Father Involvement, Father–Child Relationship Quality, and Satisfaction With Family Work: Actor and Partner Influences on Marital Quality

First Published March 8, 2013 Research Article

Authors

1
 
University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
by this author
, 2
 
Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, USA
by this author
, 1
 
University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
by this author
,
3
 
Utah State University Regional Campus, Brigham City, UT, USA
by this author
...
First Published Online: March 8, 2013

Using family systems theory and an actor–partner interdependence model, we examine the influence of the division of family work (including fathers’ participation in child rearing) on father–child relationship quality, satisfaction with the family work division, and marital quality. The strongest effect on both spouses’ marital quality is wives’ perception of father–child relationship quality. Following this, wives’ perceptions of father participation in child rearing are positively associated with both spouses’ reports of marital quality. Furthermore, both husbands and wives report higher marital quality when they are more satisfied with the division of labor. When wives report their husbands have greater responsibility for family tasks, both spouses report higher satisfaction with the division of labor. Post hoc analyses revealed that wives are more satisfied with the division of labor when they work with their spouse rather than alone. All findings support a systemic relational orientation to family work, the division of roles, and relationship quality.

Bahr, H. M., Bahr, K. S. (2009). Toward more family-centered family sciences: Love, sacrifice, and transcendence. New York, NY: Lexington Books.
Google Scholar
Barnett, R. C., Shen, Y.-C. (1997). Gender, high- and low-schedule-control housework tasks, and psychological distress. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 403-428. doi:10.1177/019251397018004003
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bartley, S. J., Blanton, P. W., Gilliard, J. L. (2005). Husbands and wives in dual-earner marriages: Decision-making, gender role attitudes, division of household labor, and equity. Marriage & Family Review, 37(4), 69-94. doi:10.1300/J002v37n04_05
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bianchi, S., Robinson, J. P., Milkie, M. A. (2006). Changing rhythms of American family life. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar
Bird, G. W., Bird, G. A., Scruggs, M. (1984). Determinants of family task sharing: A study of husbands and wives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 345-355.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bond, J., Galinsky, E., Swanberg, J. (1998). The national study of the changing workforce. New York, NY: Families and Work Institute.
Google Scholar
Bradbury, T., Fincham, F., Beach, S. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 964-980.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., Larson, J. H. (1995). A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 289-308.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar
Callahan, C. A. (1997). Internal consistency, reliability, and concurrent validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Quality Marriage Index. Psychological Reports, 80, 49-50. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1997.80.1.49
Google Scholar | Crossref
Claffey, S. T., Mickelson, K. D. (2009). Division of household labor and distress: The role of perceived fairness for employed mothers. Sex Roles, 60, 819-831. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9578-0
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Coleman, M. T. (1988). The division of household labor: Suggestions for future empirical consideration and theoretical development. Journal of Family Issues, 9, 132-148.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208-1233.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Crosbie-Burnett, M. (1984). The centrality of the step relationship: A challenge to family theory and practice. Family Relations, 33, 459-464.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cummings, E. M., Goeke-Morey, M. C., Raymond, J. (2004). Fathers in family context: Effects of marital quality and marital conflict. In Lamb, M. E. (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (4th ed., pp. 196-221). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Cunningham, M. (2005). Gender in cohabitation and marriage: The influence of gender ideology on housework allocation over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 1037-1061. doi:10.1177/0192513X04273592
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
DeVault, M. L. (1991). Feeding the family: The social organization of caring work as gendered work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Dew, J., Wilcox, W. B. (2011). If momma ain’t happy: Explaining declines in marital satisfaction among new mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73, 1-12. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00782.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis (Methodology in the Social Sciences). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Fincham, F., Hall, J. (2005). Parenting and the marital relationship. In Luster, T., Okagaki, L. (Eds.), Parenting: An ecological perspective (pp. 205-234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Finley, G. E. (1998). Parental age and parenting quality as perceived by late adolescents. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 159, 505-506. doi:10.1080/00221329809596167
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Finley, G. E., Schwartz, S. (2004). The Father Involvement and Nurturant Fathering Scales: Retrospective measures for adolescent and adult children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 143-164. doi:10.1177/0013164403258453
