Multilevel modeling allows researchers to understand whether relationships between lower-level variables (e.g., individual job satisfaction and individual performance, firm capabilities and performance) change as a function of higher-order moderator variables (e.g., leadership climate, market-based conditions). We describe how to estimate such cross-level interaction effects and distill the technical literature for a general readership of management researchers, including a description of the multilevel model building process and an illustration of analyses and results with a data set grounded in substantive theory. In addition, we provide 10 specific best-practice recommendations regarding persistent and important challenges that researchers face before and after data collection to improve the accuracy of substantive conclusions involving cross-level interaction effects. Our recommendations provide guidance on how to define the cross-level interaction effect, compute statistical power and make research design decisions, test hypotheses with various types of moderator variables (e.g., continuous, categorical), rescale (i.e., center) predictors, graph the cross-level interaction effect, interpret interactions given the symmetrical nature of such effects, test multiple cross-level interaction hypotheses, test cross-level interactions involving more than two levels of nesting, compute effect-size estimates and interpret the practical importance of a cross-level interaction effect, and report results regarding the multilevel model building process.

Aguinis, H. 2004. Regression analysis for categorical moderators. New York: Guilford.
Google Scholar
Aguinis, H., Beaty, J. C., Boik, R. J., Pierce, C. A. 2005. Effect size and power in assessing moderating effects of categorical variables using multiple regression: A 30-year review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90: 94-107.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Aguinis, H., Boyd, B. K., Pierce, C. A., Short, J. C. 2011. Walking new avenues in management research methods and theories: Bridging micro and macro domains. Journal of Management, 37: 395-403.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., Wright, T. A. 2011. Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32: 1033-1043.
Google Scholar | ISI
Aguinis, H., Pierce, C. A., Bosco, F. A., Muslin, I. S. 2009. First decade of Organizational Research Methods: Trends in design, measurement, and data-analysis topics. Organizational Research Methods, 12: 69-112.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Aguinis, H., Werner, S., Abbott, J. L., Angert, C., Park, J. H., Kohlhausen, D. 2010. Customer-centric science: Reporting research results with rigor, relevance, and practical impact in mind. Organizational Research Methods, 13: 515-539.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Aiken, L. S., West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
American Psychological Association . 2009. Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards . 2008. Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63: 839-851.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Aytug, Z. G., Rothstein, H. R., Zhou, W., Kern, M. C. 2012. Revealed or concealed? Transparency of procedures, decisions, and judgment calls in meta-analyses. Organizational Research Methods, 15: 103-133.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Barney, J. B., Ketchen, D. J., Wright, M. 2011. The future of resource-based theory: Revitalization or decline? Journal of Management, 37: 1299-1315.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bedeian, A. G., Taylor, S. G., Miller, A. N. 2010. Management science on the credibility bubble: Cardinal sins and various misdemeanors. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9: 715-725.
Google Scholar | ISI
Bliese, P. D. 2000. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein, K. J., Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 349-381. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Bliese, P. D. 2002. Multilevel random coefficient modeling in organizational research: Examples using SAS and S-PLUS. In Drasgow, F., Schmitt, N. (Eds.), Measuring and analyzing behavior in organizations: Advances in measurement and data analysis: 401-445. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Bliese, P. D., Hanges, P. J. 2004. Being both too liberal and too conservative: The perils of treating grouped data as though they were independent. Organizational Research Methods, 7: 400-417.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bosker, R. J., Snijders, T. A. B., Guldemond, H. 2003. PINT (Power IN Two-level designs): Estimating standard errors of regression coefficients in hierarchical linear models for power calculations (Version 2.1). Groningen, Netherlands: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Google Scholar
Brutus, S., Aguinis, H., Wassmer, U. 2013. Self-reported limitations and future directions in scholarly reports: Analysis and recommendations. Journal of Management, 39: 48-75.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Carpenter, J. R., Goldstein, H., Rasbash, J. 2003. A novel bootstrap procedure for assessing the relationship between class size and achievement. Applied Statistics, 52: 431-443.
Google Scholar | ISI
Cascio, W. F., Aguinis, H. 2008. Staffing twenty-first-century organizations. Academy of Management Annals, 2: 133-165.
Google Scholar | ISI
Chen, G., Kirkman, B. L., Kanfer, R., Allen, D., Rosen, B. 2007. A multilevel study of leadership, empowerment, and performance in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92: 331-346.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Covin, J. G., Wales, W. J. 2012. The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36: 677-702.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Crainiceanu, C., Ruppert, D. 2004. Likelihood ratio tests in linear mixed models with one variance component. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society-B, 66: 165-185.
Google Scholar
Culpepper, S. A. 2010. Studying individual differences in predictability with gamma regression and nonlinear multilevel models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45: 153-185.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Culpepper, S. A., Aguinis, H. 2011. Using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with fallible covariates. Psychological Methods, 16: 166-178.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Dalal, D. K., Zickar, M. J. 2012. Some common myths about centering predictor variables in moderated multiple regression and polynomial regression. Organizational Research Methods, 15: 339-362.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Dalton, D. R., Aguinis, H. 2013. Measurement malaise in strategic management studies: The case of corporate governance research. Organizational Research Methods, 16: 88-99.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Dalton, D. R., Aguinis, H., Dalton, C. A., Bosco, F. A., Pierce, C. A. 2012. Revisiting the file drawer problem in meta-analysis: An empirical assessment of published and non-published correlation matrices. Personnel Psychology, 65: 221-249.
