This study investigated personality correlates of early adolescents’ tendency to either defend victims of bullying or to avoid involvement in bullying situations. Participants were 591 Dutch fifth- and sixth-grade students (X¯age = 11.42 years). Hierarchical regression models were run to predict these students’ peer-reported defender and outsider behavior by their self-reported Big Five and Reinforcement Sensitivity scores. Agreeableness (i.e., politeness) positively predicted both behaviors. Emotional stability (i.e., impulse control) positively and extraversion (i.e., dominance) negatively predicted only outsider behavior. Finally, punishment sensitivity positively and reward sensitivity negatively predicted only outsider behavior. While agreeableness seems conducive to executing provictim interventions, lacking in dominance and a strong impulse control make actively avoiding involvement in bullying situations more likely. The latter also holds for early adolescents who are afraid of punishment and unresponsive to rewards. The findings suggest that antibullying interventions aiming at promoting defending in outsiders need to take the influence of personality into account.

Atlas, R. S., Pepler, D. J. (1998). Observations of bullying in the classroom. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 86-99. doi:10.1080/00220679809597580
Google Scholar | Crossref
Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Rabasca, A., Pastorelli, C. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 645-664. doi:10.1016/S0191-8896(02)00051-X
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bollmer, J. M., Harris, M. J., Milich, R. (2006). Reactions to bullying and peer victimization: Narratives, psychological arousal, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 803-828. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.003
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bouman, T., Van der Meulen, M., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., Vermande, M. M., Aleva, L. E. (2012). Peer and self-reports of victimization and bullying: Their differential association with internalizing problems and social adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 759-774. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2012.08.004
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Perugini, M. (1993). “The Big Five Questionnaire”: A new questionnaire to measure the Five Factor Model. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 281-288. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90218-R
Google Scholar | Crossref
Carver, C. S., White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishments: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319-333. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319
Google Scholar | Crossref
Caspi, A., Bem, D. J. (1990). Personality continuity and change across the life course. In Pervin, L., John, O. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 549-575). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880-896. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.880
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., Altoè, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 93-105. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., Dekker, P. (2006). The New Participant Role Scales: A comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 343-357. doi:10.1002/ab.20133
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gray, J. A. (1981). A critique of Eysenck’s theory of personality. In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model for personality (pp. 246-276). New York, NY: Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10, 512-527. doi:10.1111/1467-9507.00178
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Adams, R., Perry, D. G., Workman, K. A., Furdella, J. Q., Egan, S. K. (2002). Agreeableness, extraversion and peer relations in early adolescence: Winning friends and deflecting aggression. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 224-251. doi:10.1006/jrpe.2002.2348
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kärnä, A., Voeten, M., Little, T. D., Poskiparta, E., Kaljonen, A., Salmivalli, C. (2011). A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program. Child Development, 82, 311-330. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01557.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Keiser, H. N., Ross, S. R. (2011). Carver and Whites’ BIS/FFFS/BAS scales and domains and facets of the Five Factor Model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 39-44. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.007
Google Scholar | Crossref
Latané, B., Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Google Scholar
Menesini, E., Camodeca, M. (2008). Shame and guilt as behaviour regulators: Relationships with bullying, victimization and prosocial behavior. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 489-506. doi:10.1348/026151007X205281
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mitchell, J. T., Kimbrel, N. A., Hundt, N. E., Cobb, A. R., Nelson-Gray, R. O., Lootens, C. M. (2007). An analysis of reinforcement sensitivity theory and the five-factor model. European Journal of Personality, 21, 869-887. doi:10.1002/per.644
Google Scholar | Crossref
Muris, P., Meesters, C., Diederen, R. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Big Five Questionnaire for Children (BFQ-C) in a Dutch sample of young adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1757-1769. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.018
Google Scholar | Crossref
O’Connell, P., Pepler, D., Craig, W. (1999). Peer involvement in bullying: Issues and challenges for intervention. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 437-452. doi:10.1006/jado.1999.0238
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Olthof, T. (2012). Anticipated feelings of guilt and shame as predictors of early adolescents’ antisocial and prosocial interpersonal behavior. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 371-388. doi:10.1080/17405629.2012.680300
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A. (2008). Bullying and the need to belong: Early adolescents’ bullying-related behavior and the acceptance they desire and receive from particular classmates. Social Development, 17, 24-46. doi:10.1011/j.1467-9507.2007.00413.x
Google Scholar | Crossref
Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Vermande, M. M., Aleva, E. A., Van der Meulen, M. (2011). Bullying as strategic behavior: Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 339-359. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.003
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Olweus, D. (2000). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In Juvonen, J., Graham, S. (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 3-20). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Paunonen, S.V. (1998). Hierarchical organization of personality and prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 538-556. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.2.538
Google Scholar | Crossref
Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Affiliative and aggressive dimensions of dominance and possible functions during early adolescence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 21-31. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00033-1
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pellegrini, A. D., Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259-280. doi:10.1348/026151002166442
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Piliavin, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S., Clark, R. D. (1981). Emergency intervention. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41, 47-65. Retrieved from ERIC database, (EJ977426)
Google Scholar | ISI
Pöyhönen, V., Juvonen, J., Salmivalli, C. (2010). What does it take to stand up for the victim of bullying? The interplay between personal and social factors. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 56, 143-163. doi:10.1353/mpq.0.0046
Google Scholar | Crossref
Pozzoli, T., Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815-827. doi:10.1007/s10802-010-939909
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Pronk, J., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., De Mey, L., Willemen, A. M. (2013). Intervention strategies in case of victimization by bullying: Social cognitions of outsiders versus defenders. Journal of School Psychology, 51, 669-682. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2013.09.002
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., Poskiparta, E. (2010). From peer putdowns to peer support: A theoretical model and how it translated into a national anti-bullying program. In Jimerson, S. R., Swearer, S. M., Espelage, D. L. (Eds.), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 441-454). New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Salmivalli, C., Lappalainen, M., Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1998). Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: A two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 205-218. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1998)
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Salmivalli, C., Peets, K. (2009). Bullies, victims, and bully-victim relationships in middle childhood and early adolescence. In Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., Laursen, B. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interaction, relationships, and groups (pp. 322-340). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behavior in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246-258. doi:10.1080/01650250344000488
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Shiner, R., Caspi, A. (2003). Personality differences in childhood and adolescence: Measurement, development and consequences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 2-32. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00101
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Slobodskaya, H. R., Kuznetsova, V. B. (2013). The role of reinforcement sensitivity in the development of childhood personality. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37, 248-256. doi:10.1177/0165025413475895
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Smits, D. J. M., Boeck, P. D. (2006). From BIS/BAS to the Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 20, 255-270. doi:10.1002/per.583
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 97-111. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tani, F., Greenman, P. S., Schneider, B. H., Fregosso, M. (2003). Bullying and the Big Five: A study of childhood personality and participant roles in bullying incidents. School Psychology International, 24, 131-146. doi:10.1177/0143034303024002001
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Torrubia, R., Ávila, C., Moltó, J., Caseras, X. (2001). The Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire (SPSRQ) as a measure of Gray’s anxiety and impulsivity dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 837-862. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00183-5
Google Scholar | Crossref
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JEA-article-ppv for $36.00