A firm grounding in change theory can provide educational leaders with an opportunity to orchestrate meaningful organizational improvements. This article provides an opportunity for practicing leaders to review four major theories of organizational change—continuous improvement, two approaches to organizational learning, and appreciative inquiry. These four theories were selected because of their emergence within the field of education, possible adaptability to school systems, and potential to support organizational change. Such theories can provide clear guidelines for successful organizational transformation, promote effective change management, and facilitate operative decision making.

Argyris, C., Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
City, E. A., Elmore, R. F., Fiarman, S. E., Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Google Scholar
Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D. (2007). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. In Holman, P., Devane, T., Cady, S. (Eds.), The change handbook: The definitive resource on today’s best methods for engaging whole systems (2nd ed., pp. 73-88). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Google Scholar
Cooperrider, D. L., Whitney, D., Stavros, J. M. (2005). Appreciative inquiry handbook: The first in a series of AI workbooks for leaders of change. Brunswick, OH: Crown.
Google Scholar
Danielson, C., McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Google Scholar
Deming, W. E. (2000). Out of the crisis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Evans, L. M. (2010). The congruence of mental models amongst district and site level administrators of walkthroughs as a vehicle for system-wide school improvement. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3404728)
Google Scholar
Evans, L. M., Thornton, B., Usinger, J. (2010). Shared vision or collective assumptions? A study of educational leaders’ perceptions of walkthroughs. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 5(4). http://www.ncpeapublications.org/volume-5-number-4-july-september-2010/227-shared-vision-or-collective-assumptions-a-study-of-educational-leaders-perceptions-of-walkthroughs.html
Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (2008a). The six secrets of change: What the best leaders do to help their organizations survive and thrive. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
Google Scholar
Fullan, M. (2008b). What’s worth fighting for in the principalship (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press
Google Scholar
Gagliardi, P. (1986). The creation and change of organizational culture: A conceptual framework. Organization Studies, 7, 117-134.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1022-1054.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hamayan, E., Marler, B., Sanchez-Lopez, C., Damico, J. (2007). Special education considerations for English language learners: Delivering a continuum of services. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon.
Google Scholar
Hammond, S. A. (1998). The thin book of appreciative inquiry (2nd ed.). Bend, OR: Thin Book.
Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A., Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar
Kelemen, M. L. (2003). Managing quality: Managerial and critical perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Knowles, M. (1980). The modem practice of adult education: From pedagogy to andragogy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Marzano, R. J., Frontier, T., Livingston, D. (2011). Effective supervision: Supporting the art and science of teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Militello, M., Rallis, S. F., Goldring, E. B. (2009). Leading with inquiry and action: How principals improve teaching and learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar
Pallot, J. (1992). Elements of a theoretical framework for public sector accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(1), 38-50.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reeves, D. B. (2010). Transforming professional development into student results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Schrum, L., Levin, B. B. (2009). Leading 21st century schools: Harnessing technology for engagement and achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Google Scholar
Sparks, D. (1994). A paradigm shift in staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 15(4), 26-29.
Google Scholar
Spillane, J. P. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 141-179.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wellman, B., Lipton, L. (2004). Data-driven dialogue: A facilitator’s guide to collaborative inquiry. Sherman, CT: MiraVia.
Google Scholar
Whitney, D. (2004). Appreciative inquiry and the elevation of organizational consciousness. In Cooperrider, D. L., Avital, M. (Eds.), Advances in appreciative inquiry: Vol 1. Constructive discourse and human organization (pp. 125-145). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Google Scholar | Crossref
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

BUL-article-ppv for $36.00