Patient and Public Involvement in Clinical Practice Guidelines: A Knowledge Synthesis of Existing Programs
Abstract
Background. The role of patient and public involvement programs (PPIPs) in developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) has generated great interest. Purpose. The authors sought to identify key components of PPIPs used in developing and implementing CPGs. Data sources. The authors searched bibliographic databases and contacted relevant organizations. Study selection. In total, 2161 articles and reports were retrieved on PPIPs in the development and implementation of CPGs. Of these, 71 qualified for inclusion in the review. Data extraction. Reviewers independently extracted data on key components of PPIPs and barriers and facilitators to their operation. Data synthesis. Over half of the studies were published after 2002, and more than half originated from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Germany. CPGs that involved patients and the public addressed a variety of health problems, especially mental health and cancer. The most frequently cited objective for using PPIPs in developing CPGs was to incorporate patients’ values or perspectives in CPG recommendations. Patients and their families and caregivers were the parties most often involved. Methods used to recruit PPIP participants included soliciting through patient/public organizations, sending invitations, and receiving referrals and recruits from clinicians. Patients and the public most often participated by taking part in a CPG working group, workshop, meeting, seminar, literature review, or consultation such as a focus group, individual interview, or survey. Patients and the public principally helped formulate recommendations and revise drafts. Limitations. The authors did not contact the authors of the studies. Conclusion. This literature review provides an extensive knowledge base for making PPIPs more effective when developing and implementing CPGs. More research is needed to assess the impact of PPIPs and resources they require.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Field MJ, Lohr KN. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
2. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318:527–30.
3. Expert Patient Task Force. The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the 21st Century. London: Department of Health; 2001.
4. O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD001431.
5. O’Connor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Flood AB. Modifying unwarranted variations in health care: shared decision making using patient decision aids. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;Suppl Variation:VAR63–72.
6. Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, Sinha L. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2006;15:9–19.
7. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1–72.
8. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA. 1999;282:1458–65.
9. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H. Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ. 1998;317:858–61.
10. Schunemann HJ, Fretheim A, Oxman AD. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006;4:22.
11. Boivin A, Légaré F, Gagnon MP. Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians’ perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13:79–84.
12. Boivin A, Green J, Nolte E, van der Meulen J, Légaré F. Considering Patients’ Preference: What Does It Mean to Clinical Practice Guideline Developers? London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; 2008.
13. Rowe G, Frewer LJ. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Human Values. 2005;30:251.
14. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B, et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:e22.
15. van der Weijden T, Légaré F, Boivin A, et al. How to integrate individual patient values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines? A research protocol. Implement Sci. 2010;5:10.
16. Burgers JS, Fervers B, Haugh M, et al. International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2000–7.
17. Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman AD. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3):CD004563.
18. Légaré F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T, Packenham C, Tapp S, Burgers J. A knowledge synthesis of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2009;4:30.
19. Gauvin F-P, Abelson J. Primer on Public Involvement. Taking the Pulse. Toronto: Health Council of Canada; 2006.
20. Légaré F, Ratté S, Gravel K, Graham ID. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals’ perceptions. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:526–35.
21. Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin FP. Bringing ‘the public’ into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. Health Policy. 2006;82:37–50.
22. Légaré F, Stacey D, Graham ID, et al. Advancing theories, models and measurement for an interprofessional approach to shared decision making in primary care: a study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:2.
23. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative Methods for Health Research. London: Sage; 2004.
24. Baumann MH, Lewis SZ, Gutterman D. ACCP evidence-based guideline development: a successful and transparent approach addressing conflict of interest, funding, and patient-centered recommendations. Chest. 2007;132:1015–24.
25. Behets FM, Rasolofomanana JR, Van Damme K, et al. Evidence-based treatment guidelines for sexually transmitted infections developed with and for female sex workers. Trop Med Int Health. 2003;8:251–8.
26. Bond CM, Watson MC, Grampian Evidence Based Community Pharmacy Guidelines Group. The development of evidence-based guidelines for over-the-counter treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis. Pharm World Sci. 2003;25:177–81.
27. de Joncheere K, Hill S, Klazinga N, Mäkela M, Oxman AD. The Clinical Guideline Programme of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence: A Review by the World Health Organization. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006.
28. Deschepper R, Vander Stichele R, Bernheim JL, et al. Communication on end-of-life decisions with patients wishing to die at home: the making of a guideline for GPs in Flanders, Belgium. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56:14–9.
29. Dijkstra RF, Niessen LW, Braspenning JC, Adang E, Grol RT. Patient-centred and professional-directed implementation strategies for diabetes guidelines: a cluster-randomized trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis. Diabetes Med. 2006;23:164–70.
30. Trefpunt Zelfhulp. Qualitative, Reliable Information for Persons with Chronic Illnesses. Antwerpen, Belgium: Domus Medica; 2008.
31. Fervers B, Bataillard A, Carretier J. Implication des patients dans l’élaboration de recommendations pour la pratique clinique: étude de la transposabilité de la méthodologie du NICE au programme Standards, Options et Recommandations en cancérologie. Paris: Fédération nationale des Centres de lutte contre le cancer; 2007.
32. World Health Organization. Global Programme on Evidence for Health Policy WHO: Guidelines for WHO guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
33. Graham K. Patient/carer involvement in clinical guidelines: the SIGN experience, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Presented at the conference of the Spanish HTA Group, November 2006, Seville, Spain.
34. Guihan M, Bosshart HT, Nelson A. Lessons learned in implementing SCI clinical practice guidelines. SCI Nursing. 2004;21:136–42.
35. Hadjistavropoulos H, Bierlein C, Sagan M, Quine A, Managing Continuity of Case Coordination Research Project Committee. Linking guidelines for case management to risk of institutionalization. Care Manag J. 2003;4:202–8.
36. Harbour H, Forsyth L, Graham K, et al. SIGN 50: A Guideline Developer’s Handbook. Edinburgh: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2008.
37. Harris C, Turner T, Mazza D, Wilkinson F. Guideline development process for the Health for Kids in the South East Project. Aust Fam Physician. 2008;37:2–5.
38. Hoes JN, Jacobs JW, Boers M, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations on the management of systemic glucocorticoid therapy in rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:1560–7.
39. Jarret L, Patient Involvement Unit. A Report on a Study to Evaluate Patient/Carer Membership of the First NICE Guideline. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2004.
40. Kelly CM, Jorm AF, Kitchener BA, Langlands RL. Development of mental health first aid guidelines for deliberate non-suicidal self-injury: a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8:62.
41. Kelly CM, Jorm AF, Kitchener BA, Langlands RL. Development of mental health first aid guidelines for suicidal ideation and behaviour: a Delphi study. BMC Psychiatry. 2008;8:17.
42. Kelson M, Bastian H, Cluzeau F, et al. Integrating Values and Preferences and Patient, Carer and Public Involvement in COPD Guidelines: The Patient at the Centre. Sheffield, UK: American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society; 2007.
43. Konety BR, Sharp VJ, Raut H, Williams RD. Screening and management of prostate cancer in elderly men: the Iowa Prostate Cancer Consensus. Urology. 2008;71:511–4.
44. Kotzeva A, Estrada M-D. Involvement of patients/carers in the development of clinical practice guidelines: CAHTA’s strategies and experience. CAHTA’s Newsletter. 2008:15–7.
45. Landier W, Bhatia S, Eshelman DA, et al. Development of risk-based guidelines for pediatric cancer survivors: the Children’s Oncology Group long-term follow-up guidelines from the Children’s Oncology Group Late Effects Committee and Nursing Discipline. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4979–90.
46. Landsman GH. What evidence, whose evidence? Physical therapy in New York State’s clinical practice guideline and in the lives of mothers of disabled children. Soc Sci Med. 2006;11. Available from: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clcmr/articles/CMR-11862/frame.html
47. Love P, Maunder EMW, Green JM. Are South African women willing and able to apply the new Food-Based Dietary Guidelines? Lessons for nutrition educators. South Afr J Clin Nutr. 2008;21:17–24.
48. Luboldt HJ, Fornara P, Weissbach L, Wirth M, Lorenz W, Rubben H. Systematic development of a guideline for early detection of prostate cancer: the German way in the evidence gap. Eur Urol. 2004;46:725–30.
49. Maputle MS, Jali MN. Dealing with diversity: incorporating cultural sensitivity into midwifery practice in the tertiary hospital of Capricorn District, Limpopo Province. Curationis. 2006;29:61–9.
50. Marshall C, Ollenschläger G, Sänger S. Consumer involvement on guideline development. Paper presented at the Symposium of the Guidelines International Network, 11-14 October 2005, Budapest, Hungary.
51. Murie J, Ross A, Lough M, Rich D. Exploring post-myocardial infarction patients’ perceptions of patient-mediated interventions for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease (SIGN Guideline 41). Qual Primary Care. 2006;14:77–83.
52. Murray S, Tredoux S, Viljoen L, Herselman MG, Marais D. Consumer testing of the preliminary Paediatric Food-Based Dietary Guidelines (PFBDG) among mothers with infants younger than 6 months in selected urban and rural areas in the Western Cape. South Afr J Clin Nutr. 2008;21:34–8.
53. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. A Guide for Patients and Carers: Contributing to a NICE Clinical Guideline. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2006.
54. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. The Guidelines Manual. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2007.
55. New Zealand Guidelines Group. Evaluation Survey of Consumers Involved in Guidelines. Wellington: New Zealand Guidelines Group; 2003.
56. New Zealand Guidelines Group. Consumer Health Policy. Wellington: New Zealand Guidelines Group; 2009. Available from: http://www.nzgg.org.nz/index.cfm?fuseaction=about&fusesubaction=article&documentid=9&articleid=27
57. Phelan K, Donovan E, Kotagal U, Doyne E, Reeves S. Clinical practice guidelines for hospitalist text: Clinical guidelines. In: Zaoutis LB, Chiang VW eds. Comprehensive Pediatric Hospital Medicine. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2004. p 36–43.
58. Pijnenborg L, van Veenendaal H. Patient involvement. Paper presented at the conferences of Guidelines International Network, 14-15 November 2003, Edinburgh, Scotland.
59. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists Clinical Practice Guidelines Team for Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia. Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2003;37:641–56.
60. Sänger S, Ollenschläger G. Patient Information and Patient Participation at the German Agency for Quality Patient in Medicine. Berlin: German Agency for Quality Patient in Medicine; 2008.
61. Sänger S, Noelle G, Huth A, et al. Autonomous, resourceful and involved: the role of the German Patient Forum in the critical appraisal of patient guidelines on the Internet. Paper presented at the conferences of the Guidelines International Network, 1-3 November 2004, Wellington, New Zealand.
62. Sänger S, Lelgemann M, Ollenschläger G. Evidence-based patient guidelines: more than a simple translation on the expert language into a consumer language. Paper presented at conference of the Guidelines International Network, 5-7 December 2005, Lyon, France.
63. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. A Handbook for Patient and Carers Representatives. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network; 2008.
64. Southern Health. Involving Consumers in Caring for Children at Southern Health: Working Together for Our Kids. Victoria: Victorian Department of Human Services Hospital Admission Risk Program; 2008.
65. Suppes T, Dennehy EB, Hirschfeld RMA, et al. The Texas implementation of medication algorithms: update to the algorithms for treatment of bipolar I disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2005;66:870–86.
66. Thomas V. Involving patients and carers in developing guidelines: an evaluation. Paper presented at the conference of the Guidelines International Network, 1-3 October 2008, Helsinki, Finland.
67. Tunner TP, Salzer MS. Consumer perspectives on quality of care in the treatment of schizophrenia. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006;33:674–81.
68. van Veenendaal H. Patient involvement in guideline development. Paper presented at the workshop of Strategies for Development and Implementation of guidelines, 15 November 2005, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
69. van Vuuren J, Versluijs M, van Veenendaal H. Patient involvement. Paper presented at the conferences of ISQUA, 22 October 2004, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
70. World Health Organization. WHO Handbook for Guideline Development. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2008.
71. Yardley L, Beyer N, Hauer K, McKee K, Ballinger C, Todd C. Recommendations for promoting the engagement of older people in activities to prevent falls. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007;16:230–4.
72. Zuckerbrot RA, Cheung AH, Jensen PS, et al. Guidelines for adolescent depression in primary care (GLAD-PC): I. Identification, assessment, and initial management. Pediatrics. 2007;120:e1299–312.
73. Braun KL, Kuhaulua RL, Ichiho HM, Aitaoto NT. Listening to the community: a first step in adapting Diabetes Today to the Pacific. Pac Health Dialog. 2002;9:321–8.
