![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Whistleblowing is the act of disclosing information from a public or private organization in order to reveal cases of corruption that are of immediate or potential danger to the public. Blowing the whistle involves personal risk, especially when legal protection is absent, and charges of betrayal, which often come in the form of legal prosecution under treason laws. In this article we argue that whistleblowing is justified when disclosures are made with the proper intent and fulfill specific communicative constraints in addressing issues of public interest. Three communicative constraints of informativeness, truthfulness and evidence are discussed in this regard. We develop a ‘harm test’ to assess the intent for disclosures, concluding that it is not sufficient for justification. Along with the proper intent, a successful act of whistleblowing should provide information that serves the public interest. Taking cognizance of the varied conceptions of public interest, we present an account of public interest that fits the framework of whistleblowing disclosures. In particular, we argue that whistleblowing is justified inter alia when the information it conveys is of a presumptive interest for a public insofar as it reveals an instance of injustice or violation of a civil or political right done against and unbeknown to some members of a polity.
References
|
Barry, Brian (1965) Political Argument: A Reissue with New Introduction. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar | |
|
Berkowitz, Roger (2014) ‘The Conscience of Edward Snowden’, The Hannah Arendt Center for Politics and Humanities, accessed 15 March 2017, accessible @: http://hac.bard.edu/news/?url=the-conscience-of-edward-snowden/ Google Scholar | |
|
Bok, Sissela (1980) ‘Whistleblowing and Professional Responsibilities’, in Callahan, Daniel, Bok, Sissela (eds) Ethics Teaching in Higher Education. New York and London: Plenum Press, pp. 277–95. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bok, Sissela (1983) Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. New York: Vintage. Google Scholar | |
|
Bowie, Norman (1982) Business Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar | |
|
Brownlee, Kimberley (2016) ‘The Civil Disobedience of Edward Snowden: A Reply to William Scheuerman’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 42(10): 965–70. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Celikates, Robin (2016a) ‘Democratizing Civil Disobedience’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 42(10): 982–94. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Celikates, Robin (2016b) ‘Rethinking Civil Disobedience as a Practice of Contestation – Beyond the Liberal Paradigm’, Constellations 23(1): 37–45. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Corvino, John (2002) ‘Loyalty in Business?’, Journal of Business Ethics 41(1): 179–85. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Davis, Michael (1996) ‘Some Paradoxes of Whistleblowing’, Business & Professional Ethics Journal 15(1): 3–19. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
De George, Richard (2014) ‘Whistleblowing’, in Hoffman, Michael W., Frederick, Robert E., Schwartz, Mark S. (eds) Business Ethics: Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality. Chichester, Sx: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 320–38. Google Scholar | |
|
Delmas, Candice (2014) ‘The Civic Duty to Report Crime and Corruption’, Les ateliers de l’éthique/The Ethics Forum 9(1): 50–64. Centre de recherche en éthique de l’Université de Montréal. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Delmas, Candice (2015) ‘The Ethics of Government Whistleblowing’, Social Theory and Practice 41(1): 77–105. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Downs, Anthony (1962) ‘The Public Interest: Its Meaning in a Democracy’, Social Research 29(1): 1–36. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Duska, Ronald (2007) Contemporary Reflections on Business Ethics. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar | |
|
Elliston, Frederick A. (1982) ‘Anonymity and Whistleblowing’, Journal of Business Ethics 1(3): 167–77. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Flathman, Richard E. (1966) The Public Interest: An Essay concerning the Normative Discourse of Politics. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Greenwald, Glenn (2014) No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the US Surveillance State. [n.p.]: Macmillan (Kindle edn). Google Scholar | |
|
Grice, Paul H. (1975) ‘Logic and Conversation’, in his Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Ha rvard University Press, pp. 22–40. Google Scholar | |
|
Held, Virginia (1970) The Public Interest and Individual Interests. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Jubb, Peter B. (1999) ‘Whistleblowing: A Restrictive Definition and Interpretation’, Journal of Business Ethics 21(1): 77–94. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Kamm, Frances M. (2008) ‘Terrorism and Intending Evil’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 36(2): 157–86. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
King, Stephen M., Chilton, Bradley S., Roberts, Gary E. (2010) ‘Reflections on Defining the Public Interest’, Administration & Society 41(8): 954–78. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Larmer, Robert A. (1992) ‘Whistleblowing and Employee Loyalty’, Journal of Business Ethics 11(2): 125–8. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
McConnell, Terrance (2003) ‘Whistle-blowing’, in Frey, Raymond G., Wellman, Christopher H. (eds) A Companion to Applied Ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 570–82. Google Scholar | |
|
McMahan, Jeff (2009) ‘Intention, Permissibility, Terrorism, and War’, Philosophical Perspectives 23(1): 345–72. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Moore, Adam D. (2011) ‘Privacy, Security and Government Surveillance: Wikileaks and the new Accountability’, Public Affairs Quarterly 25(2): 141–56. Google Scholar | |
|
O’Flynn, Ian (2010) ‘Deliberating about the Public Interest’, Res publica 16(3): 299–315. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 , accessible @: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/23/contents Google Scholar | |
|
Rawls, John (1999) A Theory of Justice, rev. edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Rothschild, Joyce, Miethe, Terance D. (1999) ‘Whistle-blower Disclosures and Management Retaliation: The Battle to Control Information about Organization Corruption’, Work and Occupations 26(1): 107–28. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Sagar, Rahul (2013a) Secrets and Leaks: The Dilemma of State Secrecy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sagar, Rahul (2013b) ‘Who Decides What’s Secret: Obama, or Snowden?’, CNN.com (15 June), accessed 5 March 2017, accessible @: http://edition.cnn.com/2013/06/14/opinion/sagar-snowden-secrets/ Google Scholar | |
|
Sagar, Rahul (2015) ‘Against Moral Absolutism: Surveillance and Disclosure After Snowden’, Ethics & International Affairs 29(2): 145–59. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Santoro, Daniele, Kumar, Manohar, Ferrante, Leonardo, Turola, Martina, Quaranta, Francesco (2014) Blowing the Whistle on Corruption. Campaign for an European Directive in Defence of Whistleblowers – Summary Report. Google Scholar | |
|
Scanlon, Thomas M. (2009) Moral Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Scheuerman, William E. (2014) ‘Whistleblowing as Civil Disobedience: The Case of Edward Snowden’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 40(7): 609–28. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Scheuerman, William E. (2016) ‘Digital Disobedience and the Law’, New Political Science 38(3): 299–314. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Thomson, Judith Jarvis (1991) ‘Self-defense’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 20(4): 283–310. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
U.S. Code, Title 5, Part II, Chapter 12, Subchapter II, § 1213 – Provisions relating to disclosures of violations of law, gross mismanagement, and certain other matters, accessed 9 April 2016, accessible @: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/1213 Google Scholar | |
|
Vandekerckhove, Wim, Commers, M. S. Ronald (2004) ‘Whistle Blowing and Rational Loyalty’, Journal of Business Ethics 53(1): 225–33. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Velasquez, Manuel G. (2006) Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases, vol. 111. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar |
