Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content

Abstract

Perceived partner responsiveness is the extent to which one feels understood, validated, and cared for by their intimate partner. This is a centrally important construct in relationship science, with a robust literature indicating that individuals who perceive higher levels of responsiveness from their partner experiencing better relationship outcomes. Despite the large role that this construct plays in relationship science and our understanding of healthy relationship functioning, there is no measure adapted to Spanish language and culture. This study presents the 16-item and 8-item versions of the recently developed and psychometrically improved Perceived Responsiveness and Insensitivity Scale (PRIS; Crasta et al., 2021) that has been adapted to Spanish. Using a sample of 493 Spanish individuals, results demonstrate that this adapted scale exhibits adequate reliability, maintains the same internal structure as the original English version, demonstrates gender invariance, and presents adequate validity evidence when is associated to other variables. Adding the Spanish Adaptation of the PRIS (PRIS-SA) to the methodological toolkit of relationship scientists will allow this important construct to be examined in a cross-cultural fashion and among a diverse array of couples.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Algoe S. B., Zhaoyang R. (2016). Positive psychology in context: Effects of expressing gratitude in ongoing relationships depend on perceptions of enactor responsiveness. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(4), 399–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1117131
Alonso-Ferres M., Righetti F., Valor-Segura I., Expósito F. (2021). How power affects emotional communication during relationship conflicts: The role of perceived partner responsiveness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(7), 1203–1215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621996496
Aron A., Aron E. N., Smollan D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
Cheung G. W., Rensvold R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
Choi H., Oishi S. (2023). Cultural variations in perceived partner responsiveness: The role of self-consistency. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 54(2), 303–318. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220221221132786
Crasta D., Rogge R. D., Maniaci M. R., Reis H. T. (2021). Toward an optimized measure of perceived partner responsiveness: Development and validation of the perceived responsiveness and insensitivity scale. Psychological Assessment, 33(4), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000986
Finkel E. J., Simpson J. A., Eastwick P. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044038
Flanagan D. P., Harrison P. L. (Eds.). (2012). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
Gadassi R., Bar-Nahum L. E., Newhouse S., Anderson R., Heiman J. R., Rafaeli E., Janssen E. (2016). Perceived partner responsiveness mediates the association between sexual and marital satisfaction: A daily diary study in newlywed couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-014-0448-2
Gunaydin G., Selcuk E., Urganci B., Yalcintas S. (2021). Today you care, tomorrow you don’t: Differential roles of responsiveness variability and average responsiveness in romantic attachment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 839–849. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620944111
Guzmán-González M., Rivera-Ottenberger D., Brassard A., Spencer R., Lafontaine M.-F. (2020). Measuring adult romantic attachment: Psychometric properties of the brief Spanish version of the experiences in close relationships. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 33(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-020-00145-w
Hambleton R. K., de Jong J. H. A. L. (2003). Advances in translating and adapting educational and psychological tests. Language Testing, 20(2), 127–134. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt247xx
Harkness J. A. (2003). Questionnaire translation. In Harkness J. A., van de Vijver F. J. R., Mohler P. P. (Eds.), Cross-cultural survey methods (pp. 35–56). J. Wiley & Sons.
Hendershot Q. E. (2022). ‘El Grado de Felicidad’ o ‘cuan Feliz Se Encuentra’: Improving Spanish translations of relationship measures. Binghamton University.
Laurenceau J.-P., Barrett L. F., Rovine M. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.314
Maisel N. C., Gable S. L. (2009). The paradox of received social support: The importance of responsiveness. Psychological Science, 20(8), 928–932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02388.x
Pansera C., La Guardia J. (2012). The role of sincere amends and perceived partner responsiveness in forgiveness. Personal Relationships, 19(4), 696–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01386.x
Reis H. T. (2012). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing theme for the study of relationships and well-being. In Interdisciplinary research on close relationships: The case for integration (pp. 27–52). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13486-002
Valor-Segura I., Garrido-Macías M., Lozano L. M. (2020). Adaptation of the Accommodation among romantic couples scale (ARCS) to the Spanish population. Psichothema, 32(1), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2019.123
Williamson H. C., Bornstein J. X., Cantu V., Ciftci O., Farnish K. A., Schouweiler M. T. (2022). How diverse are the samples used to study intimate relationships? A systematic review. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(4), 1087–1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211053849
Wu D. C., Kim H. S., Collins N. L. (2021). Perceived responsiveness across cultures: The role of cultural fit in social support use. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(9), Article e12634. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12634

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: February 4, 2025

Keywords

  1. Intimate relationships
  2. perceived partner responsiveness
  3. Spanish adaptation
  4. validity evidence
  5. psychometric properties

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2025.
Request permissions for this article.

Open practices

  • Preregistration

Authors

Affiliations

María Alonso-Ferres
Hannah C. Williamson
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Notes

Inmaculada Valor-Segura, Department of Social Psychology, Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center (CIMCYC), University of Granada, Granada 18071, Spain. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 65

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text