Challenges to Traditional Narratives of Intractable Conflict Decrease Ingroup Glorification
Abstract
Conflict narratives are cornerstones of group identity, but often facilitate violence by framing the group’s actions in ways that foster defensive forms of group identification (i.e., glorification). Three experiments tested whether alternative narratives inclusive of the ingroup’s and the adversarial group’s suffering can reduce glorification. Israeli Jews (Study 1) and Americans (Study 2) reported less glorification after reading inclusive narratives rather than narratives that dismiss the outgroup’s suffering. Study 3 found that through reducing glorification, inclusive narratives indirectly weakened support for retributive justice and militaristic policies and strengthened support for reconciliation. These effects were specific to people high in both (preexisting) glorification and attachment—people identified by prior research as the strongest supporters of violent approaches to conflict. These findings suggest that alternative narratives can reduce glorification by challenging the myopic focus of traditional conflict narratives on ingroup victimization, helping societies move beyond intractable conflict toward lasting peace.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Adelman L., Leidner B., Unal H., Nahhas E., Shnabel N. (2016). A whole other story: Inclusive victimhood narratives reduce competitive victimhood and intergroup hostility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1416-1430.
Adwan S., Bar-Tal D., Wexler B. (2016). Portrayal of the other in Palestinian and Israeli schoolbooks: A comparative study. Political Psychology, 37, 201-217.
Bandura A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193-209.
Bar-On D., Kassem F. (2004). Storytelling as a way to work through intractable conflicts: The German-Jewish experience and its relevance to the Palestinian-Israeli context. Journal of Social Issues, 60, 289-306.
Bar-Tal D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430-1453.
Bar-Tal D., Harel A. S. (2002). Teachers as agents of political influence in the Israeli high schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 121-134.
Baumeister R. F., Leary M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
Bilali R. (2013). National narrative and social psychological influences in Turks’ denial of the mass killings of Armenians as genocide. Journal of Social Issues, 69, 16-33.
Castano E. (2008). On the perils of glorifying the in-group: Intergroup violence, in-group glorification, and moral disengagement. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 154-170.
Chandler J., Mueller P., Paolacci G. (2013). Non-naivety among Amazon Mechanical Turk workers: Consequences and solutions for behavioral researchers. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 112-130.
Cohen J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Rev. ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Doosje B. E. J., Branscombe N. R., Spears R., Manstead A. S. R. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt: The effects of ingroup identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 325-338.
Fraley R. C., Vazire S. (2014). The N-pact factor: Evaluating the quality of empirical journals with respect to sample size and statistical power. PLoS ONE, 9, e109019.
Goh J. X., Hall J. A., Rosenthal R. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535-549.
Hammack P. L., Pilecki A. (2012). Narrative as a root metaphor for political psychology. Political Psychology, 33, 75-103.
Hayes A. F. (2013). Methodology in the social sciences. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Hirst W., Phelps E. A. (2016). Flashbulb memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 36-41.
Kelman H. C. (1999). Transforming the relationship between former enemies: A socialpsychological analysis. In Rothstein R. L. (Ed.), After the peace: Resistance and reconciliation (pp. 193-205). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Klar Y., Baram H. (2016). In DeFENCE of the in-group historical narrative in an intractable intergroup conflict: An individual-difference perspective. Political Psychology, 37, 37-53.
Klar Y., Bilewicz M. (2017). From socially motivated lay historians to lay censors: Epistemic conformity and defensive group identification. Memory Studies, 10, 334-346.
Klein R. A., Ratliff K. A., Vianello M., Adams R. B. Jr., Bahník Š., Bernstein M. J., . . . Nosek B. A. (2014). Investigating variation in replicability: A “many labs” replication project. Social Psychology, 45, 142-152.
Kosterman R., Feshbach S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10, 257-274.
Kupermintz H., Salomon G. (2005). Lessons to be learned from research on peace education in the context of intractable conflict. Theory into Practice, 44, 293-302.
Lakens D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 863.
Lakens D. (2014). Observed power, and what to do if your editor asks for post-hoc power analyses [blog post]. Retrieved from http://daniellakens.blogspot.com/2014/12/observed-power-and-what-to-do-if-your.html
Leach C. W., van Zomeren M., Zebel S., Vliek M. L. W., Pennekamp S. F., Doosje B., . . . Spears R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 144-165.
Leidner B. (2015). America and the age of genocide: Labeling a third-party conflict “genocide” decreases support for intervention among ingroup-glorifying Americans because they down-regulate guilt and perceived responsibility to intervene. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1623-1645.
Leidner B., Castano E. (2012). Morality shifting in the context of intergroup violence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 82-91.
Leidner B., Castano E., Ginges J. (2012). Dehumanization, retributive and restorative justice, and aggressive versus diplomatic intergroup conflict resolution strategies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 181-192.
Leidner B., Castano E., Zaiser E., Giner-Sorolla R. (2010). Ingroup glorification, moral disengagement, and justice in the context of collective violence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1115-1129.
