Need for Cognition Can Magnify or Attenuate Priming Effects in Social Judgment
Abstract
This article hypothesizes that the individual-difference variable, need for cognition (NFC), can have opposite implications for priming effects, depending on prime blatancy. Subtle primes are argued to be more effective for high- versus low-NFC individuals. This is because for high-NFC individuals, (a) constructs are generally easier to activate, (b) their higher amount of thought offers more opportunity for an activated construct to bias judgment, and (c) their thoughtfully formed judgments are more likely to affect behavior. However, because high-NFC individuals are adept at identifying and correcting for bias, with blatant primes the activated construct should be less likely to exert its default influence. Furthermore, with blatant primes, low-NFC individuals may achieve sufficient activation for primes to affect judgment. Across three studies, it is shown that as NFC increases, the magnitude of priming effects increases with a subtle prime but decreases with a blatant prime.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Asch, S.E. (1948). The doctrine of suggestion, prestige, and imitation in social psychology. Psychological Review, 55, 250-276.
Axsom, D., Yates, S., & Chaiken, S. (1987). Audience response as a heuristic cue in persuasion . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 30-40.
Briñol, P., & Petty, R.E. (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1123-1139.
Briñol, P., Petty, R.E., & Tormala, Z.L. (2004). Self-validation of cognitive responses to advertisements . Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 559-573.
Briñol, P., Rucker, D.D., Tormala, Z.L., & Petty, R.E. (2004). Individual differences in resistance to persuasion: The role of beliefs and meta-beliefs. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 83-104). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cacioppo, J.T., & Petty, R.E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Feinstein, J.A., & Jarvis, W.B.G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., & Kao, C.F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition . Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306-307.
Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E., Kao, C.F., & Rodriguez, R. (1986). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043.
Carver, C.S., Ganellen, R.J., Froming, W.J., & Chambers, W. (1983). Modeling: An analysis in terms of category accessibility . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 403-421.
Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473.
Chapman, G.B., & Johnson, E.J. (1999). Anchoring, activation, and the construction of values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 79, 1-39.
Chartrand, T.L., & Bargh, J.A. (1996). Automatic activation of impression formation and memorization goals: Nonconscious goal priming reproduces effects of explicit task instructions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 464-478.
DeCoster, J., & Claypool, H.M. (2004). A meta-analysis of priming effects on impression formation supporting a general model of informational biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 2-27.
DeMarree, K.G., Wheeler, S.C., & Petty, R.E. (2005). Priming a new identity: Self-monitoring moderates the effects of nonself primes on self-judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 657-671.
DeSteno, D., Petty, R.E., Wegener, D.T., & Rucker, D.D. (2000). Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: The role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 397-416.
Dijksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., Bargh, J.A., & van Knippenberg, A. (2000). On the relation between associative strength and automatic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 531-544.
Falces, C., Briñol, P., Sierra, B., Becerra, A., & Alier, E. (2001). Validación de la escala de necesidad de cognición y aplicación al estudio del cambio de actitudes [Validation of the need for cognition scale and application to the study of attitude change]. Psicothema, 13, 647-653.
Ford, T.E., & Kruglanski, A.W. (1995). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 950-962.
Forgas, J.P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM) . Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
Gawronski, B., Ehrenberg, K., Banse, R., Zukova, J., & Klauer, K.C. (2003). It's in the mind of the beholder: The impact of stereotypic associations on category-based and individuating impression formation . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 16-30.
Harkness, A.R., De Bono, K.G., & Borgida, E. (1985). Personal involvement and strategies for making contingency judgments: A stake in the dating game makes a difference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 22-32.
Haugtvedt, C.P., & Petty, R.E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 308-319.
Herr, P.M., Sherman, S.J., & Fazio, R.H. (1983). On the consequences of priming: Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 323-340.
Higgins, E.T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford.
Higgins, E.T., Rholes, W.S., & Jones, C.R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
Hull, J.G., Slone, L.B., Meteyer, K.B., & Matthews, A.R. (2002). The nonconsciousness of self-consciousness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 406-424.
