Abstract
This study explores learners’ perspectives on the prevalent pedagogy being followed in an institutionalized setup in teaching Hindustani music; their preferences for learning (one to one, one to many, etc.) and the importance of riāz to them; the dynamics of teacher–student relationship; and the factors contributing to their creative music making. One hundred music students (from four music institutions) receiving training in Hindustani music at different academic career levels in an institutionalized setup, completed a survey on the above-mentioned themes. Students reported that teachers across all the institutions generally followed the prescribed syllabus but that some of them tried to manage the syllabus as per the students’ potential. At higher levels of training, findings indicated that teachers started giving training in their own style or in their guru’s style. During the initial years of training, according to the students, teachers emphasized imitation. Results show that over the years, students developed preferences in terms of mode of music learning and method of music practice. As they progressed through training, students became more open to teachers’ critical evaluations and comments. Despite the fact that institutions do follow a rigid curriculum for music education, which is contrary to guru–shishya tradition, it appeared that institutionalized music training is not exclusively a typical learning system.
|
Alter, A. B. (1999). Institutional music education: Northern area. In Arnold, A. (Ed.), The Garland encyclopedia of world music (pp. 442–448). New York: Garland Publishing. Google Scholar | |
|
Atre, P. (2000). Enlightening the listener: Contemporary North Indian classical vocal music performance. New Delhi, India: M. M. Publishers. Google Scholar | |
|
Bakhle, J. (2005). Two men and music: Nationalism in the making of an Indian classical tradition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bandopadhyay, S. (1977/1995). The origin of rāga. New Delhi, India: M. M. Publishers. Google Scholar | |
|
Bhat, J. T. (2009). Hindustani vocal music: As seen outside India. New Delhi, India: Abhinav Publications. Google Scholar | |
|
Chakravarti, H. (1991). Introduction to Indian music. Retrieved from http://www.indianmelody.com/musicintro1.htm Google Scholar | |
|
Choudhuri, I. N. (2015). Guru Shishya Parampara. Retrieved from http://www.indranathchoudhuri.com/Articles%20new%20new/Guru%20Shisya%20Parampara.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Craft, A. (2001). An analysis of research and literature on creativity in education (Report prepared for the Qualifications and Curriculum Authority). Retrieved from: http://www.ncaction.org.uk/creativity/creativity_report.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Crow, B. (2008). Changing conceptions of educational creativity: A study of student teachers’ experience of musical creativity. Music Education Research, 10(3), 373–388. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gaunt, H. (2011). Understanding the one-to-one relationship in instrumental/vocal tuition in higher education: Comparing student and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Music Education, 28(2), 159–179. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Golding, C. (2011). The many faces of constructivist discussion. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(5), 467–483. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Kippen, J. (1988). The Tabla of Lucknow: A cultural analysis of a musical tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Leung, W., Wong, P. W. Y. (2005). Matching music teacher’s self conception with students’ perception on teaching effectiveness in an unfavourable secondary classroom context. Revista Electrὀnica Complutense de Investigacion and Educatiὀn Musical, 2(1) (English version). Retrieved from http://pendientedemigracion.ucm.es/info/reciem/v2n1_english.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
McPhail, G. (2010). Crossing boundaries: Sharing concepts of music teaching from classroom to studio. Music Education Research, 12(1), 33–45. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Meer, W. V. D. (1980). Hindustani music in the 20th century. The Hague, Netherlands: M. N. Publishers. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Menon, R. R. (1973). Discovering Indian music. Bombay, India: Somaiya Publications. Google Scholar | |
|
Morgan, C., Morris, G. (1999). Good teaching and learning: Pupils and teachers speak. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Nayar, S. (1989). Bhatkhande’s contribution to music: A historical perspective. Bombay, India: Popular Prakashan. Google Scholar | |
|
Neuman, D. M. (1980). The life of music in North India: The organization of an artistic tradition. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Odena, O. (2012). Musical creativity: Insights from music education research. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate. Google Scholar | |
|
Oppenheim, M. H. (2012). Cross-cultural pedagogy in North Indian classical music (Unpublished thesis). University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Google Scholar | |
|
Raina, M. K. (2002). Guru–Shishya relationship in Indian culture: The possibility of a creative resilient framework. Psychology and Developing Societies, 14(1), 167–198. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Raja, D. S. (2005). Hindustani music: A tradition in transition. New Delhi, India: D. K. Printworld. Google Scholar | |
|
Simms, R. (1994). Some thoughts on the meaning of Riaz in Hindustani music. Bansuri, 11, 6–14. Google Scholar | |
|
Singh, N. (2004). Tradition of Hindustani music: A sociological approach. New Delhi, India: Kanishka Publishers. Google Scholar | |
|
Slawek, S. (1999). The classical master–disciple tradition. In Arnold, A. (Ed.), The Garland encyclopedia of world music (pp. 457–467). New York: Garland Publishing. Google Scholar | |
|
Upadhyay, D. K., Dalal, A. K. (2013). Growing up as a creative musician: The role of psychosocial dispositions and environment. Psychological Studies, 58(4), 427–436. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Vaidyanathan, T. G. (1989). Authority and identity in India. Daedalus, 118(4), 147–169. Google Scholar | ISI |

