This article discusses a qualitative case study examining one middle school’s response to intervention (RtI) efforts. Study participants included the principal, assistant principal, and members of the school’s leadership team. A description of the RtI consensus and infrastructure-building processes, consideration of the RtI facilitators, and a review of the accomplishments and barriers to implementation they encountered are provided.

Alfassi, M. (1998). Reading for meaning: The efficacy of reciprocal teaching in fostering reading comprehension in high school students in remedial reading classes. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 309-331.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Biancarosa, G., Snow, C. E. (2004). Reading next–A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy: A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Google Scholar
Brown, J. L., Moffett, C. A. (1999). The hero’s journey: How educators can transform schools and improve learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Buffum, A., Mattos, M. (2009). Pyramid response to intervention: RTI, professional learning communities, and how to respond when kids don’t learn. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Google Scholar
Chalfant, J. C., Pysh, M. V. (1989). Teacher assistance teams: Five descriptive studies on 96 teams. Remedial and Special Education, 10(4), 49-58.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Christ, T. J., Hintze, J. M. (2007). Psychometric considerations when evaluating response to intervention. In Jimerson, S. R., Burns, M. K., VanDerHeyden, A. M. (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 93-105). New York, NY: Springer Science.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Council for Exceptional Children Policy Manual . (2008). Section 4, part 3, pp. 1-10.
Google Scholar
Craig, S., Hull, K., Haggart, A. G., Perez-Selles, M. (2000). Promoting cultural competence through teacher assistance teams. Teaching Exceptional Children, 32(3), 6-12.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R. (2008). Revisiting professional learning communities at work: New insights for improving schools. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Google Scholar
DuFour, R., Marzano, R. (2011). Leaders of learning: How district, school, and classroom leaders improve student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Google Scholar
Duffy, H. (2007). Meeting the needs of significantly struggling learners in high school: A look at approaches to tiered intervention. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, National High School Center.
Google Scholar
Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of Educational Research, 79, 262-300.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393-447.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Faggella-Luby, M., Wardwell, M. (2011). RTI in a middle school: Findings and practical implications of a tier 2 reading comprehension study. Learning Disability Quarterly, 34, 35-49.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Florida Department of Education . (2008). Statewide Response to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) Implementation Plan. Retrieved from http://www.fldoe.org/schools/rti.asp
Google Scholar
Foorman, B., Al Otaiba, S. (2009). Reading remediation: State of the art. In McCardle, P., Pugh, K. (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology, and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice (pp. 257-274). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Stecker, P. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Council for Exceptional Children, 76, 301-323.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. (2006). Implementing responsiveness-to-intervention to identify learning disabilities. Perspectives on Dyslexia, 32, 39-43.
Google Scholar
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. (2007). A model for implementing responsiveness to intervention. Teaching Exceptional Children, 39(5), 14-20.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Fullan, M. (2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Google Scholar
Glover, T. A. (2010). Supporting all students: The promise of response to intervention. In Glover, T. A., Vaughn, S. (Eds.), The promise of response to intervention: Evaluating current science and practice (pp. 143-186). New York, NY: Guilford.
Google Scholar
Hargreaves, A., Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and non-sustainability of decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 3-41.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Heller, R., Greenleaf, C. (2007). Literacy instruction in the content areas: Getting to the core of middle and high school improvement. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Google Scholar
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/pubs/change34/
Google Scholar
Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-466. Illinois State Response to Intervention Plan . (2008). Retrieved from http://www.isbe.state:il.us/pdf/rti_state_plan.pdf
Google Scholar
Johnson, E. S., Smith, L. (2008). Implementation of response to intervention at middle school. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(3), 46-52.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Kamil, M. L. (2003). Adolescents and literacy: Reading for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
Google Scholar
Katzenbach, J. R., Kahn, Z. (2010). Leading outside the lines: How to mobilize the (in) formal organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
King, S., Lemons, C. J., Hill, D. R. (2012). Response to intervention in secondary schools: Considerations for administrators. NASSP Bulletin, 96(1), 5-22.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Kovaleski, J. F. (2007). Response to intervention: Considerations for research and systems change. School Psychology Review, 36, 638-646.
Google Scholar | ISI
Kovaleski, J. F., Black, L. (2010). Multi-tier service delivery: Current status and future directions. In Glover, T. A., Vaughn, S. (Eds.), The promise of response to intervention: Evaluating current science and practice (pp. 23-56). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Lambert, L. (2003). Leadership capacity for lasting school improvement. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards-based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 34-62.
Google Scholar
Leslie, L., Caldwell, J. (2001). Qualitative Reading Inventory-3. New York, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
Google Scholar
Marshall, C., Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
McCardle, P., Chhabra, V. (2004). The voice of evidence in reading research. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Google Scholar
McCook, J. E. (2006). The RtI guide: Developing and implementing a model in your schools. Arlington, VA: LRP.
Google Scholar
Mellard, D. F., Johnson, E. (2008). RtI: A practitioner’s guide to implementing response to intervention. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
National Association of State Directors of Special Education . (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Author.
Google Scholar
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development . (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Google Scholar
No Child Left Behind Act . (2001). Public Law 107-15.
Google Scholar
Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services . (2002, November 5). 20 U.S.C. 9501 et seq., the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, Title I of Public Law 107-279.
Google Scholar
O’Doherty, A., Ovando, M. N. (2009). Drivers of success: One district’s process for closing achievement gaps in a post-no child left behind context. Journal of School Leadership, 19, 6-32.
Google Scholar
Pereles, D. A., Omdal, S., Baldwin, L. (2009). Response to intervention and twice exceptional learners: A promising fit. Gifted Child Today, 32(3), 40-51.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Powers, K. (2001). Problem solving student support teams. The California School Psychologist, 6, 1930.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reed, D., Vaughn, S. (2010). Reading interventions for older students. In Glover, T. A., Vaughn, S. (Eds.), The promise of response to intervention: Evaluating current science and practice (pp. 143-186). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31-73.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Reading rewards . (2008). Retrieved from http://store.cambiumlearning.com
Google Scholar
Reading horizons . (2009). Retrieved from http://www.readinghorizons.com
Google Scholar
Sansosti, F. J., Noltemeyer, A., Goss, S. (2010). Principals’ perceptions of the importance and availability of response to intervention practices within high school settings. School Psychology Review, 39, 286-295.
Google Scholar | ISI
Sharratt, L., Fullan, M. (2009). Realization: The change imperative for deepening district-wide reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., Burns, M.S., Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Google Scholar
Strauss, A. L., Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Strauss, A. L., Corbin, J. M. (1998). Description, conceptual ordering, and theorizing. In Strauss, A. L., Corbin, J. M. (Eds.), Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed., pp. 15-25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7, 935-947.
Google Scholar
Sugai, G., Horner, R., Fixsen, D., Blase, K. (2010). Developing systems-level capacity for RTI implementation: Current efforts and future directions. In Glover, T. A., Vaughn, S. (Eds.), The promise of response to intervention: Evaluating current science and practice (pp. 143-186). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Tilly, W. D. (2006). Response to intervention: An overview. What is it? Why do it? Is it worth it? The Special Edge, 19(2), 1-5.
Google Scholar
Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57, 12-16.
Google Scholar | ISI
Tomlinson, C. A., Kalbfleisch, M. I. (1998, November). Teach me, teach my brain: A call for differentiated classrooms. Educational Leadership, 56(3), 52-55.
Google Scholar | ISI
Torgesen, J. K. (2007). Catch them before they fall: Early identification and intervention to prevent reading failure for young children. Paper presented to educators and parents in Durango, CO.
Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education . (2001). No Child Left Behind. Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
Vaughn, S., Fletcher, J. M. (2010). Thoughts on rethinking RTI with secondary students. School Psychology Review, 39, 296-299.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Vaughn, S., Fuchs, L. S. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 137-146.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Vaughn, S., Wanzek, J., Fletcher, J. M. (2007). Multiple tiers of intervention: A framework for prevention and identification of students with reading/learning disabilities. In Taylor, B. M., Ysseldyke, J. (Eds.), Educational interventions for struggling readers (pp. 173-196). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Wiener, R. M., Soodak, L. C. (2008). Special education administrators’ perspectives on response to intervention. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 21, 39-45.
Google Scholar
Yovanoff, P., Duesbery, L., Alonzo, J., Tindal, G. (2005). Grade-level invariance of a theoretical causal structure predicting reading comprehension with vocabulary and oral reading fluency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 24, 4-12.
Google Scholar | Crossref

Bio

Shannon K. Dulaney, EdD, is an assistant professor in the Educational Leadership and Foundations Department at Brigham Young University (BYU). Before joining the BYU faculty 2 years ago, she served as a classroom teacher in California and as a classroom teacher, secondary school principal, and district special programs director in Utah.

View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

BUL-article-ppv for $36.00