Google Scholar | ISI
Davison, M. L., Kwak, N., Seo, Y. S., Choi, J. 2002. Using hierarchical linear models to examine moderator effects: Person-by-organization interactions. Organizational Research Methods, 5: 231-254.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Enders, C. K., Tofighi, D. 2007. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12: 121-138.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Field, C. A., Welsh, A. H. 2007. Bootstrapping clustered data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society-B, 69: 369-390.
Google Scholar
Gelfand, A. E., Sahu, S. K., Carlin, B. P. 1995. Efficient parametrisations for normal linear mixed models. Biometrika, 82: 479-488.
Google Scholar | ISI
Han, J. 2005. Crossover linear modeling: Combining multilevel heterogeneities in crossover relationships. Organizational Research Methods, 8: 290-316.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hedges, L. V., Hedberg, E. C. 2007. Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29: 60-87.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hofmann, D. A., Gavin, M. B. 1998. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Theoretical and methodological implications for organizational science. Journal of Management, 24: 623-641.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hox, J. 2010. Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Kahn, J. H. 2011. Multilevel modeling: Overview and applications to research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 58: 257-271.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Kenny, D. A., Judd, C. M. 1996. A general procedure for the estimation of interdependence. Psychological Bulletin, 119: 138-148.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Konstantopolous, S. 2008a. The power of the test for treatment effects in three-level block randomized designs. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1: 265-288.
Google Scholar
Konstantopolous, S. 2008b. The power of the test for treatment effects in three-level cluster randomized designs. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1: 66-88.
Google Scholar
Kozlowski, S. W. J., Klein, K. J. 2000. A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In Klein, K. J., Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions: 3-90. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Kreft, I., De Leeuw, J. 1998. Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Liden, R. C., Antonakis, J. 2009. Considering context in psychological leadership research. Human Relations, 62: 1587-1605.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Maas, C. J. M., Hox, J. J. 2004. The influence of violations of assumptions on multilevel parameter estimates and their standard errors. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 46: 427-440.
Google Scholar | ISI
Mathieu, J. E., Aguinis, H., Culpepper, S. A., Chen, G. 2012. Understanding and estimating the power to detect cross-level interaction effects in multilevel modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 951-966.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Mathieu, J. E., Chen, G. 2011. The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. Journal of Management, 37: 610-641.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Maxwell, S. E. 2004. The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: Causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychological Methods, 9: 147-163.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Molloy, J. C., Ployhart, R. E., Wright, P. M. 2011. The myth of “the” micro-macro divide: Bridging system-level and disciplinary divides. Journal of Management, 37: 581-609.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Peugh, J. L. 2010. A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48: 85-112.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Pierce, J. R., Aguinis, H. 2013. The too-much-of-a-good-thing effect in management. Journal of Management, 39: 313-338.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., Bauer, D. J. 2006. Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31: 437-448.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., Zhang, Z. 2010. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15: 209-233.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Raudenbush, S. W. 1997. Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 2: 173-185.
Google Scholar | ISI
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S. 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., Liu, X. 2000. Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. Psychological Methods, 5: 199-213.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Raudenbush, S. W., Rowan, B., Cheong, Y. F. 1993. The pursuit of higher-order instructional goals in secondary schools: Class, teacher, and school influences. American Educational Research Journal, 30: 523-553.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Roberts, J. K., Monaco, J. P., Stovall, H., Foster, V. 2011. Explained variance in multilevel models. In Hox, J. J., Roberts, J. K. (Eds.), Handbook of advanced multilevel analysis: 219-230. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Scheipl, F., Greven, S., Kuechenhoff, H. 2008. Size and power of tests for a zero random effect variance or polynomial regression in additive and linear mixed models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 52: 3283-3299.
Google Scholar | ISI
Scherbaum, C. A., Ferreter, J. M. 2009. Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12: 347-367.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Singer, J. D. 1998. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24: 323-355.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Snijders, T. A. B. 2005. Power and sample size in multilevel linear models. In Everitt, B. S., Howell, D. C. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science, vol. 3: 1570-1573. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., Bosker, R. J. 2012. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Spybrook, J., Bloom, H., Congdon, R., Hill, C., Martinez, A., Raudenbush, S. W. 2011. Optimal design plus empirical evidence: Documentation for the “Optimal Design” software (version 3.0). Retrieved from http://www.wtgrantfoundation.org/resources/consultation-service-and-optimal-design.
Google Scholar
Stram, D., Lee, J. W. 1994. Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics, 50: 1171-1177.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Uy, M. A., Foo, M. D., Aguinis, H. 2010. Using event sampling methodology to advance entrepreneurship theory and research. Organizational Research Methods, 13: 31-54.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wolfinger, R., O’Connell, M. 2007. Generalized linear mixed models: A pseudo-likelihood approach. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 48: 233-243.
Google Scholar | ISI
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

JOM-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $284.88

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top