![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
In recent years, policy changes in American education have refocused a spotlight on principal instructional leadership. Although in previous eras the professional literature exhorted principals to “be instructional leaders,” there were few sanctions if they failed to do so. In the current policy context, however, instructional leadership has assumed a central rather than peripheral place in the hierarchy of roles played by principals. Today principals who fail to engage this role proactively and skillfully do so at their own risk. Yet history suggests that neither policy mandates nor good intentions will penetrate the “force field” that stands between the principal and the tasks involved in leading learning. A more strategic and coherent approach is needed by principals who wish to enact this role in practice. This article reviews the evolution of instructional leadership as a model for principal practice, examines barriers to its successful enactment, and proposes strategies that school leaders can employ to reduce the gap between intentions and reality.
References
Section:
|
Barth, R. (1980). Run school run. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Barth, R. (1990). Improving schools from within. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar | |
|
Bell, L., Bolam, R., Cubillo, L. (2003). A systematic review of the impact of school headteachers and principals on student outcomes. London, England: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Bossert, S., Dwyer, D., Rowan, B., Lee, G. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34-64. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Bridges, E. (1967). Instructional leadership: A concept re-examined. Journal of Educational Administration, 5, 136-147. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bryk, A., Sebring, P., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., Easton, J. (2009). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Covey, S. R. (2004). The seven habits of highly effective people. New York, NY: Free Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Cuban, L. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Donaldson, G. (2006). Cultivating leadership in schools: Connecting people, purpose, & practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Dwyer, D. (1986). Understanding the principal’s contribution to instruction. Peabody Journal of Education, 63(1), 3-18. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15-24. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Fullan, M. (2006). The development of transformational leaders for educational decentralization. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Michael Fullan. Google Scholar | |
|
Goldring, E., Huff, J., May, H., Camburn, E. (2008). School context and individual characteristics: What influences principal practice? Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 332-352. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Grubb, N. W., Flessa, J. (2006). “A job too big for one”: Multiple principals and other nontraditional approaches to school leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 518-550. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Hall, G., Hord, S. (2002). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar | |
|
Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 125-142. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading Educational Change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329-351. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hallinger, P., Heck, R. H. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5-44. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Hallinger, P., Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9, 157-191. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hallinger, P., Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30, 95-110. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hallinger, P., Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86, 217-248. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hallinger, P., Murphy, J., Weil, M., Mesa, R. P., Mitman, A. (1983). Effective schools: Identifying the specific practices and behaviors of the principal, NASSP Bulletin, 67(463), 83-91. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Horng, E. L., Klasik, D., Loeb, S. (2010). Principal time-use and school effectiveness. Washington, DC: National Center for the Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. Google Scholar | |
|
Kotter, J. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Leithwood, K. (2001). School leadership in the context of accountability policies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 217-235. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28, 27-42. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. St. Paul: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement, University of Minnesota. Google Scholar | |
|
Lipham, J. (1961). Effective principal, effective school. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals. Google Scholar | |
|
Louis, K. S., Dretzkea, B., Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21, 315-336. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Marshall, K. (1996). How I confronted HSPS (hyperactive superficial principal syndrome) and began to deal with the heart of the matter. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 336-345. Google Scholar | |
|
Marshall, K. (2004). How I recovered from HSPS (hyperactive superficial principal syndrome): A progress report. Phi Delta Kappan, 84, 701-709. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Martin, W., Willower, D. J. (1981). The managerial behavior of high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17, 69-90. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Martinko, M. J., Gardner, W. L. (1990). Structured observation of managerial work: A replication and synthesis. Journal of Management Studies, 27, 329-357. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
May, H., Huff, J., Goldring, E. (2012). A longitudinal study of principals’ activities and student performance. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23, 417-439. doi:10.1080/09243453.2012.678866 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York, NY: Harper & Row. Google Scholar | |
|
Mulford, B., Silins, H. (2003). Leadership for organizational learning and improved student outcomes: What do we know? Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(2), 175-195. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Murphy, J. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Murphy, J. (2008). The place of leadership in turnaround schools: Insights from organizational recovery in the public and private sectors. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 74-98. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., Lotto, L., Miller, S. (1987). Barriers to implementing the instructional leadership role. The Canadian Administrator, 27(3), 1-9. Google Scholar | |
|
Nettles, S., Herrington, C. (2007). Revisiting the importance of the direct effects of school leadership on student achievement: The implications for school improvement policy. Peabody Journal of Education, 82, 724-736. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Porter, A., Murphy, J., Goldring, E., Elliott, S. N. (2008). Vanderbilt Assessment of Leadership in Education. Retrieved from http://www.valed.com Google Scholar | |
|
Robinson, V., Lloyd, C., Rowe, K. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635-674. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Schoen, L., Fusarelli, L. (2008). Innovation, NCLB, and the fear factor: The challenge of leading 21st-century schools in an era of accountability. Educational Policy, 22, 181-203. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Silva, J., White, G., Yoshida, R. (2011). The direct effects of principal–student discussions on eighth grade students’ gains in reading achievement: An experimental study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 772-793. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Southworth, G. (2002). Instructional leadership in schools: Reflections and empirical evidence. School Leadership & Management, 22, 73-92. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Spillane, J. P., Camburn, E. M., Pareja, A. (2007). Taking a distributed perspective to the school principal’s workday. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 6, 103-125. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Uhls, H. (1962). What’s important Mr. Principal? NASSP Bulletin, 46, 108-111. Google Scholar | |
|
Witziers, B., Bosker, R., Kruger, M. (2003). Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 398-425. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
