The Impact of Ownership Structure on Wage Intensity in Japanese Corporations
Abstract
The authors studied the effect of ownership structure on human capital investments as indicated by wage intensity, defined as the ratio of expenditure on employee wages to sales, in a sample of 996 Japanese manufacturing firms during their economic recession of 1998-2002. They found that domestic shareholders, with interests beyond financial considerations, enhance wage intensity, especially when performance is low, and thereby safeguard human capital investments. Foreign shareholders with sole interest in financial returns have an opposite effect; they reduce wage intensity when firm performance is low.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. 2003. The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: Dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28: 447-465.
Ahmadjian, C. L., & Robinson, P. 2001. Safety in numbers: Downsizing and deinstitutionalization of permanent employment in Japan. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 622-654.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Arellano, M. 2003. Panel data econometrics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Arellano, M., & Bond, S. 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58: 277-297.
Bank of Japan. 2001. Japan’s international investment position at year-end 2000. Bank of Japan Quarterly Bulletin, August: 79-104.
Barney, J. B., & Wright, P. M. 1998. On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37(1): 31-47.
Becker, G. S. 1964. Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. 1999. Is there discretion in wage setting? A test using takeover legislation. Rand Journal of Economics, 30: 535-554.
Blair, M. M., & Roe, M. J. (Eds.). 1999. Employees and corporate governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith, C. W. 1988. Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 267-291.
Brown, C., & Medhoff, J. L. 1988. The impact of firm acquisition on labor. In A. J. Auerbach (Ed.), Corporate takeovers: Causes and consequences: 9-32. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bushee, B. J. 1998. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review, 73: 305-333.
Carlock, R. S., & Florent-Treacy, E. 2002. The HP-Compaqmerger: A battle for the heart and soul of a company (Case Study 5064). Fountainbleu, France: INSEAD.
Cascio, W. F. 1993. Downsizing: What do we know? What have we learned? Academy of Management Executive, 7(1): 95-104.
Chang, S. J. 2003. Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 238-253.
Charkham, J. 1994. Keeping good companies: A study of corporate governance in five countries. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57: 2741-2771.
Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. 1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dalton, D., Daily, C., Ellstrand, A., & Johnson, J. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 269-290.
David, P., Kochhar, R., & Levitas, E. 1998. The effects of institutional investors on the level and mix of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 200-208.
Dess, G., Ireland, R., & Hitt, M. 1990. Industry effects and strategic management research. Journal of Management, 16: 7-27.
Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. 2000. Privatization in emerging economies: An agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25: 650-669.
Economic and Social Research Institute. 2002. http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/jp/sna/toukei.html.
Faccio, M., Lang, L. H. P., & Young, L. 2001. Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review, 91: 54-78.
Freeman, E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Gedajlovic, E., & Shapiro, D. M. 2002. Ownership structure and firm profitability in Japan. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 565-575.
Gedajlovic, E., Yoshikawa, T., & Hashimoto, M. 2005. Ownership structure, investment behaviour and firm performance in Japanese manufacturing industries. Organization Studies, 26: 7-35.
Gerlach, M. L. 1992. Alliance capitalism: The social organization of Japanese business. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. 1993. Understanding radical organizational change: Building together the old and new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21: 1022-1054.
Hambrick, D. C., & Finkelstein, S. 1995. The effects of ownership structure on conditions at the top: The case of CEO pay raises. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 175-193.
Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. 1992. Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 131-154.
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. 1996. The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1084-1119.
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. 2002. Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45: 697-716.
Huselid, M. A. 1995. The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 635-672.
Japan Corporate Governance Forum. 2004. Keynote speech (1). Nenpo (annual report): 1-8.
Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flows, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76: 323-329.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360.
Kikuchi, M. 1999. Revolution in corporate valuation (in Japanese). Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shimposha.
Kochhar, R., & David, P. 1995. Institutional investors and firm innovation: A test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 73-84.
Lee, P. M., & O’Neill, H. M. 2003. Ownership structures and R&D investments of U.S. and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 212-225.
Lincoln, J. R., Gerlach, M., & Ahmadjian, C. L. 1996. Keiretsu networks and corporate performance in Japan. American Sociological Review, 61: 67-88.
Lowenstein, R. 2004. The company they kept: The rise and fall of Adelphia. New York Times Magazine, February 1: 4-11.
McMillan, C. J. 1996. The Japanese industrial system (3rd ed.). Berlin: de Gruyter.
Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. 1992. Economics, organization, and management. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Morck, R., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation. Journal of Finance, 20: 293-315.
Mroczkowski, T., & Hanaoka, M. 1997. Effective rightsizing activities in Japan and America: Is there a convergence of employment practices? Academy of Management Executive, 11(2): 57-67.
Nakatani, I. 1984. The economic role of financial corporate grouping. In M. Aoki (Ed.), Economic analysis of the Japanese firm: 227-258. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 1999. OECD principles of corporate governance. Paris: Author.
Orwall, B., & Lubin, J. S. 2004. Disney shareholders’ revolt widens. Wall Street Journal, February 27: 1.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. 1983. The effects of ownership and performance on executive tenure in U.S. corporations. Academy of Management Journal, 23: 653-664.
Scheps, H. B. 1981. Effects of concentration on the wage-sales ratio. American Economist, 25(2): 55-59.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52: 737-783.
Sribney, W., Wiggins, V., & Drukker, D. 2003. Missing R-squared for 2SLS/IV. Stata FAQ. http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/2sls.html.
Stimpert, J. L., & Duhaime, I. M. 1997. Seeing the big picture: The influence of industry, diversification, and business strategy on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 560-583.
Suzuki, M. 2001. An analysis of corporate performance and incentives (in Japanese). Financial Review (Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance), December: 169-186.
Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. 2000. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 689-705.
Wahlgren, E. 2001. Spreading the Yankee way of pay. Business Week Online, April 18. http://www.businessweek.com/careers/content/apr2001/ca20010419_812.htm.
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, and relational contracting. New York: Free Press.
Yoshimori, M. 1995. Whose company is it? The concept of the corporation in Japan and in the West. Long Range Planning, 28(4): 33-44.
Zahra, S. A. 1996. Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39: 1713-1735.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published: April 2005
Issue published: April 2005
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Article usage*
Total views and downloads: 302
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 43 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 45
- Conflict or alignment? The role of return-oriented foreign shareholder...
- Geographic Concentration of Institutional Blockholders and Workplace S...
- The Wheel Comes Full Circle? An Integrated View of Organizational Resp...
- How Shareholders Impact Stakeholder Interests: A Review and Map for Fu...
- Does Performance Breed Slack? Ownership as a Contingency to the Perfor...
- Does Whipping Tournament Incentives Spur CSR Performance? An Empirical...
- Do US Firms Misinvest? The Role of Transnational Ownership to Firms’ I...
- A promise made is a promise kept: Union voice, HRM practices, implicit...
- How concentrated owners improve the performance of Asian firms
- Increased non‐family ownership in family‐owned firms: How does it affe...
- Proxy Advisors and Shareholder Dissent: A Cross-Country Comparative St...
- Relational Ownership and CEO Continuity: A Property Rights Perspective
- The governance impact of a changing investor landscape
- Impact of shareholder-value pursuit on labor policies at Japanese join...
- Leveraging foreign institutional logic in the adoption of stock option...
- Minding the Gap...
- A clash of governance logics: Foreign ownership and board monitoring
- Embedding human capital into governance design: a conceptual framework
- Corporate Ownership Structure and Top Executives’ Prosocial Preference...
- Owners and employees wages: a question of rent appropriability
- The influence of economic context on the relationship between chief ex...
- Reciprocity and R&D search: Applying the behavioral theory of the firm...
- Multiple Large Shareholder Structure and Governance: The Role of Share...
- Corporate boards and the performance of Asian firms: A meta-analysis
- Family CEOs: Do they benefit firm performance in China?
- The ‘Company with Committees’: Change or Continuity in Japanese Corpor...
- Cross-cultural impressions of leaders’ faces: Consensus and predictive...
- Disaggregating the group effect: Vertical and horizontal keiretsu in c...
- Shareholder Heterogeneity and Conflicting Goals: Strategic Investments...
- Ownership as a Form of Corporate Governance
- The impact of firm strategy and foreign ownership on executive bonus c...
- Does foreign investment matter? Effects of foreign investment on the i...
- Do Shareholders or Stakeholders Appropriate the Rents from Corporate D...
- The Influence of Board Monitoring, Executive Incentives, and Corporate...
- Changing Ownership and Governance Innovation
- Meta-analyzing ownership concentration and firm performance in Asia: T...
- Japanese keiretsu: Past, present, future
- Is synergy always good? Clarifying the effect of innovation capital an...
- The Role of the Board and Its Interaction with the Successor’s Human C...
- Ownership Structure and the Relationship Between Financial Slack and R...
- Change and continuity in Japanese corporate governance
- Principal—Principal Conflict in the Governance of the Chinese Public C...
- Japanese Corporate Governance: Structural Change and Financial Perform...
- Financial and product market integration: Responses of Japanese firms
- Strategic investments in Japanese corporations: do foreign portfolio o...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
SMA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
SMA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
