Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Free access
Research article
First published online November 6, 2017

Neurovascular unit crosstalk: Pericytes and astrocytes modify cytokine secretion patterns of brain endothelial cells

Abstract

Crosstalk among brain endothelial cells (BECs), pericytes, and astrocytes occurs by way of soluble factors, including cytokines. Here, we studied cytokine secretion from both mouse BEC monocultures and tri-cultured with pericytes and astrocytes. Four cytokines were constitutively secreted by BEC monolayers, 12 by LPS-stimulated BECs, 10 by tri-cultures, and 14 by LPS-stimulated tri-cultures. Cytokine levels were generally higher with either LPS stimulation or tri-culture when compared to monocultures and highest in tri-cultures stimulated by LPS. LPS-stimulated secretions fell into eight patterns as categorized by the polarization of cytokine secretions. To determine the cellular origin of cytokine increases in tri-cultures, we cultured mouse BECs with human pericytes and astrocytes and measured cytokines in species-specific assays. Thus, cytokines detected in the human immunoassay were from pericytes/astrocytes and those detected in the mouse immunoassay were from BECs. Several unique patterns were thus found. For example, TNF-alpha was only of pericyte/astrocyte origin; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was only of BEC origin; IL-6, MCP-1, and GM-CSF of astrocyte/pericyte origin were found in both the luminal and abluminal chambers, suggesting the presence of brain-to-blood transporters. We conclude that crosstalk influences cytokine secretion under constitutive and stimulated conditions from both BECs and pericytes/astrocytes.

Introduction

The endothelial cells lining the arterioles and venules and forming the capillary bed of the central nervous system (CNS) are modified to form the vascular blood–brain barrier (BBB). These modifications include those which result in barrier function: the formation of tight junctions; the elimination of fenestrae; a reduction in macropinocytosis.1,2 Additionally, the modifications include the induction of transporters, enzymatic activities, and receptors unique to or enriched in the BBB.3 These modifications of the BBB result from its cross-talk with the other cells of the CNS in a formation termed the neurovascular unit (NVU).4 These other cells include the neurons, microglia, mast cells, but most especially the astrocytes and pericytes. Features of the BBB are first induced in the fetus by pericytes and, later, by astrocytes.5,6
Understanding this cross-talk and its mediators is critical to understanding how the barriers function both as protective to the CNS and in its roles as a blood-brain interface. Additionally, elucidation of cross-talk agents and mechanisms has already been shown to be important in understanding disease mechanisms, such as the role of pericytes in BBB functioning in Alzheimer’s disease, AIDS, and diabetes mellitus.79 Finally, understanding cross-talk will provide unique targets for the development of CNS therapeutics.10
The mediators of this cross-talk are largely unknown. However, immune-active agents such as nitric oxide, prostaglandins, and cytokines are secreted by brain endothelial cells (BECs), pericytes, astrocytes, and other cells of the NVU.1113 These agents are clearly involved in the functioning of the BBB and NVU cross-talk. For example, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) secreted from BECs mediate the LPS-enhanced passage of HIV-1 across the BBB.14 This passage is further enhanced by the presence of pericytes with the enhancement possibly mediated by the pericyte secretion of keratinocyte chemoattractant (KC) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1).7
The cross-talk among the various cells of the NVU is likely to result in the modification of the secretion of their cytokines. But this cross-talk is likely complex and its study is difficult, requiring unique tools. Here, we used the Transwell monolayer culture method to study the interactions among BECs, astrocytes, and pericytes in terms of barrier function and cytokine secretion. By culturing mouse BECs with human astrocytes and pericytes and then using species-specific immunoassays, we were able to determine the cellular source of cytokines and so the influence of one cell type on the secretions of another. We studied both basal secretions and LPS-induced secretions in monocultures (BECs alone) and tri-cultures (BECs, astrocytes, and pericytes). LPS is a powerful inducer of cytokine release from BECs, pericytes, and astrocytes.11,12,15 and also alters many other functions of the BBB, including altering BBB integrity, immune cell trafficking, and transporter functions.1619 Because the BBB is a polarized layer and pericytes and astrocytes are only on the abluminal side, we measured cytokine secretions in luminal and in abluminal chambers and the effects of LPS introduced either into the luminal or abluminal chambers. We were thus able to characterize the individual secretion patterns and NVU interactions for 15 cytokines.

Material and methods

Mouse and human glial cell cultures

Mouse mixed glial cell cultures were prepared according to McCarthy and de Vellis.20 Cerebral cortices of newborn mice (0–1 days old) were dissected, stripped of their meninges and mechanically dissociated by repeated pipetting followed by passage through a nylon mesh. Cells were plated onto poly-L-lysine (10 ug/ml; Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) pre-coated plastic and cultivated in DMEM containing 10% FCS, and 1% GlutaMAX (Gibco) at 37℃, 5% CO2 in water saturated atmosphere. Medium was changed twice a week. Cultures reach confluence after 8–10 days in vitro and were used between 14 and 20 days in vitro. Primary human astrocytes were obtained from ScienCell Research Laboratories (Carlsbad, USA) and cultured according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Mouse and human brain pericytes culture

Primary mouse brain pericytes were prepared according to Nakagawa et al.21 Briefly, the cultures of mouse cerebral pericytes were obtained by a prolonged, two-week culture of isolated brain microvessel fragments that contain pericytes and endothelial cells. Pericyte survival and proliferation were favored by selective culture conditions, using uncoated dishes, and DMEM F12 supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA), 1% GlutaMAX (Gibco) and gentamicin (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). Culture medium was changed twice a week. Primary human pericytes were obtained from ScienCell Research Laboratories (Carlsbad, USA) and cultured according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Mouse brain endothelial cultures

Primary mouse BECs were prepared according to Coisne et al.22 with modifications. Briefly, meninges were carefully removed from forebrains and gray matter was minced into small pieces. Preparations were pooled and ground with a Dounce homogenizer in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium/Nutrient Mixture F-12 Ham (DMEM/F12; Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with gentamicin (50 µg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). The resulting homogenate was mixed with 30% dextran (v/v, molecular weight 100,000–200,000, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 0.1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). The suspension was centrifuged at 3000 × g for 25 min at 4℃. The pellet was suspended in DMEM/F12, and the supernatant was centrifuged again under same conditions. After the second centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded and the pellet was re-suspended in DMEM/F12. Then the pellets were filtered through a 70 µm nylon mesh and digested in collagenase/dispase (2 mg/ml, Roche Applied Science, USA) and DNase I (10 µg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) for 30 min. The digested solution was filtered through a 20 µm nylon mesh and seeded on with collagen type IV/fibronectin-coated dishes (both form Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). Cultures were maintained in medium composed of DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% plasma-derived serum (PDS, Animal Technologies, Inc., USA), 1% GlutaMAX (Gibco), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; Roche Applied Sciences), heparin, insulin, transferrin and sodium selenite supplement and puromycin (4µg/ml, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). Twenty-four hours after plating, red blood cells, cell debris, and nonadherent cells were removed by washing with medium. On the third day, the puromycin was removed from medium. When the cultures reached 80% confluency (5th day in vitro), the purified endothelial cells were passaged by brief treatment with 0.25% Trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen, Life Technologies), and used to construct in vitro BBB models.

Tri-cultures and cell stimulation

Primary mouse brain pericytes or human brain pericytes (15,000 cells/cm2) were seeded on the bottom of the collagen-coated polyester membrane (0.33 cm2, 0.4 µm pore size) of the Transwell® inserts (24-well type, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). The pericytes were allowed to adhere firmly overnight. Endothelial cells (150,000 cells/cm2) were seeded the next day on the inside of the inserts (Figure 7). The inserts were then placed in the well of the 24-well plate cultured with astrocytes. BBB models were maintained in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% plasma-derived serum (PDS, Animal Technologies, Inc., USA), 1% GlutaMAX (Gibco), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; Roche Applied Sciences), heparin, insulin, transferrin and sodium selenite supplemented with hydrocortisone (500 nM; Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) at 37℃ in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air. Experiments were carried out three or four days after endothelial cells were seeded. For stimulation, experiment cells were washed with serum-free medium, and exposed to culture media with or without lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Salmonella typhimurium (L6511; Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) at 1 µg/ml for 24 h.

Transendothelial electrical resistance and permeability of markers

Transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER in Ω × cm2) was measured using an EVOM resistance meter (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA). The TEER of cell-free inserts was subtracted from the measured values. For the transport experiments, the medium was removed and inserts were washed with Krebs-Ringer-Phosphate-HEPES (KRPH) buffer containing 1% BSA (141 mM NaCl, 4.0 mM KCl, 2.8 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgSO4, 1.0 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM D-glucose and 1% BSA, pH 7.4). The KRPH buffer containing 1% BSA was added to the abluminal chamber of the Transwell® insert. To initiate the transport experiments, 125I-Albumin (labeled by chloramine T method; 5 × 106 cpm/ml) or 14C-Sucrose (1.5 × 106 cpm/ml; Perkin Elmer, USA) was loaded on the luminal chamber. Samples were removed from the abluminal chamber at 10, 20, 30 and 45 min and immediately replaced with an equal volume of fresh 1% BSA/KRPH buffer. 125I-Albumin samples were precipitated with TCA and the radioactivity was determined using a gamma counter. Radioactivity of 14C-Sucrose was measured in a liquid scintillation counter (Tri Carb 1900, Packard Instrument Company, Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences, Courtaboeuf, France). The permeability coefficient and clearance of 125I-Albumin and 14C-Sucrose was calculated according to the method described by Dehouck et al.23
Clearance was expressed as microliters of radioactive tracer diffusing from the luminal to abluminal chamber and was calculated using the initial amount of radioactivity in the loading chamber and the measured amount of radioactivity in the collected samples.
Clearance(μl)=[C]C×VC/[C]L
where [C]L is the initial amount of radioactivity per microliter of the solution loaded into the insert (in counts per minute per microliter), [C]C is the radioactivity per microliter in the collected sample (in counts per minute per microliter), and VC is the volume of collecting chamber (in microliters). The clearance volume increased linearly with time.
The volume cleared was plotted versus time, and the slope was estimated by linear regression analysis. The slope of clearance curves for the BMEC monolayer plus Transwell membrane was denoted by PSapp, where PS is the permeability × surface area product (in microliters per minute). The slope of the clearance curve with a Transwell membrane without BMECs was denoted by PSmembrane. The real PS value for the BMEC monolayer (PSe) was calculated from
1/PSapp=1/PSmembrane+1/PSe
The PSe values were divided by the surface area of the Transwell inserts to generate the endothelial permeability coefficient (Pe, in microliters per minute per square centimeter).

ELISA cytokines

Concentrations of mouse and human cytokines and chemokines secreted to the culture media were measured by commercial magnetic bead-based Multiplex ELISA kit (Bioplex, Biorad, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Of the 23 cytokines in the mouse kit, we detected 15 different cytokines: Interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha), IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL12(p40), IL-12(p70), IL-13, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), GM-CSF, eotaxin, KC, monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1 alpha), MIP-1 beta, chemokine (C–C motif) ligand 5 (RANTES), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). The 17-plex was used to measure human cytokines and had 10 cytokines in common with the mouse kit: IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-12(p70), IL-13, G-CSF, GM-CSF, MCP-1, MIP-1 beta, TNF-alpha, and IL-8, the human equivalent of murine KC.

Immunocytochemistry

Cells on inserts were washed in PBS and fixed with 4% PFA for 10 min at 4℃. Cells were permeabilized with 0.2% TRITON-X100, blocked with 5% BSA and then incubated with anti- claudin-5, ZO-1 and occludin antibodies (all from Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), followed by incubation with corresponding ALEXA Fluor-488 conjugated secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Finally, the membranes were cut out of the inserts, mounted in fluorescence mounting media and photographed with a Nikon ECLIPSE E8000 fluorescence microscope.

Data analysis

All experiments were done in triplicates and repeated once (n = 6). Values are presented as the means ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA (GraphPad Prism). Newman–Keul’s multiple comparison tests was used for post hoc comparison. Differences at P < 0.05 were accepted as statistically significant.

Results

Effect of mouse pericytes and mouse astrocytes on tight junction proteins and permeability

Both monocultures (mouse endothelial cells) and tri-cultures (mouse endothelial cells, mouse pericytes, and mouse astrocytes) showed the appearance of the tight junction proteins claudin-5, ZO-1, and occludin. However, tri-cultures tended to have more of the claudin-5 and ZO-1 located at inter-endothelial interfaces and less within cytoplasm (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Immunohistochemistry of the tight junction proteins claudin-5, ZO-1, and occludin. Upper panels (a–c) are monocultures of mouse brain endothelial cells (EOO) and lower panels (d–f) are tri-cultures of mouse brain endothelial cells, mouse pericytes, and mouse astrocytes (EPA). Both monocultures and tri-cultures expressed tight junction proteins. Tri-cultures tended to have more of the tight junction proteins located at the intercellular interface and less in cytoplasm.
Only tri-cultures significantly increased TEER as measured in Figure 2(a); co-cultures with either pericytes alone or astrocytes alone did not increase TEER to a statistically significant level. Permeability to 14C-sucrose was decreased when co-cultured with astrocytes, and even more so when co-cultured with pericytes or pericytes plus astrocytes (Figure 2(b)). Co-culture with pericytes was as effective at decreasing permeability to 14C-sucrose as tri-culture. Permeability to I-Albumin was not affected with co-culture or tri-culture (Figure 2(c)).
Figure 2. Effects of astrocytes and pericytes on brain endothelial cell monolayer permeability. Panel A shows that only tri-culture with both pericytes and astrocytes improved TEER; n = 5–6; ANOVA: F(3,18) = 11.6, p < 0.001; Newman–Keuls: ***p < 0.001 EOO vs EPA. Panel B shows that as measured by leakiness to sucrose, astrocytes improved barrier function and pericytes even more so. Adding both pericytes and astrocytes was not more effective than culturing with pericytes only; n = 3–4; ANOVA: F(3,10) = 52.4, p < 0.001; Newman–Keuls: *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. Panel C shows that neither astrocytes nor pericytes improved BBB leakiness as measured with albumin. Panel D: Mouse brain endothelial cells were tri-cultured with mouse or human pericytes and astrocytes. Pericytes/astrocytes from either species greatly increased TEER, although mouse pericytes/astrocytes were statistically more effective. LPS dramatically disrupted barrier as evidenced by a decrease in TEER regardless of presence or species of pericytes/astrocytes; ANOVA: F(8,119) = 174, p<<0.001; Newman–Keuls: **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. EOO: Mouse brain endothelial cell monocultures; EOA: Mouse brain endothelial cells co-cultured with mouse astrocytes; EPO: Mouse brain endothelial cells co-cultured with mouse pericytes; EPA: Mouse brain endothelial cells tri-cultured with mouse pericytes and mouse astrocytes; E + hPA: Mouse brain endothelial cell tri-cultured with human pericytes and human astrocytes.

Effect of human pericytes/astrocytes vs mouse pericytes/astrocytes on TEER

Pericytes and astrocytes of either human or mouse origin significantly improved the permeability of monolayers of mouse endothelial cells, although cells of murine origin were somewhat superior (Figure 2(d)). LPS reduced TEER of the monoculture and of the tri-cultures. LPS was equally effective in reducing TEER in tri-cultures with human or with murine pericytes/astrocytes and when placed in either the luminal or abluminal chambers.

Mouse pericytes/astrocytes and cytokine secretions

Of the 23 cytokines assayed, 4 were spontaneously secreted in monocultures of mouse BECs: G-CSF, KC, MCP-1, and RANTES (Figures 3 and 6). These were secreted into both the luminal and abluminal chambers. In tri-cultures of BECs, murine pericytes, and murine astrocytes, these four cytokines were still secreted, although generally in somewhat higher amounts. In addition, six other cytokines were secreted: IL-6, IL-13, TNF-alpha, eotaxin, MIP-1 alpha, and MIP-1 beta. For these six cytokines, abluminal levels were generally higher than luminal levels with the exception of eotaxin.
Figure 3. Constitutive secretion of cytokines by monocultures and tri-cultures. Four cytokines (G-CSF, MCP-1, KC, and RANTES) were constitutively secreted by mouse BEC. When tri-cultured with murine pericytes and astrocytes, six other cytokines (IL-6, IL-13, TNF-alpha, eotaxin, MIP-1 alpha, and MIP-1 beta) were also secreted. EOO: Mouse brain endothelial cell monoculutures; EPA: Mouse brain endothelial cells tri-cultured with mouse pericytes and mouse astrocytes; n = 6/group.
In another experiment, the same four cytokines and only these four cytokines (G-CSF, KC, MCP-1, and RANTES) were spontaneously secreted by monocultures of BEC (Figure 4). LPS placed in either the luminal or abluminal chamber of BEC monocultures greatly increased the secretion of these cytokines and in addition stimulated the release of eight other cytokines: IL-1 alpha, IL-6, IL-12(p40), IL-13, GM-CSF, MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, and TNF-alpha. When tri-cultures that consisted of all murine cells were exposed to LPS, all the cytokines seen with tri-cultures without LPS plus all the cytokines seen with monocultures plus LPS were observed except for IL-1 alpha, but IL-1 beta and IL-12(p70) were also seen (Figure 6).
Figure 4. Effects of LPS on cytokine secretion patterns in mouse brain endothelial cells in monocultures or tri-cultured with murine pericytes/astrocytes. Patterns for 26 cytokines are shown (Figure 4(a) to (z)). LPS was given either into the luminal or the abluminal chambers and cytokines measured in both the luminal (L) and abluminal (A) chambers. IL-1 alpha was detected in monocultures of BECs, but not in tri-cultures, whereas IL-1 beta, IL-12(p70), and eotaxin were detected in tri-cultures, but not in monocultures of BECs (n = 3–4/group. Newman–Keuls done for cytokines with ANOVA having p < 0.05. single letter (e.g. “a”) p < 0.05; double letter (e.g. “aa”) p < 0.01; triple letter (e.g. “aaa”) p < 0.001); a: luminal LPS increases luminal secretion; b: luminal LPS increases abluminal secretion; c: luminal LPS increases luminal secretion more than abluminal secretion; d: abluminal LPS increases luminal secretion; e: abluminal LPS increases abluminal secretion; f: abluminal LPS results in differences between luminal and abluminal levels; g: luminal secretion is greater with luminal LPS than with abluminal LPS; h: abluminal secretion is greater with abluminal LPS than with luminal LPS. EOO: Mouse brain endothelial cell monocultures; EPA: Mouse brain endothelial cell tri-cultured with mouse pericytes and mouse astrocytes; L-luminal chamber; A-abluminal chamber.
Of the 11 cytokines secreted by both LPS-stimulated monolayers and LPS-stimulated tri-cultures (G-CSF, KC, MCP-1, RANTES, IL-6, IL-13, MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, TNF, IL-12(P40), GM-CSF), the levels secreted by the LPS-stimulated tri-cultures tended to be higher than those in the LPS-stimulated BEC monocultures, in some cases 10–100 fold higher. IL-1 alpha, KC, and GM-CSF were exceptions. IL-1 alpha was only seen in LPS-stimulated monocultures of LPS, but not in LPS-stimulated or unstimulated tri-cultures. Secretion of KC was about 10 times lower in LPS-stimulated tri-cultures than in LPS-stimulated monocultures. GM-CSF expression was induced in LPS-stimulated monocultures of BEC but was not further enhanced in LPS-stimulated tri-cultures.
Previous results have suggested both that cytokine secretion differs from the luminal vs abluminal side of BECs and that the response to luminal vs. abluminal LPS may vary.11 Therefore, we measured cytokine levels in the luminal and abluminal chambers after placing LPS in either the luminal or abluminal chamber. The statistical comparisons for each cytokine in Figure 4 showed eight secretion patterns:

Luminal LPS

a.
Increases luminal secretion (indicated statistically in Figure 4 as “a”).
b.
Increases abluminal secretion (indicated statistically in Figure 4 as “b”).
c.
Increases luminal secretion more than abluminal secretion (indicated statistically in Figure 4 as “c”).

Abluminal LPS

a.
Increases luminal secretion (indicated statistically in Figure 4 as “d”).
b.
Increases abluminal secretion (indicated statistically in Figure 4 as “e”).
c.
Produces secretion levels that differ between luminal and abluminal chambers (indicated statistically in Figure 4 as “f”).
d.
Luminal secretion is greater with luminal LPS than with abluminal LPS (indicated statistically in Figure 4 as “g”).
e.
Abluminal secretion is greater with abluminal LPS than with luminal LPS (indicated statistically in Figure 4 with “h”).
With these eight patterns, cytokine secretion could be profiled. In the monocultures, for example, IL-6, IL-12(p40), G-CSF, and MCP-1 all showed the same pattern: Luminal LPS increased their luminal and abluminal levels with luminal levels being higher; abluminal LPS increased their luminal and abluminal levels, again with luminal levels being higher; LPS produced the same pattern regardless of whether it was given into the luminal or abluminal chamber.
In monocultures, KC, MIP-1 alpha, and RANTES produced the same pattern: Luminal LPS increased luminal and abluminal levels, but there was no difference between luminal and abluminal levels; abluminal LPS increased luminal and abluminal levels, but again no difference between luminal and abluminal levels; LPS produced the same pattern regardless of whether it was placed in the luminal vs. abluminal chamber.
The tri-cultures produced very different patterns from the monocultures in their responses to luminal and abluminal LPS. The most common pattern was exhibited by IL-1beta, IL-6, IL-12(p40), IL-12(p70), MIP-1alpha, and MIP-1beta. For these six cytokines, luminal LPS did not produce any statistically significant effect; abluminal LPS produced a statistically significant increase in abluminal, but not luminal levels; abluminal secretions were higher with abluminal than with luminal LPS. In the cases of IL-6, MIP-1alpha, and MIP-1beta, the lack of an effect of luminal LPS is surprising because the luminal LPS produced arithmetic increases that were equal to or greater than those seen in the BEC monocultures. It may be that the very large increases that occurred with abluminal LPS statistically overwhelmed the luminal LPS changes, causing them to be underpowered. Alternatively, factors produced by pericytes/astrocytes could be suppressing BEC cytokine production when induced by luminal LPS.
A paradoxic pattern for pattern “f” occurred between the monocultures and tri-cultures. In those cases when abluminal and luminal levels of a cytokine differed after abluminal LPS, the abluminal levels were always higher in the tri-cultures, but always lower in the monocultures of BECs.

Human pericytes/astrocytes and cytokine secretion

These patterns raised the question of the respective roles of endothelial cells vs. that of the pericytes and astrocytes in terms of cytokine secretions under both spontaneous and LPS-stimulated conditions. To investigate the respective roles of endothelial cells vs that of pericytes and astrocytes, we repeated the experiments with tri-cultures in which murine endothelial cells were cultured with human pericytes and human astrocytes. By then measuring cytokine levels with ELISAs that were specific for human or for mouse cytokines, we could determine the source of cytokine production (Figures 5 and 7). The human cytokine kit had 10 cytokines in common that had also been previously detected in the murine cell only experiments and therefore available for this sort of analysis: IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL-12(p70), IL-13, G-CSF, GM-CSF, MCP-1, MIP-1 beta, TNF-alpha, and IL-8, the human equivalent of murine KC. Of these, six were detected in either the mouse or human assays: GM-CSF, G-CSF, IL-8, MCP-1, IL-6, and TNF. G-CSF was only secreted by BECs, whereas IL-8 and TNF were only of pericyte/astrocyte origin. IL-6, MCP-1, and GM-CSF were of both endothelial and pericyte/astrocyte origin. All five cytokines secreted by pericytes/astrocytes were found in the luminal fluid and for MCP-1, GM-CSF, and TNF-alpha their luminal and abluminal concentrations were similar. This suggests that a robust brain-to-blood transfer mechanism may be present for these cytokines. Of the four cytokines secreted by endothelial cells, GM-CSF was only found in the luminal compartment, suggesting it is only secreted from the luminal surface. IL-6, MCP-1 and G-CSF of endothelial origin were found in both the luminal and abluminal chambers. For IL-6 and G-CSF, the two compartments had similar levels, but for BEC, MCP-1 was primarily luminal, suggesting preferential secretion from that surface.
Figure 5. Cell sources of cytokines in tri-cultures. By culturing mouse brain endothelial cells with human astrocytes/pericytes and then using species specific immunoassays, we were able to identify which cytokines were from brain endothelial cells (detected in the murine immunoassay) or pericytes/astrocytes (detected in the human immunoassay). Six of a possible 10 cytokines so detected are shown here; additionally, there was a notable absence of KC. En-Lum: Brain endothelial secretion in luminal chamber; PA-Lum: Pericyte/astrocyte secretion in luminal chamber; En-Abl: Brain endothelial secretion in abluminal chamber; PA-Abl: Pericyte/astrocyte secretion in abluminal chamber; LPS-Lum: LPS added to the luminal chamber; LPS-Abl: LPS added to the abluminal chamber.
Figure 6. Summarized from Figures 3 and 4. An increase in the number of cytokines secreted occurred with exposure to LPS and with tri-culturing. E: endothelial cells; EPA: endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes
Figure 7. Summarized from Figure 5. Origin and occurrence of six cytokines as determined in tri-cultures of mouse brain endothelial cells and human pericytes/astrocytes. Orange indicates secretion by brain endothelial cells, green indicates pericyte/astrocyte origin. Note several cytokines of pericyte/astrocyte origin appeared in the luminal chamber, indicating passage across the BEC monolayer barrier. Larger font indicates a higher level of cytokine.
These culture results clarify some of the findings of Figures 3 (monocultures of BECs) and 4 (mouse tri-cultures). The most robust response of IL-6 in mouse tri-cultures was abluminal secretion after abluminal LPS. The results in Figure 5 show that IL-6 is secreted by BECs, but most of its release after either abluminal or luminal LPS is from pericytes/astrocytes. MCP-1 was present in high amounts in BEC monocultures and responded vigorously to abluminal and luminal LPS. In mouse tri-cultures, the most robust response was in abluminal levels after abluminal LPS. We found that MCP-1 was of BEC and pericyte/astrocyte origin and both categories of cells responded to LPS. For GM-CSF, the primary difference was that mouse tri-cultures had higher abluminal levels after abluminal LPS than BEC monocultures; otherwise, LPS had little effect on GM-CSF levels in either mouse monocultures or mouse tri-cultures. In the mouse + human cultures (Figure 5), GM-CSF responses resembled BEC monocultures more than mouse tri-cultures in that the abluminal increase in levels in response to abluminal LPS did not occur. GM-CSF in the absence of LPS was primarily of pericyte/astrocyte origin, but these cells did not increase secretion with LPS; rather, the large increases in GM-CSF were due to BEC secretion. TNF levels were barely detectable in BEC monocultures even with LPS. Even in mouse tri-cultures, only abluminal levels after abluminal LPS were in the reliably detectable range. The mouse + human studies only found TNF of pericyte/astrocyte origin. G-CSF levels in BEC monocultures favored secretion into the luminal surface, but in mouse tri-cultures, not only were levels higher overall, but abluminal LPS resulted in abluminal levels that were equal to luminal levels. This would be consistent with pericyte/astrocyte production predominating in this condition, but the mouse + human cultures showed that G-CSF was essentially of BEC origin; even with abluminal LPS, very little of the abluminal G-CSF (less than 1%) was of pericyte/astrocyte origin. KC levels in BEC monocultures were increased by LPS (either luminal or abluminal) about 10 fold greater than in mouse tri-cultures. KC is only of mouse origin, whereas IL-8 is its human equivalent, so this indicates that pericytes/astrocytes are inhibiting BEC secretion of KC. In the mouse + human studies, KC was totally absent, but IL-8 was present. This suggests a scenario that although BECs are capable of both constitutive and inducible release of KC/IL-8, pericyte/astrocytes suppress BEC secretions and themselves become the major source of KC/IL-8.

Discussion

These studies were designed to assess the interactions of pericytes and astrocytes with BECs. We mainly focused on cytokine and chemokine secretions as these secretions, as discussed in the introduction, have previously been shown to play important roles in autocrine and paracrine communications within the NVU. Advantages of the current study were our use of multi-analyte technology so that we could determine whether there were generalized patterns for many cytokines, assessment of both luminal and abluminal secretions so that we could assess polarized secretion, our comparison of varying conditions (monocultures vs tri-cultures, constitutive vs stimulated, luminal vs. abluminal LPS) so as to assess the influences of cross talk, activation, and polarized stimulation, and use of species specific assays so that we could determine whether the cellular source of a cytokine was BECs or pericytes/astrocytes.
Cross-talk was evident from the effects of co- and tri-cultures on induction of barrier functions in monolayers of mouse BECs. As previously noted, the addition of other cells of the NVU appeared to affect translocation of the tight junction proteins out of cytoplasm and to the inter-endothelial surface;24 here, this was especially true for ZO-1 and claudin-5. We also found that permeability as measured by TEER, sucrose, or albumin was differentially affected by co- and tri-culturing. This probably reflects the different aspects of BBB permeability that these measures inventory. A decrease in TEER depends on patent pathways between the luminal and abluminal chambers.25 As such, TEER measures primarily paracellular permeability. Albumin can also cross via the paracellular pathway when that pathway is robustly opened;26,27 otherwise, an increase in albumin leakage can reflect the re-introduction of transcytotic and transcellular pathways.28 Sucrose, as a small water soluble molecule, can cross via openings in the paracellular pathway too small to allow albumin to cross, transcytotic pathways, and to a very limited extent can cross by transcellular diffusion.29,30 We found that the leakage of these substances across the monolayers was differentially affected by the presence of pericytes and astrocytes, consistent the different mechanisms by which the BBB can become disrupted.
Only four cytokines were spontaneously secreted by monocultures of BEC’s and these were found in both the luminal and abluminal chambers: G-CSF, KC, MCP-1, and RANTES (Figures 3 and 6). This is consistent with previous studies showing that cytokines can be secreted independently from either the luminal or abluminal surface of BECs.11,14 The luminal and abluminal concentrations did not differ statistically for any of these four cytokines and in comparison to tri-cultures and LPS-stimulated studies, levels were low.
Tri-cultures and LPS-stimulated monocultures of BEC each secreted the same four cytokines seen in unstimulated monocultures of BEC, but at much higher levels, and secreted additional cytokines as well. We found five cytokines (IL-6, IL-13, MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, and TNF) that were additionally secreted by both LPS stimulation of monocultures and by unstimulated tri-cultures. This suggests that for these cytokines, pericyte/astrocyte cross-talk with BECs and LPS shares some fundamental pathways. In contrast, there were cytokines that were unique to LPS stimulation of monocultures of BECs (i.e. not seen with tri-cultures: IL12p40, GM-CSF, IL-1 alpha) and unique to tri-cultures (eotaxin), consistent with these conditions not being totally interchangeable or synonymous.It may be that TNF should be reclassified as a cytokine unique to the tri-cultures, considering that it was barely detectable in LPS-stimulated BEC monocultures. As discussed below, there is evidence that TNF is not of BEC origin.
Combining LPS stimulation with tri-cultures did not simply produce an additive effect, but produced a somewhat unique cytokine secretion pattern. Specifically, two additional cytokines were secreted (IL-1 beta and IL12(p70)) and IL-1 alpha was no longer secreted. This suggests that synergism does occur between the effects of pericytes/astrocytes and those of LPS. The loss of IL-1 alpha also suggests that not all influences are stimulatory, but that some were inhibitory. However, the vast majority of influences were found to be stimulatory; in no case, for example, was a cytokine level decreased by LPS treatment. The only other clear example of an inhibitory influence was that KC levels were lower in LPS-stimulated tri-cultures than in LPS-stimulated BEC monocultures.
Evidence for polarization was most strongly seen with LPS stimulation. In the monocultures, both luminal and abluminal LPS produced greater increases in the luminal than abluminal chambers, with only MIP-1 alpha, MIP-1 beta, and RANTES being exceptions. Two cytokines showed a differential response to where LPS was placed: GM-CSF was higher in the luminal chamber after luminal than after abluminal LPS and MIP-1 beta was higher in the abluminal chamber after abluminal than after luminal LPS.
The main polarization effect in tri-cultures occurred for IL-1 beta, IL-6, IL12(p40), IL12(p70), MIP-1 alpha, and MIP-1 beta in that abluminal LPS produced much higher abluminal levels than luminal LPS. Polarization allows the BBB to differentially respond to luminal and abluminal insults. Polarization also allows the BBB to receive input from one side (e.g. the brain side) and to release cytokine from the other (e.g. blood) side, as exemplified by the ability of luminal adiponectin to modulate the abluminal secretion of IL-6 in BEC monolayers.31 Thus, polarization could be the basis for forming a neuroimmune axis capable of conveying information from one side of the BBB to the other side.
The different patterns obtained between monocultures and tri-cultures raised the question of how pericytes/astrocytes are altering secretion patterns. Are they also secreting cytokines or are they modifying cytokine secretion from the single cell source of the BEC? To address this question, we repeated the experiment in Figure 4 using mouse BECs but using human astrocytes and pericytes instead of mouse astrocytes and pericytes. By then assaying luminal and abluminal fluids using assays that are species-specific for human or for mouse cytokines, we could determine whether a cytokine was being secreted by BECs or by the pericytes and astrocytes. Finding that TEER was improved nearly as much by tri-culture with human pericytes/astrocytes as by mouse pericytes/astrocytes supported the assumption that mouse BEC cells were in cross-talk with human pericytes/astrocytes. Both types of LPS-treated tri-cultures also showed a very small preservation of TEER in comparison to the LPS-treated monoculture, possibly reflecting the protection glial cells can offer against LPS-mediated BBB injury.32
Using this approach, we found a variety of patterns of cross-talk between BECs and pericytes/astrocytes (Figures 5 and 7). Figure 5 shows cytokines that had detectable levels in either the murine or human immunoassays. For several of these cytokines, knowing cellular origin aids in better understanding their functions as previously elucidated.
TNF-alpha is known to have many interactions with the BBB, including disrupting the BBB and being transported by it.33,34 Its transport across the BBB has been linked to its ability to mediate toxicity in animal models of chemobrain and Parkinson’s.35,36 Surprisingly, its secretion from in vitro in cultures of BECs is rarely reported. The results here show that TNF is not readily secreted by BECs, even when stimulated with LPS, but was here of pericyte/astrocyte origin.
IL-6 has been one of the most reported cytokines to be secreted in BEC monolayer cultures.15,37 IL-6 interactions with BECs and the BBB include its transport, increased immune cell adhesion, enhanced iron transport, and nitric oxide secretion.17,3840 In studies that used only murine cells (Figure 4), IL-6 was not spontaneously secreted, whereas LPS stimulation produced much higher levels in the tri-cultures than in the monocultures. Not surprisingly then, Figure 5 shows that most of the IL-6 was derived from pericytes/astrocytes and less from endothelial cells. This was true even for luminal chamber IL-6 levels after abluminal LPS, suggesting that IL-6 crossed from the abluminal to the luminal chamber.
Figure 4 showed that tri-culture had little effect on the magnitude of GM-CSF secretion, except for increased abluminal levels after abluminal LPS. Figure 5 shows that BECs were the main source of GM-CSF with LPS stimulation. However, some luminal GM-CSF was derived from pericytes/astrocytes and all of the abluminal GM-CSF was from pericytes/astrocytes. This would suggest that GM-CSF is able to cross BECs in the brain-to-blood direction but that it is neither secreted from the abluminal surface of the BEC nor transported in the blood-to-brain direction. The luminal presence of IL-6 and GM-CSF is consistent with these two cytokines mediating the LPS-induced increase in transport of HIV-1 across BEC monolayers.14 In that case, IL-6 and GM-CSF were proposed to act in autocrine fashion; the findings here are consistent with that hypothesis.
In Figure 4, G-CSF showed higher levels in both the luminal and abluminal chambers after LPS in the monoculture with even higher levels in the tri-cultures. Figure 5, however, shows that nearly all of the G-CSF was of BEC origin. Thus, pericytes/astrocytes increased G-CSF levels primarily through increasing BEC production rather than directly releasing it themselves. Evidence suggests that parenchymal brain cells are a source of G-CSF,41 but the current results suggest that pericytes/astrocytes are not among those cell types. G-CSF is protective in several models of brain injury, including traumatic brain injury.4244 G-CSF levels in blood have been proposed as a biomarker for acute traumatic brain injury and stroke.45,46 Its blood levels correlate with brain G-CSF levels and brain levels, in turn, correlate with the brain levels of a number of other cytokines. Thus, blood G-CSF levels are a reflection of post-traumatic neuroinflammation. These therapeutic and biomarker characteristics of G-CSF can be partially explained by its ability to cross the BBB,47 but its vascular secretion could also play a role.
This approach of using species-specific assays was thus useful in determining the cellular source of cytokines in tri-culture, the movement of cytokines across the BECs monolayer, and the interactions between pericytes/astrocytes and BECs. One shortcoming of this approach is that a cell of one species may not respond to the cytokine of another. A classic example of this is that human TNF-alpha binds to the rodent p55 receptor but not to the rodent p75 receptor.48 However, the improved TEER values seen in tri-cultures were only slightly less when the cells were mouse BECs plus human pericytes/astrocytes than when the cells were all mouse (Figure 2(d)). Thus, at least for TEER, this interspecies factor produced only a minor effect. However, decreased cross talk between cells because of species differences may be why we detected only 6 of the possible 10 cytokines with this approach.
Just as cells may not respond to stimulatory signals because of species differences, they may also not respond to inhibitory signals. This may explain why KC decreased when cultures were exposed to LPS and why it disappeared altogether when tri-cultured with human pericytes/astrocytes, although the human version of KC, IL-8, was present. This suggests that signals from BECs inhibit secretion of interferon-gamma and KC/IL-8 from pericytes/astrocytes.
Five cytokines of pericyte/astrocyte origin (IL-8, IL-6, GM-CSF, TNF, and MCP-1) were detected in the luminal chamber as well as the abluminal chamber. In most cases, levels in the abluminal and luminal chamber were similar. Such high levels suggest their appearance was not caused by leakage, but suggests that these cytokines may have been able to cross the BEC barrier in the abluminal to luminal direction. Only IL-2 and CCL1149,50 have been shown in vivo to have saturable transport systems in the brain-to-blood direction, but these results suggest that such systems may be much more common than originally thought. The ability of cytokines produced within the CNS to cross the BBB and enter the bloodstream provides a pathway by which the CNS can influence peripheral immune functions.
In conclusion, we examined the interactions of elements of the NVU in terms of BBB integrity and cytokine secretion. Overall, we confirmed that pericytes/astrocytes affect tight junction cytoarchitcture and BEC barrier functions as measured by TEER and sucrose permeability. We found that tri-cultures of BECs, pericytes, and astrocytes have different patterns of cytokine secretion both spontaneously and in response to LPS. In general, either tri-cultures or stimulation with LPS produced more and higher levels of cytokines. By culturing murine BECs with human pericytes/astrocytes and determining cytokine levels with species-specific immunoassays, we were able in several cases to study the cellular origin, movement, and cellular interactions of specific cytokines in the tri-cultures. We found different, individual patterns for the six cytokines so studied with these patterns providing evidence of cross-talk among the cells that comprise the NVU.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by NIH RO1 AG046619 and Veterans Affairs.

References

1. Brightman MW, Reese TS. Junctions between intimately apposed cell membranes in the vertebrate brain. J Cell Biol 1969; 40: 648–677.
2. Reese TS, Karnovsky MJ. Fine structural localization of a blood-brain barrier to endogenous peroxidase. J Cell Biol 1967; 34: 207–217.
3. Davson H and Segal MB. Special aspects of the blood-brain barrier. In: Physiology of the CSF and blood-brain barriers. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1996, pp.303–485.
4. Hawkins BT, Davis TP. The blood-brain barrier/neurovascular unit in health and disease. Pharmacol Rev 2005; 57: 173–185.
5. Daneman R, Zhou L, Kebede AA, et al. Pericytes are required for blood-brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature 2010; 468: 562–566.
6. Saunders NR, Daneman R, Dziegielewska KM, et al. Transporters of the blood-brain and blood-CSF interfaces in development and in the adult. Mol Aspects Med 2013; 34: 742–752.
7. Dohgu S, Banks WA. Brain pericytes increase the lipopolysaccharide-enhanced transcytosis of HIV-1 free virus across the in vitro blood-brain barrier: evidence for cytokine-mediated pericyte-endothelial cell cross talk. Fluids Barriers CNS 2013; 10: 23.
8. Shah GN, Morofuji Y, Banks WA, et al. High glucose-induced mitochondrial resistance and reactive oxygen species in mouse cerebral pericytes is reversed by pharmacological inhibition of mitochondrial carbonic anhydrase: implications for cerebral microvascular disease in diabetes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2013; 440: 354–358.
9. Sagare AP, Bell RD, Zhao Z, et al. Pericyte loss influences Alzheimer-like neurodegeneration in mice. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 2932.
10. Banks WA. From blood-brain barrier to blood-brain interface: new opportunities for CNS drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2016; 15: 275–292.
11. Verma S, Nakaoke R, Dohgu S, et al. Release of cytokines by brain endothelial cells: a polarized response to lipopolysaccharide. Brain Behav Immun 2006; 20: 449–455.
12. Kovac A, Erickson MA, Banks WA. Brain microvascular pericytes are immunoactive in culture: cytokine, chemokine, nitric oxide, and LRP-1 expression in response to lipopolysaccharide. J Neuroinflamm 2011; 8: 139.
13. Nath A, Conant K, Chen P, Scott C, et al. Transient exposure to HIV-1 Tat protein results in cytokine production in macrophages and astrocytes: a hit and run phenomenon. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 17098–17102.
14. Dohgu S, Fleegal-DeMotta MA, Banks WA. Lipopolysaccharide-enhanced transcellular transport of HIV-1 across the blood-brain barrier is mediated by luminal microvessel IL-6 and GM-CSF. J Neuroinflamm 2011; 8: 167.
15. Reyes TM, Fabry Z, Coe CL. Brain endothelial cell production of a neuroprotective cytokine, interleukin-6, in response to noxious stimuli. Brain Res 1999; 851: 215–220.
16. Veszelka S, Pasztoi M, Farkas AE, et al. Pentosan polysulfate protects brain endothelial cells against bacterial lipopolysaccharide-induced damages. Nerurochem Int 2007; 50: 219–228.
17. De Vries HE, Moor AC, Blom-Roosemalen MC, et al. Lymphocyte adhesion to brain capillary endothelial cells in vitro. J Neuroimmunol 1994; 52: 1–8.
18. Eckman PL, King WM, Brunson JG. Studies on the blood-brain barrier. I. Effects produced by a single injection of gram-negative endotoxin on the permeability of the cerebral vessels. Am J Pathol 1958; 34: 631–643.
19. Pan W, Yu C, Hsuchou H, Zhang Y, et al. Neuroinflammation facilitates LIF entry into brain: role of TNF. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008; 294: C1436–C1442.
20. McCarthy KD, de Vellis J. Preparation of separate astroglial and oligodendroglial cell cultures from rat cerebral tissue. J Cell Biol 1980; 85: 890–902.
21. Nakagawa S, Deli MA, Kawaguchi H, et al. A new blood-brain barrier model using primary rat brain endothelial cells, pericytes and astrocytes. Neurochem Int 2009; 54: 253–263.
22. Coisne C, Dehouck L, Faveeuw C, et al. Mouse syngenic in vitro blood-brain barrier model: a new tool to examine inflammatory events in cerebral endothelium. Labor Invest 2005; 85: 734–746.
23. Dehouck MP, Meresse S, Delorme P, et al. An easier, reproducible, and mass-production method to study the blood-brain barrier in vitro. J Neurochem 1990; 54: 1798–1801.
24. Stamatovic SM, Shakui P, Keep RF, et al. Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 regulation of blood-brain barrier permeability. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2005; 25: 593–606.
25. Benson K, Cramer S, Galla HJ. Impedance-based cell monitoring: barrier properties and beyond. Fluids Barriers CNS 2013; 10: 5.
26. Ziylan YZ, Robinson PJ, Rapoport SI. Blood-brain barrier permeability to sucrose and dextran after osmotic opening. Am J Physiol 1984; 247: R634–R638.
27. Mayhan WG, Heistad DD. Permeability of blood-brain barrier to various sized molecules. Am J Physiology 1985; 248: H712–H718.
28. Lossinsky AS, Vorbrodt AW, Wisniewski HM. Ultracytochemical studies of vesicular and canalicular transport structures in the injured mammalian blood-brain barrier. ACTA Neuropathol 1983; 61: 239–245.
29. Favarato M, Zatta P, Perazzolo M, et al. Aluminum(III) influences the permeability of the blood-brain barrier to [14 C]sucrose in rats. Brain Res 1992; 569: 330–335.
30. Kim YS, Lee MH, Wisniewski HM. Aluminum induced reversible change in permeability of the blood-brain barrier to [14 C]sucrose. Brain Res 1986; 377: 286–291.
31. Spranger J, Verma S, Gohring I, et al. Adiponectin does not cross the blood-brain barrier, but modifies cytokine expression of brain endothelial cells. Diabetes 2006; 55: 141–147.
32. Descamps L, Coisne C, Dehouck B, et al. Protective effect of glial cells against lipopolysaccharide-mediated blood-brain barrier injury. Glia 2003; 42: 46–58.
33. Deli MA, Descamps L, Dehouck MP, et al. Exposure of tumor necrosis factor alpha to luminal membrane of bovine brain capillary endothelial cells cocultured with astrocytes induces a delayed increase of permeability and cytoplasmic stress fiber formation of actin. J Neurosci Res 1995; 41: 717–726.
34. Rosenberg GA, Estrada EY, Dencoff JE, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced gelatinase B causes delayed opening of the blood-brain barrier: an expanded therapeutic window. Brain Res 1995; 703: 151–155.
35. Tangpong J, Cole MP, Sultana R, et al. Adriamycin-induced, TNF-alpha-mediated central nervous system toxicity. Neurobiol Dis 2006; 23: 127–139.
36. Qin L, Wu X, Block ML, et al. Systemic LPS causes chronic neuroinflammation and progressive neurodegeneration. Glia 2007; 55: 453–462.
37. Vadeboncoeur N, Segura M, Al-Numani D, et al. Proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine release by human brain microvascular endothelial cells stimulated by Streptococcus Suis serotype 2. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2003; 35: 49–58.
38. Banks WA, Kastin AJ, Gutierrez EG. Penetration of interleukin-6 across the blood-brain barrier. Neurosci Lett 1994; 179: 53–56.
39. McCarthy RC, Kosman DJ. Activation of C6 glioblastoma cell ceruloplasmin expression by neighboring human brain endothelia-derived interleukins in an in vitro blood-brain barrier model system. Cell Commun Signal 2014; 12: 65.
40. Shafer RA, Murphy S. Activated astrocytes induce nitric oxide synthase-2 in cerebral endothelium via tumor necrosis factor alpha. GLIA 1997; 21: 370–379.
41. Helmy A, Carpenter KL, Menon DK, et al. The cytokine responses to human traumatic brain injury: temporal profiles and evidence for cerebral parenchymal production. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011; 31: 658–670.
42. Acosta SA, Tajiri N, Shinozuka K, et al. Combination therapy of human umbilical cord blood cells and granulocyte colony stimulating factor reduces histopathological and motor impairments in an experimental model of chronic traumatic brain injury. PloS One 2014; 9: e90953.
43. Ghorbani M, Moallem S, Abnous K, et al. The effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration on carbon monoxide neurotoxicity in rats. Drug Chem Toxicol 2013; 36: 102–108.
44. Frank T, Klinker F, Falkenburger BH, et al. Pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor conveys long-term neuroprotection and improves functional outcome in a model of Parkinson's disease. Brain 2012; 135: 1914–1925.
45. Yu SC, Kuo CL, Huang CS, et al. Endogenous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a biomarker in acute ischemic stroke. Biomarkers 2012; 17: 319–324.
46. Banks WA, Dohi K, Hansen K, et al. Assessing blood granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as a potential biomarker of acute traumatic brain injury in mice and humans. Brain Behav Immun 2016; 52: 81–87.
47. Zhao LR, Navalitloha Y, Singhal S, et al. Hematopoietic growth factors pass through the blood-brain barrier in intact rats. Exp Neurol 2007; 204: 569–573.
48. Lewis M, Tartaglia LA, Lee A, et al. Cloning and expression of cDNAs for two distinct murine tumor necrosis factor receptors demonstrate one receptor is species specific. PNAS 1991; 88: 2830–2834.
49. Banks WA, Niehoff ML, Zalcman S. Permeability of the mouse blood-brain barrier to murine interleukin-2: predominance of a saturable efflux system. Brain Behav Immun 2004; 18: 434–442.
50. Erickson MA, Morofuji Y, Owen JB, et al. Rapid transport of CCL11 across the blood-brain barrier: regional variation and importance of blood cells. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2014; 349: 497–507.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: November 6, 2017
Issue published: June 2018

Keywords

  1. Neurovascular unit
  2. cytokines
  3. blood–brain barrier
  4. pericyte
  5. astrocyte

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2017.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 29106322

Authors

Affiliations

William A Banks
Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA
Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
Andrej Kovac
Institute of Neuroimmunology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
Yoichi Morofuji
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan

Notes

William A Banks, VAPSHCS, Rm 810A/Bldg 1, 1660 S. Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108, USA. Email: [email protected]

Authors’ Contributions

WAB contributed to experimental design, statistical analysis, interpretation, and writing.
AK and YM contributed to experimental execution, experimental design, interpretation, and writing.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 2202

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 65 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 67

  1. A 3D Bioprinted Human Neurovascular Unit Model of Glioblastoma Tumor G...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Blood-brain Barrier and Neurovascular Unit Dysfunction in Parkinson's ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The relationship between inflammation, impaired glymphatic system, and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Role of interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 in morphological and function...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Applications and Considerations for Microfluidic Systems To Model the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. TNF-α evokes blood-brain barrier dysfunction through activation of Rho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Quantum Dot Biomimetic for SARS-CoV-2 to Interrogate Blood–Brain Barri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. A novel 4-cell in-vitro blood-brain barrier model and its characteriza...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. The Active Role of Pericytes During Neuroinflammation in the Adult Bra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis and the CNS barriers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Neurological perspectives on aging
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Different Contacted Cell Types Contribute to Acquiring Different Prope...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. The blood–brain barrier and the neurovascular unit in subarachnoid hem...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Microglia-derived CCL2 has a prime role in neocortex neuroinflammation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Novel Antiviral Efficacy of Hedyotis diffusa and Artemisia capillaris ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Cellular loci involved in the development of brain arteriovenous malfo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. In Vitro Modeling of the Blood–Brain Barrier for the Study of Physiolo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Pericyte derived chemokines amplify neutrophil recruitment across the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Targeting Transporters for Drug Delivery to the Brain: Can We Do Bette...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Dynamic Interactions between Tumor Cells and Brain Microvascular Endot...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Gut Microbiota Interact With the Brain Through Systemic Chronic Inflam...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. The role of astrocytes in epileptic disorders
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. The Ism between Endothelial Cilia and Endothelial Nanotubules Is an Ev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Construction of a circRNA-miRNA-mRNA network revealed the potential me...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Modeling alpha-synuclein pathology in a human brain-chip to assess blo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Integrative analysis of the human brain mural cell transcriptome
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  27. CCL2 (C-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 2) Biomarker Responses in Central Ver...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette–Guérin–Infected De...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Secretome and Tunneling Nanotubes: A Multilevel Network for Long Range...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. MAP Kinase Pathways in Brain Endothelial Cells and Crosstalk with Peri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Effects of O-GlcNAcylation on functional mitochondrial transfer from a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  32. Pitavastatin Ameliorates Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Blood-Brain Barrie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Cerebral Pericytes and Endothelial Cells Communicate through Inflammas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Colony stimulating factors in the nervous system
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Biphasic roles of pentraxin 3 in cerebrovascular function after white ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Cytokines in CAR T Cell–Associated Neurotoxicity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Regulation of blood–brain barrier integrity by microglia in health and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  38. Neurocognitive impacts of arbovirus infections
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. In vitro modeling of blood–brain barrier and interface functions in ne...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydroce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Targeting Transcription Factor Nrf2 (Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Relate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Aging of the Vascular System and Neural Diseases
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. A Novel In Vitro Mouse Model to Study Mycobacterium tube...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. The Inflamed Brain in Schizophrenia: The Convergence of Genetic and En...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Can oligodendrocyte precursor cells be a therapeutic target for mitiga...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  46. Role of pericyte‐derived SENP1 in neuronal injury after brain ischemia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Oxidative Stress-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) Disruption in Neur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Acute and Persistent Alterations of Cerebellar Inflammatory Networks a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Cerebrovascular Changes and Neurodegeneration Related to Hyperlipidemi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Drug Development for Central Nervous System Diseases Using In vitro Bl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Circulating MicroRNAs and Blood-Brain-Barrier Function in Breast Cance...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Neuroinflammation and the blood–brain interface: New findings in brain...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Pericytes Suppress Brain Metastasis from Lung Cancer In Vitro
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. In Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier-Integrated Neurological Disorder Models U...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Promoting Neuro-Supportive Properties of Astrocytes with Epidermal Gro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. The year in review: progress in brain barriers and brain fluid researc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Effects of angiotensin-II on brain endothelial cell permeability via P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. The formative role of microglia in stress-induced synaptic deficits an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Potential Immunotherapeutic Targets on Myeloid Cells for Neurovascular...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Aging Neurovascular Unit and Potential Role of DNA Damage and Repair i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. The blood–brain barrier as an endocrine tissue
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Effects of lipocalin-2 on brain endothelial adhesion and permeability
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Preconditioning with partial caloric restriction confers long-term pro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  64. Cocaine Mediated Neuroinflammation: Role of Dysregulated Autophagy in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Age-Associated Changes in the Immune System and Blood–Brain Barrier Fu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Silver nanoparticle-induced expression of proteins related to oxidativ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Unique and shared inflammatory profiles of human brain endothelia and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

ISCBFM members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

ISCBFM members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.