Leidner B., Kardos P., Castano E. (2017). The effects of moral and pragmatic arguments against torture on demands for judicial reform. Political Psychology, 39, 143-162.
Li M., Leidner B., Euh H., Choi H.-S. (2016). The contagion of interstate violence: Reminders of historical interstate (but not intrastate) violence increase support for future violence against unrelated third-party states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1003-1024.
Li M., Leidner B., Petrović N., Orazani S. N., Rad M. S. (2018). The role of retributive justice and the use of international criminal tribunals in post-conflict reconciliation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, O133-O151.
Litman L., Robinson J., Abberbock T. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 433-442.
Nets-Zehngut R., Bar-Tal D. (2014). Transformation of the official memory of conflicts: A tentative model. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 27(1), 67-91.
Noor M., Brown R., Gonzalez R., Manzi G., Lewis C. A. (2008). On positive psychological outcomes: What helps groups with a history of conflict to forgive and reconcile with each other? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 819-832.
Noor M., Shnabel N., Halabi S., Nadler A. (2012). When suffering begets suffering: The psychology of competitive victimhood between adversarial groups in violent conflicts. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 351-374.
Oren N., Nets-Zehngut R., Bar-Tal D. (2015). Construction of the Israeli-Jewish conflict-supportive narrative and the struggle over its dominance. Political Psychology, 36, 215-230.
Paez D. R., Liu J. H.-F. (2011). Collective memory of conflicts. In Bar-Tal D. (Ed.), Frontiers of social psychology. Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 105-124). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
Putnick D. L., Bornstein M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90.
Reid S. A., Hogg M. A. (2005). Uncertainty reduction, self-enhancement, and ingroup identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 804-817.
Roccas S., Klar Y., Liviatan I. (2006). The paradox of group-based guilt: Modes of national identification, conflict vehemence, and reactions to the in-group’s moral violations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 698-711.
Roccas S., Sagiv L., Schwartz S., Halevy N., Eidelson R. (2008). Toward a unifying model of identification with groups: Integrating theoretical perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 280-306.
Ron Y., Maoz I. (2013). Dangerous stories: Encountering narratives of the other in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 19, 281-294.
Rubin M., Hewstone M. (2004). Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology, 25, 823-844.
Salomon G. (2004). Does peace education make a difference in the context of an intractable conflict? Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10, 257-274.
Shnabel N., Halabi S., Noor M. (2013). Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into a common victim or perpetrator identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 867-877.
Shnabel N., Nadler A., Ullrich J., Dovidio J. F., Carmi D. (2009). Promoting reconciliation through the satisfaction of the emotional needs of victimized and perpetrating group members: The needs-based model of reconciliation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1021-1030.
Staub E. (1997). Blind versus constructive patriotism: Moving from embeddedness in the group to critical loyalty and action. In Bar-Tal D., Staub E. (Eds.), Patriotism: In the lives of individuals and nations (pp. 213-228). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
Steiger J. (2004). Beyond the F test: Effect size confidence intervals and tests of close fit in the analysis of variance and contrast analysis. Psychological Methods, 9, 164-182.
Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Tajfel H., Turner J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin W. G., Worchel S. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
van de Schoot R., Lugtig P., Hox J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486-492.
Vollhardt J. R. (2009). The role of victim beliefs in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: Risk or potential for peace? Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15, 135-159.
Wenzel M., Okimoto T. G., Feather N. T., Pĺatow M. J. (2010). Justice through consensus: Shared identity and the preference for a restorative notion of justice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 909-930.
Wohl M., Branscombe N. (2008). Remembering historical victimization: Collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 988-1006.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
- mclamore_onlineappendix.pdf
- 166.48 KB
- supplemental_online_materials.pdf
- 329.81 KB
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: April 12, 2019
Issue published: December 2019
Keywords
PubMed: 30975037
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
View All Journal MetricsArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 1251
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 9 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 8
- Identifying stories of ‘us’: A mixed‐method analysis of the meaning, contents and associations of national narratives constructed by Americans
- May 2021 Riots by the Arab Minority in Israel: National, Civil or Religious?
- Not by Bread Alone: Immoderate Politics and the Roots of Suffering
- The distinct associations of ingroup attachment and glorification with responses to the coronavirus pandemic: Evidence from a multilevel investigation in 21 countries
- Turning the lens in the study of precarity: On experimental social psychology's acquiescence to the settler‐colonial status quo in historic Palestine
- National identity and beliefs about historical linguicide are associated with support for exclusive language policies among the Ukrainian linguistic majority
- Social Representations of Sociopolitical Groups on r/The_Donald and Emergent Conflict Narratives: A Qualitative Content Analysis
- Allegations of Mistreatment in an Era of Harm Avoidance: Taboos, Challenges, and Implications For Management
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
I am signed in as:
View my profileSign out
I can access personal subscriptions, purchases, paired institutional access and free tools such as favourite journals, email alerts and saved searches.
loading institutional access options
SPSP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
SPSP members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