Jarvis, C.B., MacKenzie, S.B., & Podsakoff, P.M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 199-218.
Markman, K.D., & McMullen, M.N. (2003). A reflection and evaluation model of comparative thinking. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 244-267.
Martin, L.L. (1986). Set/reset: Use and disuse of concepts in impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 493-504.
Martin, L.L., Seta, J.J., & Crelia, R.A. (1990). Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming an impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27-37.
McGuire, W.J. (1981). The probabilogical model of cognitive structure and attitude change. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 291-308). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110, 472-489.
Mussweiler, T., & Neumann, R. (2000). Sources of mental contamination: Comparing the effects of self-generated versus externally provided primes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 194-206.
Mussweiler, T., Ruter, K., & Epstude, K. (2004). The man who wasn't there: Subliminal social comparison standards influence self-evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 689-696.
Petty, R.E. (2001). Subtle influences on judgments and behaviors: Who is most susceptible? In J. P. Forgas & K. D. Williams (Eds.), Social influence: Direct and indirect processes (pp. 129-146). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Petty, R.E., Briñol, P., Loersch, C., & McCaslin, M.J. (in press). The need for cognition. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior. New York: Guilford.
Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic Press.
Petty, R.E., Haugtvedt, C.P., & Smith, S.M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior . In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 93-130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Petty, R.E., & Jarvis, W.B.G. (1996). An individual differences perspective on assessing cognitive processes. In N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Answering questions: Methodology for determining cognitive and communicative processes in survey research (pp. 221-257). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Petty, R.E., Schumann, D.W., Richman, S.A., & Strathman, A.J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high- and low-elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 5-20.
Petty, R.E., & Wegener, D.T. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context-induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137-165.
Priester, J.R., & Petty, R.E. (1995). Source attributions and persuasion: Perceived honesty as a determinant of message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 637-654.
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C.I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Smith, S.M., Haugtvedt, C.P., & Petty, R.E. (1994). Need for cognition and the effects of repeated expression on attitude accessibility and extremity. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 234-237.
Srull, T.K., & Wyer, R.S., Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
Stapel, D.A., & Koomen, W. (2000). How far do we go beyond the information given? The impact of knowledge activation on interpretation and inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 19-37.
Stapel, D.A., & Koomen, W. (2001). Let's not forget the past when we go to the future: On our knowledge of knowledge accessibility effects. In G. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition (pp. 229-246). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Strack, F., Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Kubler, A., & Wänke, M. (1993). Awareness of the influence as a determinant of assimilation versus contrast. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 53-62.
Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 289-338). New York: Academic Press.
Thompson, E.P., Roman, R.J., Moskowitz, G.B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J.A. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 474-489.
Wegener, D.T., Clark, J.K., & Petty, R.E. (2006). Not all stereotyping is created equal: Differential consequences of thoughtful versus nonthoughtful stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 42-59.
Wegener, D.T., & Petty, R.E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141-208). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Wheeler, S.C., DeMarree, K.G., & Petty, R.E. (2007). Understanding the role of the self in prime to behavior effects: The active self account. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 234-261.
Wheeler, S.C., Morrison, K.R., DeMarree, K.G., & Petty, R.E. (in press). Does self-consciousness increase or decrease priming effects? It depends. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: May 9, 2008
Issue published: July 2008
Keywords
PubMed: 18463396
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
View All Journal MetricsArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 628
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 63 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 58
- Short-Scale Construction Using Meta-Analytic Ant Colony Optimization
- CSR-company fit in the sin industry: addressing negative contributions, NFC, and perceived motives
- Phone and Self: How Smartphone Use Increases Preference for Uniqueness
- Estimating the effects of trait knowledge on social perception
- The inverse relation between risks and benefits: The impact of individual differences in information processing style
- Individual differences in social distancing and mask-wearing in the pandemic of COVID-19: The role of need for cognition, self-control and risk attitude
- I know what you are thinking: How theory of mind is employed in product evaluations
- A Heterophenomenological Framework for Analyzing User Experiences with Affordances
- The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology
- Toward a theory of media priming
- View More
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
SPSP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
SPSP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
