The purpose of this study was to test a hypothesized model of solo music performance assessment. Specifically, this study investigates the influence of technique and musical expression on perceptions of overall performance quality. The Aural Musical Performance Quality (AMPQ) measure was created to measure overall performance quality, technique, musical expression, tone, intonation, rhythmic accuracy, articulation, tempo, dynamics, tone character, and interpretation. The factors of interest were identified from previous studies on musical performance constructs, musical achievement, musical expression, and scale construction. Alpha reliability for the 44-item Likert scale AMPQ measure was reported at .977. Volunteer adjudicators (N = 58) were recruited to evaluate four solo instrumental recordings (brass, woodwind, voice, and string). A path analysis of the 232 performance evaluations provided empirical support for the hypothesized model. Technique demonstrated significant direct effects on assessments of overall performance quality and musical expression. Musical expression also demonstrated a significant direct effect on overall perceptions of performance quality. The results of this study are consistent with hypothesized model of performer-controlled musical factors.

Abeles, H. F. (1971). An application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the development of a rating scale for clarinet music performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
Google Scholar
Asmus, E. P. (1980). Empirical testing of an affective learning paradigm. Journal of Research in Music Education, 28(3), 143154.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Asmus, E. P. (1981). Higher order factors of a multidimensional instrument for the measurement of musical affect. Paper presented at the Research Symposium on the Psychology and Acoustics of Music, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
Google Scholar
Bergee, M. J. (1987). An application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the development of a rating scale for euphonium and tuba music performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49 (05), 1086A.
Google Scholar
Bergee, M. J. (1993). A comparison of faculty, peer, and self-evaluation of applied brass jury performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41, 1927.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bergee, M. J. (1995). Primary and higher-order factors in a scale assessing concert band performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 126, 114.
Google Scholar
Bergee, M. J. (1997). Relationships among faculty, peer, and self-evaluations of applied music performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45, 601612.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bergee, M. J. (2003). Faculty interjudge reliability of music performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54, 244256.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bergee, M. J. (2006). External and internal validation of a model explaining variability in solo and small-ensemble festival adjudication. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51, 137150.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Burnsed, V., Hinkle, B., King, S. (1985). Performance evaluation reliability at selected concert festivals. Journal of Band Research, 21(1), 2229.
Google Scholar | ISI
Colwell, R. (1963). An investigation of musical achievement among vocal students, vocal-instrumental students, and instrumental students. Journal of Research in Music Education, 11, 123130.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Fiske, H. E. (1975). Judge-group differences in the rating of secondary school trumpet performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 23, 186196.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Fiske, H. E. (1977). Relationship of selected factors in performance adjudication reliability. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25, 256263.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gabrielsson, A. (1999). Studying emotional expression in musical performance. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 141, 4753.
Google Scholar
Geringer, J. M., Johnson, C. M. (2007). Effects of duration, tempo, and performance level on musicians’ ratings of wind band performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 289301.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Geringer, J. M., Madsen, C. (1998). Musician’s ratings of good versus bad vocal and string performances. Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 522534.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hevner, K. (1938). Studies in expressiveness of music. Music Teachers National Association Proceedings, 39, 199217.
Google Scholar
Hewitt, M. P. (2007). Influence of primary performance instrument and education level on music performance evaluation. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 1830.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hodges, D. A. (1975). The effects of recorded aural models on the performance achievement of beginning band classes. Journal of Band Research, 12(1), 3034.
Google Scholar | ISI
Hoffren, J. A. (1964). A test of musical expression. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 2, 3235.
Google Scholar
Johnson, C. M., Geringer, J. M. (2007). Predicting music majors’ overall ratings of wind band performances: Elements of music. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 173, 2538.
Google Scholar
Jones, H. (1986). An application of the facet-factorial approach to scale construction in the development of a rating scale for high school vocal solo performance. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 1230A.
Google Scholar
Juslin, P. N. (1997). Can results from studies of perceived expression in music performances be generalized across response formats? Psychomusicology, 16, 77101.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Juslin, P. N., Laukka, P. (2004). Expression, perception, and induction of musical emotions: A review and a questionnaire study of everyday listening (Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference, 2003). Journal of New Music Research, 33, 217238.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Juslin, P. N., Lindstrom, E. (2003). Musical expression of emotions: Modeling composed and performed features. Paper presented at the 5th Triennial ESCOM Conference at Hanover University of Music and Drama, Germany.
Google Scholar
Keith, T. Z. (2006). Multiple regression and beyond. Boston: Pearson Education.
Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Kopiez, R., Lee, J. I. (2008). Toward a general model of skills involved in sight reading music. Music Education Research, 10, 4162.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
LeBlanc, A. (1980). Outline of a proposed model of sources of variation in musical taste. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 61, 2934.
Google Scholar
Levi, D. S. (1978). Expressive qualities in music perception and music education. Journal of Research in Music Education, 26, 425435.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Lippitt, G. L. (1973). Visualizing change: Model building and the change process. La Jolla, CA: University Associates.
Google Scholar
Madsen, C. K., Geringer, J. M. (2008). Reflections on Puccini’s La Bohème: Investigating a model for listening. Journal of Research in Music Education, 56, 3342.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
McPherson, G. E., Thompson, W. F. (1998). Assessing music performance: Issues and influences. Research Studies in Music Education, 10, 1224.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Miksza, P. (2007). An investigation of observed practice behaviors, self-reported practice habits, and the performance achievement of high school wind players. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55, 359375.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mills, J. (1987). Assessment of solo musical performance—a preliminary study. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 91, 119125.
Google Scholar
Neilson, J. (1973). A blueprint for adjudicators. The Instrumentalist, 28(5), 4648.
Google Scholar
Owen, C. D. (1969). A study of criteria for the evaluation of secondary school instrumentalists when auditioning for festival bands. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, East Texas State University, 1969.
Google Scholar
Russell, B. E. (2010). The development of a guitar performance rating scale using a facet-factorial approach. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 184, 2134.
Google Scholar
Sagen, D. P. (1983). The development and validation of a university band performance rating scale. Journal of Band Research 18(2), 111.
Google Scholar | ISI
Stecklein, J. E., Aliferis, J. (1957). The relationship of instrument to music achievement scores. Journal of Research in Music Education, 5, 315.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Suchor, V. (1977). The influence of personality composition in applied piano groups. Journal of Research in Music Education, 25(3), 171183.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Thompson, W., Diamond, C. T. P., Balkwill, L. (1998). The adjudication of six performances of a Chopin etude: A study of expert knowledge. Psychology of Music, 26, 154175.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Thompson, S., Williamon, A. (2003). Evaluating evaluation: Musical performance assessment as a research tool. Music Perception, 21, 2141.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Van Gigch, J. P. (1991). System design modeling and metamodeling. New York: Plenum Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wrigley, W. J. (2005). Improving music performance assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.
Google Scholar
Zdzinski, S. F. (1993). Relationships among parental involvement, selected student attributes, and learning outcomes in instrumental music. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
Google Scholar
Zdzinski, S. F., Barnes, G. V. (2002). Development and validation of a string performance rating scale. Journal of Research in Music Education, 50, 245255.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

IJM-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles