avoidance classroom goals and the adoption of personal achievement goals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 680–699. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02012.x. Google Scholar | |
| Shuell, T. J. (1993) Toward an integrated theory of teaching and learning. Educational Psychologist 28: 291–311. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2804_1. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Turner, J. C., Gray, D. L., Anderman, L. H., Dawson, H., Anderman, E. A. (2013) Getting to know my teacher: Does the relation between perceived mastery goal structures and perceived teacher support change across the school year? Contemporary Educational Psychology 38: 316–327. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.003. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Urdan, T., Midgley, C., Anderman, E. A. (1998) The role of classroom goal structure in students’ use of self-handicapping. American Educational Research Journal 35: 101–122. doi: 10.3102/00028312035001101. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Urdan, T., Schoenfelder, E. (2006) Classroom effects on student motivation: Goal structures, social relationships, and competence beliefs. Journal of School Psychology 44: 331–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.003. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Wiggins, J. S. (1979) A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 395–412. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.395. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Wolters, C. A. (2004) Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 96: 236–250. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., den Brok, P., Wijsman, L., Mainhard, T., van Tartwijk, J. (2014) Teacher-student relationships and classroom management. In: Emmer, E., Sabornie, E. J. (eds) Handbook of Classroom Management, New York, NY: Routledge., pp. 363–386. doi: 10.4324/9780203074114. Google Scholar | |
| Wubbels, T., Brekelmans, M., van Tartwijk, J., den Brok, P. (2006) An interpersonal perspective on classroom management in secondary classrooms in the Netherlands. In: Evertson, C., Weinstein, C. (eds) Handbook of classroom management: Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum., pp. 1161–1191. doi: 10.4324/9780203874783.ch45. Google Scholar |
Author biography
Tim Mainhard (MSC in Cognitive Psychology, PhD in Education) is an Associate Professor at the Department of Education at Utrecht University, The Netherlands. His research uses interpersonal theory to conceptualize social dynamics in educational settings. Tim’s current projects are funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research and focus on (1) the importance of social processes for at-risk students’ prolonged engagement and motivation to learn and on (2) the inter-relation of classroom social processes and teacher well-being.

