Abstract
This study is to investigate the effectiveness of using mobile devices such as iPhone/iPad/android phone/tablet to facilitate mobile learning in aural skills. The application Auralbook was designed in 2011 by an engineer/musician to use mobile devices to learn aural skills. This application enables students to sing, record, clap and answer questions generated by the computer based on the Associated Board of Royal Schools of Music (ABRSM) syllabus for more than 100,000 users worldwide. This study is to a) examine the effectiveness of using application Auralbook to learn aural skills, b) observe the progress of learning during the aural musicianship development, and c) propose a theoretical framework in using mobile devices to learn aural skills. The performance scores in each area, such as clapping, singing, feature (stylistic recognition), are analyzed. Research findings indicate that the functions clapping and singing score better than the other function – feature (stylistic recognition). The frequent users show significant progress in clapping and feature (stylistic recognition) at the beginner level, and singing at the intermediate level in this study.
|
Beckman, A. (2011). Aural skills pedagogy: From academic research to everyday classroom. San Marcos: Texas State University. Google Scholar | |
|
Brophy, J. (1998). Motivating students to learn. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar | |
|
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row. Google Scholar | |
|
Hallam, S. (2006). Musicality. In McPherson, G. (Ed.), The child as musician: A handbook of musical development (pp. 93–110). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A., Haywood, K. (2011). The 2011 horizon report. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium. Google Scholar | |
|
Kress, G., Pachler, N. (2007) Thinking about the “m” in m-learning. In Pachler, N. (Ed.), Mobile learning: Towards a research agenda. (pp. 7–32). London, UK: Institute of Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Leong, S. (2011). Navigating the emerging futures in music education. Journal of Music, Technology and Education, 4(2 & 3), 233–244. Google Scholar | |
|
Kennedy, M., Kennedy, J. (2007). The concise Oxford dictionary of music (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Pachler, N. (2010). Charting the conceptual space. In Pachler, N., Bachmair, B., Cook, J. (Eds.), Mobile learning: Structures, agency, practices. (pp. 3–26). New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Renwick, J., Reeve, J. (2012). Supporting motivation in music education. In McPherson, G., Welch, G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of music education (pp. 143–162). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sharples, M. (2009). Methods for evaluating mobile learning. In Lang, P. (Ed.), Researching mobile learning: Frameworks, tools and research designs (pp. 17–40). Bern, Switzerland: International Academic Publishers. Google Scholar | |
|
Sole, C. (2009). The fleeting, the situated and the mundane: Ethnographic approaches to mobile language learning (MALL). In Lang, P. (Ed.), Researching mobile learning: Frameworks, tools and research designs (pp. 137–150). Bern, Switzerland: International Academic Publishers. Google Scholar | |
|
Welch, G. (2005). We are musical. International Journal of Music Education, 23(2), 117–120. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |

