![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Background:
Observational research methods are important for understanding people’s actions, roles and behaviour. However, these techniques are underused generally in healthcare research, including research in the palliative care field.
Aim:
The aim in this paper is to place qualitative observational data collection methods in their methodological context and provide an overview of issues to consider when using observation as a method of data collection. This paper discusses practical considerations when conducting palliative care research using observation.
Findings:
Observational data collection methods span research paradigms, and qualitative approaches contribute by their focus on ‘natural’ settings which allow the explanation of social processes and phenomena. In particular, they can facilitate understanding of what people do and how these can alter in response to situations and over time, especially where people find their own practice difficult to articulate. Observational studies can be challenging to carry out: we focus on the potentially problematic areas of sampling, consent and ethics, data collection and recording, data management and analysis.
Conclusion:
Qualitative observational data collection methods can contribute to theoretical and conceptual development and the explanation of social processes in palliative care. In particular this contribution to understanding care structures and processes should improve understanding of patients’ experiences of their care journey and thus impact on care outcomes.
References
| 1. |
Hammersley, M, Atkinson, P. Ethnography. Principles in practice. 3rd ed. Routledge: London, 2007. Google Scholar |
| 2. |
Froggatt, KA, Field, D, Bailey, C, Krishnasamy, M. Qualitative research in palliative care 1990–1999: a descriptive review. International Journal of Palliative Nursing 2003; 9(3): 98–104. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 3. |
Walshe, C, Luker, K. District nurses’ role in palliative care provision: a realist review. Int J Nurs Stud 2010; 47(9): 1167–1183. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 4. |
Griffiths, J, Ewing, G, Rogers, M. ‘Moving swiftly on’: psychological support provided by District Nurses to patients with palliative care needs. Cancer Nurs 2010; 35(5): 390–397. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 5. |
Ewing, G, Farquhar, M, Booth, S. Delivering palliative care in an acute hospital setting: views of referrers and specialist providers. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009; 38(3): 327–340. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 6. |
Walshe, C, Chew-Graham, C, Todd, C, Caress, A. What influences referrals within community palliative care services? A qualitative case study. Social Science & Medicine 2008; 67(1): 137–146. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 7. |
Guba, EG, Lincoln, YS. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994. Google Scholar |
| 8. |
Glaser, BG, Strauss, AL. Awareness contexts and social interaction. Am Sociol Rev 1964; 29(5): 669–679. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 9. |
James, N . Emotional labour. Sociol Rev 1989; 37: 15–42. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 10. |
Seymour, J . Ethnography. In: Addington-Hall, J, Bruera, E, Higginson, I, Payne, S (eds) Research methods in palliative care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007, pp. 211–225. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 11. |
Glaser, BG, Strauss, AL. Awareness of dying. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1966. Google Scholar |
| 12. |
Bonner, A, Tolhurst, G. Insider-outsider perspectives of participant observation. Nurse Researcher 2002; 9(4): 7–19. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 13. |
Gans, HJ . Participant observation in the era of ‘ethnography’. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 1999; 28(5): 540–548. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 14. |
Gold, R . Roles in sociological fieldwork. Soc Forces 1958; 36(3): 217–223. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 15. |
Pope, C . Conducting ethnography in medical settings. Med Educ 2005; 39: 1180–1187. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 16. |
Lawton, J . Contemporary hospice care: the sequestration of the unbounded body and ‘dirty dying’. Sociol Health Illn 1998; 20(2): 121–143. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 17. |
Griffiths, J, Ewing, G, Rogers, M, Barclay, S, Martin, A, McCabe, J. Supporting cancer patients with palliative care needs: District nurses’ role perceptions. Cancer Nurs 2007; 30(2): 156–162. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 18. |
Mills, M, Davies, HTO, Macrae, WA. Care of dying patients in hospital. BMJ 1994; 309(6954): 583–586. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 19. |
Bell, K . ‘If it almost kills you that means it’s working!’ Cultural models of chemotherapy expressed in a cancer support group. Social Science & Medicine 2009; 68(1): 169–176. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 20. |
Audrey, S, Abel, J, Blazeby, JM, Falk, S, Campbell, R. What oncologists tell patients about survival benefits of palliative chemotherapy and implications for informed consent: qualitative study. BMJ 2008; 337:a752, doi:10.1136/bmj.a752. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 21. |
Rogers, MS, Todd, CJ. The ‘right kind’ of pain: talking about symptoms in outpatient oncology consultations. Palliat Med 2000; 14(299): 307. Google Scholar |
| 22. |
Hannerz, U . Being there… and there… and there!: Reflections on multi-site ethnography. Ethnography 2003; 4(2): 201–216. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
| 23. |
Lofland, J . Analytic ethnography: features, failings, and futures. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 1995; 24(1): 30–67. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 24. |
Allen, D . Ethnomethodological insights into insider-outsider relationships in nursing ethnographies of healthcare settings. Nurs Inq 2004; 11: 14–24. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 25. |
Borbasi, S, Jackson, D, Wilkes, L. Fieldwork in nursing research: positionality, practicalities and predicaments. J Adv Nurs 2005; 51(5): 493–501. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 26. |
Lawton, J . The dying process. patients’ experiences of palliative care. London: Routledge, 2000. Google Scholar |
| 27. |
Seymour, JE . Negotiating natural death in intensive care. Social Science & Medicine 2000; 51(8): 1241–1252. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 28. |
Willard, C, Luker, K. Supportive care in the cancer setting: rhetoric or reality? Palliat Med 2005; 19(4): 328–333. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 29. |
Weigl, M, Müller, A, Zupanc, A, Angerer, P. Participant observation of time allocation, direct patient contact and simultaneous activities in hospital physicians. BMC Health Services Research 2009; 9(110), doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-110. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI |
| 30. |
Dean, RAK, Gregory, DM. Humor and laughter in palliative care: an ethnographic investigation. Palliative and Supportive Care 2004; 2: 139–148. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 31. |
Oeye, C, Bjelland, AK, Skorpen, A. Doing participant observation in a psychiatric hospital – research ethics resumed. Social Science & Medicine 2007; 65(11): 2296–2306. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 32. |
Briggs, K, Askham, J, Norman, I, Redfern, S. Accomplishing care at home for people with dementia: using observational methodology. Qual Health Res 2003; 13(2): 268–280. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
