Teachers crave yet rarely receive qualitative performance feedback. Though student feedback has been studied, we know little about what kinds of feedback are useful to teachers for improving practice. This study begins to address the need in research on the nature of feedback teachers receive from classroom observations as well as on how teachers make sense of feedback. Written feedback to four teachers was analyzed using Feedback Intervention Theory. Teacher perceptions from “think-aloud” of feedback were also analyzed qualitatively.

Accomplished California Teachers . (2010). A quality teacher in every classroom: Creating a teacher evaluation system that works for California. Stanford, CA: National Board Resource Center, Stanford University.
Google Scholar
Atteberry, A., Bryk, A., Walker, L., Biancarosa, G. (2008). Variations in the amount of coaching in literacy collaborative schools. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
Google Scholar
Baker, E. L., Barton, P. E., Darling-Hammond, L., Haertel, E., Ladd, H. F., Linn, R. L., . . . Shepard, L. A. (2010, August 27). Problems with the use of student test scores to evaluate teachers (Economic Policy Institute Briefing Paper #278). http://www.epi.org/publication/bp278/
Google Scholar
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Blase, J., Blase, J. (2004). Handbook of instructional leadership: How successful principals promote teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar
Blumberg, A. (1985). Where we came from: Notes on supervision in the 1840s. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 1(1), 56-65.
Google Scholar
Boyd, D., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 416-440.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Branch, G., Hanushek, E. A., Rivkin, S. G. (2009). Estimating principal effectiveness (CALDER Working Paper 32). Washington, DC: CALDER.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brewer, D. J. (1993). Principals and student outcomes: Evidence from U.S. high schools. Economics of Education Review, 12, 281-292.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brinko, K. T. (1993). The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching: What is effective? Journal of Higher Education, 64, 574-593.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97, 19-35.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Charmaz, K. (2001). Grounded theory. In Emerson, R. M. (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 335-352). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
Google Scholar
Cogan, M. (1973). Clinical supervision. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Cuban, L. (1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Google Scholar
Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Google Scholar
Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Eberts, R. W., Stone, J. A. (1988). Student achievement in public schools: Do principals make a difference? Economics of Education Review, 7, 291-299.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ericsson, K. A., Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Frase, L. E., Streshly, W. (1994). Lack of accuracy, feedback, and commitment in teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8(1), 4757.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Glazerman, S., Loeb, S., Goldhaber, D., Staiger, D. O., Raudenbush, S., Whitehurst, G. (2010). Evaluating teachers: The important role of value-added (Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Google Scholar
Glickman, C. D. (1990). Supervision of instruction: A developmental approach (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Google Scholar
Goldhammer, R. (1969). Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Google Scholar
Grissom, J., Loeb, S., Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 42, 433-444.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Grossman, P. L. (2012). Description of thirteen elements. Retrieved from http://platorubric.stanford.edu/Elements.html
Google Scholar
Grossman, P., Loeb, S., Cohen, J., Wyckoff, J. (2013). Measure for measure: The relationship between measures of instructional practice in middle school English language arts and teachers’ value-added scores. American Journal of Education, 119, 445-470.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96, 527-549.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hallinger, P., Heck, R. (1996). Reassessing the principal’s role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 5-44.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Harlen, W. (2007). Holding up a mirror to classroom practice. Primary Science Review, 100, 29-31.
Google Scholar
Hattie, J., Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81-112.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hill, H. C., Blunk, M., Charalambous, C., Lewis, J., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., Ball, D. L. (2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 430-511.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Horng, E., Kalogrides, D., Loeb, S. (2009). Principal preferences and the unequal distribution of principals across schools (CALDER Working Paper No. 36). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
Google Scholar
Hunter, M. C. (1982). Mastery teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Google Scholar
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(4), 349371.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kanfer, R., Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657-690.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kinicki, A. J., Prussia, G. E., Wu, B. J., McKee-Ryan, F. M. (2004). A covariance structure analysis of employees’ response to performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 10571069.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Kluger, A. N., DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A Historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kluger, A. N., DeNisi, A. S. (1998). Feedback interventions: Towards the understanding of a double-edged sword. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(3), 67-72.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Koestner, R., Zuckerman, M., Koestner, J. (1987). Praise, involvement, and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 383-390.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Leithwood, K. A., Duke, D. L. (1999). A century’s quest to understand school leadership. In Louis, K. S., Murphy, J. (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 45-72). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Leithwood, K. A., Louis, K. S. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Leithwood, K. A., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning: Review of research. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.
Google Scholar
Loeb, S. (2013). How can value-added measures be used for teacher improvement? Retrieved from http://www.carnegieknowledgenetwork.org/briefs/teacher_improvement/
Google Scholar
Loeb, S., Darling-Hammond, L., Luczak, J. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(3), 44-70
Google Scholar | Crossref
Margolis, J. (2012). Hybrid teacher leaders and the new professional development ecology. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 291315.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mason, B. J., Bruning, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Retrieved from http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html
Google Scholar
Matsumura, L. C., Garnier, H. E., Spybrook, J. (2012). The effect of content-focused coaching on the quality of classroom text discussions. Journal of Teacher Education, 63, 214-228.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
McCollum, J. A., Hemmeter, M. L., Hsieh, W.Y. (2011). Coaching teachers for emergent literacy instruction using performance-based feedback. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(10), 1-10.
Google Scholar
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Narciss, S., Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multi-media learning. In Niegemann, H. M., Leutner, D., Brunken, R. (Eds.), Instructional design for multimedia learning (pp. 181-195). Munster, NY: Waxmann.
Google Scholar
Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237-257.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
OECD . (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf
Google Scholar
Prestine, N. A., Nelson, B. S. (2005). How can educational leaders support and promote teaching and learning? New conceptions of learning and leading in schools. In Firestone, W. A., Riehl, C. (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 46-60). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Purkey, S., Smith, M. (1983). Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal, 83, 427-453.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417-458.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ross, J. A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effects of coaching on student achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 17(1), 51-65.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Scheeler, M. C., Ruhl, K. L., McAfee, J. K. (2004). Providing performance feedback to teachers: A review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 396-407.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Shulman, L. S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In Shulman, L. S., Sykes, G. (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 484-504). New York, NY: Longman.
Google Scholar
Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153-189.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Stein, M. K., Spillane, J. (2005). What can researchers on educational leadership learn from research on teaching? Building a bridge. In Firestone, W. A., Riehl, C. (Eds.), A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 28-45). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Strauss, A. L., Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management (Reprinted 1967). New York, NY: Norton.
Google Scholar
Toch, T., Rothman, R. (2008). Rush to judgment: Teacher evaluation in public education. Washington, DC: Education Sector.
Google Scholar
Tuytens, M., Devos, G. (2012). Importance of system and leadership in performance appraisal. Personnel Review, 41(6), 756776.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tracy, S. J. (1995). How historical concepts of supervision relate to supervisory practices today. Clearing House, 68, 320-324.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about effects of leadership on student achievement (Working Paper). Aurora, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.
Google Scholar
Weisberg, D., Sexton, S., Mulhern, J., Keeling, D. (2009). The widget effect: Our national failure to acknowledge and act on differences in teacher effectiveness. Brooklyn, NY: New Teacher Project. Retrieved from http://widgeteffect.org/
Google Scholar
Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: Free Press.
Google Scholar
WestEd . (2004). California professional standards for educational leaders. Retrieved from http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/cpsel_standards.pdf
Google Scholar
White, B. R., Bowers, A. J. (2011). Principal effects in Illinois: A research brief (IERC 2011-3). Edwardsville: Illinois Education Research Council.
Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

BUL-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles