Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 20, 2018

Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography of the Normal Prostate: Interobserver Reproducibility and Comparison with Functional Magnetic Resonance Tissue Characteristics

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish interobserver reproducibility of Young’s modulus (YM) derived from ultrasound shear wave elastography (US-SWE) in the normal prostate and correlate it with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) tissue characteristics. Twenty men being screened for prostate cancer underwent same-day US-SWE (10 done by two blinded, newly-trained observers) and mpMRI followed by 12-core biopsy. Bland–Altman plots established limits of agreement for YM. Quantitative data from the peripheral zone (PZ) and the transitional zone (TZ) for YM, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, mm2/s from diffusion-weighted MRI), and Ktrans (volume transfer coefficient, min−1), Ve (extravascular-extracellular space, %), Kep (rate constant, /min), and initial area under the gadolinium concentration curve (IAUGC60, mmol/L/s) from dynamic contrast–enhanced MRI were obtained for slice-matched prostate sextants. Interobserver intraclass correlation coefficients were fair to good for individual regions (PZ = 0.57, TZ = 0.65) and for whole gland 0.67, (increasing to 0.81 when corrected for systematic observer bias). In the PZ, there were weak negative correlations between YM and ADC (p = 0.008), and Ve (p = 0.01) and a weak positive correlation with Kep (p = 0.003). No significant intermodality correlations were seen in the TZ. Transrectal prostate US-SWE done without controlling manually applied probe pressure has fair/good interobserver reproducibility in inexperienced observers with potential to improve this to excellent by standardization of probe contact pressure. Within the PZ, increase in tissue stiffness is associated with reduced extracellular water (decreased ADC) and space (reduced Ve).

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Correas JM, Tissier AM, Khairoune A, Khoury G, Eiss D, Hélénon O. Ultrasound elastography of the prostate: state of the art. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013; 94: 551-60.
2. Kamoi K, Okihara K, Ochiai A, Ukimura O, Mizutani Y, Kawauchi A, et al. The utility of transrectal real-time elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:1025-1032.
3. Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CF, Fromageau J, Bojunga J, Calliada F, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34:169-184.
4. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber J, Bojunga J, Correas JM, Gilja OH, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: clinical applications. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34:238-253.
5. Woo S, Kim SY, Cho JY, Kim SH. Shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a preliminary study. Korean J Radiol. 2014;15:346-355.
6. Ginat DT, Destounis SV, Barr RG, Castaneda B, Strang JG, Rubens DJ. US elastography of breast and prostate lesions. Radiographics. 2009;29:2007-2016.
7. Barr RG, Memo R, Schaub CR. Shear wave ultrasound elastography of the prostate: initial results. Ultrasound Q. 2012;28:13-20.
8. Correas JM, Tissier AM, Khairoune A, Vassiliu V, Méjean A, Hélénon O, et al. Prostate cancer: diagnostic performance of real-time shear-wave elastography. Radiology. 2015;275:280-289.
9. Boehm K, Salomon G, Beyer B, Schiffmann J, Simonis K, Graefen M, et al. Shear wave elastography for localization of prostate cancer lesions and assessment of elasticity thresholds: implications for targeted biopsies and active surveillance protocols. J Urol. 2015;193:794-800.
10. Boehm K, Budaus L, Tennstedt P, Beyer B, Schiffmann J, Larcher A, et al. Prediction of significant prostate cancer at prostate biopsy and per core detection rate of targeted and systematic biopsies using real-time shear wave elastography. Urol Int. 2015;95:189-196.
11. Zhai L, Polascik TJ, Foo WC, Rosenzweig S, Palmeri ML, Madden J, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging of human prostates: initial in vivo demonstration. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38:50-61.
12. Palmeri ML, Glass TJ, Miller ZA, Rosenzweig SJ, Buck A, Polascik TJ, et al. Identifying clinically significant prostate cancers using 3-D in vivo acoustic radiation force impulse imaging with whole-mount histology validation. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:1251-1262.
13. Woo S, Kim SY, Lee MS, Cho JY, Kim SH. Shear wave elastography assessment in the prostate: an intraobserver reproducibility study. Clin Imaging. 2015;39:484-487.
14. Mun HS, Choi SH, Kook SH, Choi Y, Jeong WK, Kim Y. Validation of intra- and interobserver reproducibility of shearwave elastography: phantom study. Ultrasonics. 2013;53:1039-1043.
15. Vargas HA, Hotker AM, Goldman DA, Moskowitz CS, Gondo T, Matsumoto K, et al. Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:1606-1612.
16. Waseda Y, Yoshida S, Takahara T, Kwee TC, Matsuoka Y, Saito K, et al. Utility of computed diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting aggressiveness of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46:490-496.
17. Peng Y, Jiang Y, Antic T, Giger ML, Eggener SE, Oto A. Validation of quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images for prostate cancer detection and aggressiveness assessment: a cross-imager study. Radiology. 2014;271:461-471.
18. deSouza NM, Riches SF, Vanas NJ, Morgan VA, Ashley SA, Fisher C, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer. Clin Radiol. 2008;63:774-782.
19. Oderda M, Faletti R, Battisti G, Dalmasso E, Falcone M, Marra G, et al. Prostate cancer detection rate with Koelis fusion biopsies versus cognitive biopsies: a comparative study. Urol Int. 2016;97:230-237.
20. Dietrich C, Bamber J, Berzigotti A, Bota S, Cantisani V, Castera L, et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of liver ultrasound elastography, update 2017. Ultraschall Med. 2017;38:e16-e47.
21. d’Arcy JA, Collins DJ, Padhani AR, Walker-Samuel S, Suckling J, Leach MO. Informatics in Radiology (infoRAD): magnetic resonance imaging workbench: analysis and visualization of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging data. Radiographics. 2006;26:621-632.
22. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6:284-290.
23. Harris LN. Goodness-of-fit techniques,Ralph B. D’Agostino, Michael A. Stephens (eds). Marcel Dekker Inc. 1986. No. of pages: 560. Price: $79.75 (U.S.A. and Canada); $95.50 (elsewhere). Qual Reliab Eng Int. 1987;3:71.
24. Fraquelli M, Baccarin A, Casazza G, Conti CB, Giunta M, Massironi S, et al. Liver stiffness measurement reliability and main determinants of point shear-wave elastography in patients with chronic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44:356-365.
25. Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, Lissandrin R, Zicchetti M, Bernuzzi S, Salvaneschi L, et al. Ultrasound point shear wave elastography assessment of liver and spleen stiffness: effect of training on repeatability of measurements. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1283-1289.
26. Han SH, Ackerstaff E, Stoyanova R, Carlin S, Huang W, Koutcher JA, et al. Gaussian mixture model-based classification of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data for identifying diverse tumor microenvironments: preliminary results. NMR Biomed. 2013;26:519-532.
27. Selnaes KM, Vettukattil R, Bertilsson H, Wright AJ, Heerschap A, Angelsen A, et al. Tissue microstructure is linked to MRI parameters and metabolite levels in prostate cancer. Front Oncol. 2016;6:146.
28. Noworolski SM, Vigneron DB, Chen AP, Kurhanewicz J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and MR diffusion imaging to distinguish between glandular and stromal prostatic tissues. Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;26:1071-1080.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 20, 2018
Issue published: May 2018

Keywords

  1. ultrasound shear wave elastography
  2. prostate cancer
  3. diffusion-weighted MRI
  4. dynamic contrast–enhanced
  5. reproducibility

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2018.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 29353529

Authors

Affiliations

Hugh Harvey
Cancer Research UK Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
Veronica Morgan
Cancer Research UK Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
Jeremie Fromageau
Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
Tuathan O’Shea
Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
Jeffrey Bamber
Cancer Research UK Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
Nandita M. deSouza
Cancer Research UK Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK

Notes

Nandita M. DeSouza, MRI Unit, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Ultrasonic Imaging.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 240

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 10 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 11

  1. Influence of transducer pressure and examiner experience on muscle act...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Transrectal Ultrasonography and Elastography in Carcinoma Prostate
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Application of Shear Wave Elastography and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasoun...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Prostate Cancer Gleason Score From Biopsy to Radical Surgery: Can Ultr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. A Nomogram Based on a Multiparametric Ultrasound Radiomics Model for D...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Characterisation of Prostate Lesions Using Transrectal Shear Wave Elas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Quantitative Evaluation of Shear Wave Elastography on Radiation-Induce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound and quantitative and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Shear-wave elastography: role in clinically significant prostate cance...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Spatiotemporal switching signals for cancer stem cell activation in pe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text