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Fox, B. (2009). When couples become parents: The creation of gender in the transition to parenthood. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ganong, L., Coleman, M., Fine, M., Martin, P. (1999). Stepparents’ affinity-seeking and affinity-maintaining strategies with stepchildren. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 299-327.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Goeke-Morey, M. C., Cummings, E. M. (2007). Impact of father involvement: A closer look at indirect effects models involving marriage and child adjustment. Applied Developmental Science, 11(4), 1-5. doi:10.1080/10888690701762126
Google Scholar | Crossref
Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Husbands’ participation in domestic labor: Interactive effects of wives’ and husbands’ gender ideologies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 585-595.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Grote, N. K., Naylor, K. E., Clark, M. S. (2002). Perceiving the division of family work to be unfair: Do social comparisons, enjoyment, and competence matter? Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 510-522. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.16.4.510
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Hawkins, A. J., Bradford, K. P., Palkovitz, R., Christiansen, S. L., Day, R. D., Call, V. R. A. (2002). The inventory of father involvement: A pilot study of a new measure of father involvement. Journal of Men’s Studies, 10, 183-196. doi:10.3149/jms.1002.183
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Holmes, E. K., Baumgartner, J., Marks, L. D., Palkovitz, R., Nesteruk, O. (2010). Contemporary contradictions and challenges facing married fathers and mothers. In Columbus, F. (Ed.), Marriage: Roles, stability, and conflict (pp. 157-171). Hauppage, NY: Nova Science.
Google Scholar
Holmes, E. K., Duncan, T., Bair, S., White, A. (2007). How mothers and fathers help each other count. In Brotherson, S. E., White, J. M. (Eds.), Why fathers count (pp. 43-58). Harriman, TN: Men’s Studies Press.
Google Scholar
Holmes, E. K., Huston, A. C. (2010). Understanding positive father-child interaction: Children’s, fathers’, and mothers’ contributions. Fathering: A Journal of Research, Theory, and Practice about Men as Fathers, 8, 203-225. doi:10.3149/fth.0802.203
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 233-265). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis (Methodology in the Social Sciences). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Kluwer, E. S., Heesink, J. A. M., Van, de, Vliert, E. (1996). Marital conflict about the division of household labor and paid work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 958-969.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lamb, M. E., Pleck, J. H., Charnov, E. L., Levine, J. A. (1985). Paternal behavior in humans. American Zoologist, 25, 883-894.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lemay, E. P., Clark, M. S., Feeney, B. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 834-853. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.834
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Lennon, M. C., Rosenfeld, S. (1994). Relative fairness and the division of housework: The importance of options. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 506-531.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Macho, S., Ledermann, T. (2011). Estimating, testing, and comparing specific effects in structural equation models: The phantom model approach. Psychological Methods, 16, 34-43. doi:10.1037/a0021763
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Pleck, J. H. (1985). Working wives, working husbands. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., Clark, M. S., Holmes, J. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In Mashek, D., Aron, A. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201-225). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Schramm, D., Marshall, J., Harris, V., Lee, T. (2005). After I do: The newlywed transition. Marriage & Family Review, 38(1), 45-67. doi:10.1300/J002v38n01_05
Google Scholar | Crossref
Schumm, W. R., Paff-Bergan, L. A., Hatch, R. C., Obiorah, F. C., Copeland, J. M., Meens, L. D. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381-387.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Stevens, D. P., Kiger, G., Mannon, S. E. (2005). Domestic labor and marital satisfaction: How much or how satisfied? Marriage & Family Review, 37(4), 49-67. doi:10.1300/J002v37n04_04
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stevens, D. P., Minnotte, K. L., Mannon, S. E., Kiger, G. (2007). Examining the “neglected side of the work-family interface”: Antecedents of positive and negative family-to-work spillover. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 242-262. doi:10.1177/0192513X06294548
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women’s sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181-196. doi:10.1177/019251391012002003
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wilcox, B., Nock, S. (2006). What’s love got to do with it? Equality, equity, and women’s marital quality. Social Forces, 84, 1321-1345.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Williams, S. M., Finley, G. E. (1997). Father contact and perceived affective quality of fathering in Trinidad. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 31, 315-319.
Google Scholar

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

JFI-article-ppv for GBP29.00
JFI-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP167.66
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $214.95