Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published March 1992

Enhancement of Validity Through Qualitative Approaches: Incorporating the Patient's Perspective

Abstract

Validity of research in a medical environment is enhanced through incorporating the patient's perspective by using qualitative approaches. Our efforts to improve the validity of measures led us to examine the research process more broadly through mechanisms ofpatientparticipation: a protocol adviser, a participantadvisory panel, and focus groups. In our research program of biopsychosocial HIVstudies in the military population, feedback from patient participants provided the research staff with information important for refining standard measures, improving the research process, and interpreting the quantitative data analyses.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association . (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
Chen, H-T. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Cronbach, L. J. (1971). Test validation. In R. L Thorndike (Ed.),Educational measurement (2nd ed., pp. 443-507). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Friedson, E. (1961). Patients' view of medical practice. New York: Free Press.
Krueger, R. A. (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Leventhal, H. (1985). The role of theory in the study of adherence to treatments and doctorpatient interactions. Medical Care, 23, 556-563.
Merton, R., Fiske, M., Kendall, P. (1956). The focused interview. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Levin (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 3-10). New York: Macmillan.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. New York: Free Press.
Pedhazur, E. J., & Schmedlin, L. P. (1991). Measuremen4 design, and analysis: An integrated approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sharf, B. F. (1988). Teaching patients to speak up: Past and future trends. Patient Education Counseling, 11, 95-108.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: March 1992
Issue published: March 1992

Rights and permissions

Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 10117741

Authors

Affiliations

Martha Ann Carey
National Center for Nursing Research
Mickey W. Smith
Henry M. Jackson Foundation for, the Advancement of Military Medicine

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Evaluation & the Health Professions.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 63

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 10 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 18

  1. Patient and public involvement in HIV research: a mapping review and development of an online evidence map
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Evaluation of a project to engage patients in the development of a patient‐reported measure for HIV care (the I‐Score Study)
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Comparing Information from Focus-Group Interviews with That Obtained by Surveys in An ESL Environment
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. A Mutual Catalytic Model of Formative Evaluation
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Adjustment to an Artificial Limb: A Qualitative Perspective
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle ScholarPub Med
  7. Stakeholder Participation for the Purpose of Helping Ensure Evaluation Validity: Bridging the Gap Between Collaborative and Non-collaborative Evaluations
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Focus Groups in Mental Health Research: Enhancing the Validity of User and Provider Questionnaires
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle ScholarPub Med
  9. Achieving a 96.6 percent follow-up rate in a longitudinal study of drug abusers
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Assessing physician empathy using the interpersonal reactivity index: A measurement model and cross-sectional analysis
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

AEA and AES members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


AEA and AES members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.



Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB