This article utilizes mixed methods—a lottery-based experimental design supplemented by qualitative data—to examine college readiness within an innovative high school setting: early college high schools. Early colleges are small schools that merge the high school and college experiences and are targeted at students underrepresented in college. Results show that early college students are more likely to have successfully completed the courses they need for entrance into college; early college students also graduated from high school at a higher rate. Interview and survey data show that early college students are generally considered similarly prepared to more traditional postsecondary students. The interview data also provide detailed descriptions of the kinds of strategies the schools use to support college readiness. The article concludes with lessons learned for secondary school principals.

Achieve . (2004). Ready or not? Creating a high school diploma that counts. Retrieved from https://www.achieve.org/files/ReadyorNot.pdf
Google Scholar
Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Google Scholar
Adelman, C., Daniel, B., Berkovits, I. (2003). Postsecondary attainment, attendance, curriculum, and performance: Selected results from the NELS:88/2000 Postsecondary Education Transcript Study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Google Scholar
Allen, D., Dadgar, M. (2012). Does dual enrollment increase students’ success in college? Evidence from a quasi-experimental analysis of dual enrollment in New York City. New Directions for Higher Education, 158, 11-19.
Google Scholar | Crossref
An, B. P. (2013). The impact of dual enrollment on college degree attainment: Do low-SES students benefit? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35, 57-75.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
An, B. P., Taylor, J. L. (2015). Are dual enrollment students college ready? Evidence from the Wabash National Study of Liberal Arts Education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(58), 1-26.
Google Scholar
Arshavsky, N., Lewis, K. C., Thrift, B., Edmunds, J. A. (2016, April). A perspective on college readiness from schools where most students take college courses. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
Balfanz, R., McPartland, J., Shaw, A. (2002). Reconceptualizing extra help for high school students in a high standards era. Baltimore, MD: Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.
Google Scholar
Bettinger, E. B., Long, B. T., Oreopoulos, P., Sanbonmatsu, L. (2009). The role of simplification and information in college decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA experiment. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Google Scholar
Bozick, R., DeLuca, S. (2011). Not making the transition to college: School, work and opportunities in the lives of American youth. Social Science Research, 40, 1249-1262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Carnevale, A. P., Smith, N., Strohl, J. (2010). Help wanted: Projections of jobs and education requirements through 2018. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce.
Google Scholar
Castleman, B. L., Owen, L., Page, L. C. (2015). Stay late or start early? Experimental evidence on the benefits of college matriculation support from high school versus colleges. Economics of Education Review, 47, 168-179.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Conley, D. T. (2005). College knowledge: What it really takes for students to succeed and what we can do to get them ready. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Conley, D. T. (2008). Rethinking college readiness. New Directions for Higher Education, 144, 3-13.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Conley, D. T. (2011). Redefining college readiness. Eugene, OR: Educational Policy Improvement Center.
Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori, Teddlie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209-240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Edmunds, J. A. (2012). Early colleges: Redesigning high schools for college readiness. New Directions for Higher Education, 158, 81-90.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Edmunds, J. A., McColskey, W. (2007). Levers for change: Southeast region state initiatives to improve high schools (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007–No. 024). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.
Google Scholar
Edmunds, J. A., Unlu, F., Glennie, E., Bernstein, L., Fesler, L., Furey, J., Nina, A. (2017). Smoothing the transition to postsecondary education: The impact of the early college model. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10, 297-325.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Edmunds, J. A., Unlu, F., Glennie, E., Furey, J., Henson, R., Naumenko, O., Hutchins, B. C., Sheffield, L., Grebing, E. (2016, April). Moving from the “boutique” to the “broad”: Scaling up early college efforts in different settings. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
Finkelstein, N. D., Fong, A. B. (2008). Course-taking patterns and preparation for postsecondary education in California’s public university systems among minority youth (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2008–No. 035). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory West.
Google Scholar
Hooker, S. (2017). Leadership lessons from the Early College Expansion Partnership. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.
Google Scholar
Iatarola, P., Conger, D., Long, M. C. (2011). Determinants of high schools’ advanced course offerings. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 340-359.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Institute of Education Sciences . (2005). Key items to get right when conducting a randomized controlled trial in education. Retrieved from http://coalition4evidence.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Guide-Key-items-to-Get-Right-RCT.pdf
Google Scholar
Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., Torgeson, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Google Scholar
Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B. (1999). Social support and achievement for young adolescents in Chicago: The role of school academic press. American Educational Research Journal, 36, 907-945.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
North Carolina New Schools . (2013). North Carolina New Schools design principles. Retrieved from https://www.duplinschools.net/site/handlers/filedownload.ashx?moduleinstanceid=3899&dataid=16409&FileName=DesignPrinciples_August2013.pdf
Google Scholar
Roderick, M., Nagaoka, J., Coca, V., Moeller, E. (2008). From high school to the future: Potholes on the road to college. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
Google Scholar
Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Groff, C., Lake, C. (2008). Effective reading programs for middle and high schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 290-322.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Speroni, C. (2011). Determinants of students’ success: The role of advanced placement and dual enrollment programs. New York, NY: National Center for Postsecondary Research.
Google Scholar
Swanson, M. C., Mehan, H., Hubbard, L. (1995). The AVID classroom: Academic and social support for low-achieving students. In J. Oakes, Quartz, H. (Eds.), Creating new educational communities, Part I (94th Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, pp. 53-69). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Tierney, W. G., Bailey, T., Constantine, J., Finkelstein, N., Hurd, N. F. (2009). Helping students navigate the path to college: What high schools can do: A practice guide (NCEE #2009-4066). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Google Scholar
Vargas, J. (2014). Sharing responsibility for college success: A model partnership moves students to diplomas and degrees. Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.
Google Scholar

Author Biographies

Julie A. Edmunds is program director for Secondary School Reform at the SERVE Center at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro where she has been studying early colleges for over ten years. She also conducts evaluations of various interventions at the high school and postsecondary levels.

Nina Arshavsky is a senior research specialist at the SERVE Center. Her work has spanned from mathematics education to high school reform, including curriculum development and teacher professional development in mathematics content and pedagogy. She also conducts research on the early college high school reform model and STEM education.

Karla Lewis is a project director at the SERVE Center where she provides technical assistance and conducts research on school improvement efforts. She is also the director of evaluation services for the Non-profit Evaluation Support Program.

Beth Thrift is a program specialist at the SERVE Center where she has contributed to a range of research, development, and dissemination projects. She has content expertise in a variety of areas including evaluation capacity building, migrant education, differentiating instruction, technology in learning, and adult learning.

Fatih Unlu, PhD, is a senior economist at the RAND Corporation. His research covers a wide variety of education topics with a focus on higher education, teacher and principal effectiveness, and quantitative research methods.

Jane Furey is a programmer analyst at Abt Associates where she contributes to educational studies using advanced statistical techniques.

View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

BUL-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0