74. Friedman NM, Gleeson JM, Kent MJ, Foris M, Rodriguez DJ, Cypress M. Management of diabetes mellitus in the Lovelace Health Systems’ EPISODES OF CARE program. Eff Clin Pract. 1998;1:5–11.
75. Lanza ML, Ericsson A. Consumer contributions in developing clinical practice guidelines. J Nurs Care Qual. 2000;14:33–40.
76. McConnell JD, Barry MJ, Bruskewitz RC, et al. Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Diagnosis and Treatment. Clinical Practice Guideline. No. 8. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research; 1994.
77. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines on chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002;39:S17–31.
78. Rischer JB, Childress SB. Cancer pain management: pilot implementation of the AHCPR guideline in Utah. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1996;22:683–700.
79. Rymer MM, Summers D, Soper P. Development of clinical pathways for stroke management: an example from Saint Luke’s Hospital, Kansas City. Clin Geriatr Med. 1999;15:741–64.
80. Scherer MJ, Cushman LA. Determining the content for an interactive training programme and interpretive guidelines for the Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:126–30.
81. Schulberg HC, Katon W, Simon GE, Rush AJ. Treating major depression in primary care practice: an update of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Practice Guidelines. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55:1121–7.
82. Shoultz J, Phillion N, Noone J, Tanner B. Listening to women: culturally tailoring the violence prevention guidelines from the put prevention into practice program. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2002;14:307–15.
83. Shoultz J, Tanner B, Harrigan R. Culturally appropriate guidelines for alcohol and drug abuse prevention. Nurse Pract. 2000;25:50–6.
84. Steward D. Utility assessment based on individualized patient perspectives. Paper presented at the Spring Symposium on Interactive and Mixed-Initiative Decision-Theoretic Systems, AAAI, 23-25 March 1998, Stanford, CA.
85. Duff LA, Kelson M, Marriott S, et al. Clinical guidelines: involving patients and users of services. J Clin Effectiveness. 1996;1:104–12.
86. Kelson M. The National Guidelines and Audit Patient Involvement Unit. J Clin Excel. 2002;4:194–5.
87. Pell I, Dowie J, Clarke A, Kennedy A, Bhavnani V. Development and preliminary evaluation of a clinical guidance programme for the decision about prophylactic oophorectomy in women undergoing a hysterectomy. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:32–8; discussion 8–9.
88. van Wersch A, Eccles M. Involvement of consumers in the development of evidence based clinical guidelines: practical experiences from the North of England evidence based guideline development programme. Qual Health Care. 2001;10:10–6.
89. Egger G, Donovan RJ, Giles-Corti B, Bull F, Swinburn B. Developing national physical activity guidelines for Australians. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2001;25:561–3.
90. Schofield MJ, Sanson-Fisher R. How to prepare cancer patients for potentially threatening medical procedures: consensus guidelines. NSW Cancer Council Cancer Education Research Program. J Cancer Educ. 1996;11:153–8.
91. Wilson EJ, Nasrin D, Banwell C, Broom D, Douglas RM. Realities of practice: engaging parents and GPs in developing clinical practice guidelines. Aust Fam Physician. 2000;29:498–503.
92. Collège des Médecins du Québec. Dépistage du cancer de la prostate: utilisation de l’APS. Montréal: Direction de l’amélioration de l’exercice en collaboration avec le Service des communications, Collège des médecins du Québec; 1998.
93. Southern African Hypertension Society Executive Committee. Hypertension clinical guideline 2001. S Afr Med J. 2001;91:163–72.
94. Women’s Health Action. Guidelines for the Involvement of Consumers within the Health Sector. Newmarket: Women’s Health Action Trust; 2000.
95. Abelson J, Eyles J, McLeod CB, Collins P, McMullan C, Forest PG. Does deliberation make a difference? Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting. Health Policy. 2003;66:95–106.
96. Martin GP. Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:1757–65.
97. Rawlins MD, Culyer AJ. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments. BMJ. 2004;329:224–7.
98. Lehoux P, Daudelin G, Demers-Payette O, Boivin A. Fostering deliberations about health innovation: what do we want to know from publics? Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:2002–9.
99. Boivin A, Légaré F, Lehoux P. Decision technologies as normative instruments: exposing the values within. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:426–30.
100. Moreira T. Diversity in clinical guidelines: the role of repertoires of evaluation. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:1975–85.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: September 29, 2011
Issue published: November/December 2011
Keywords
History
Manuscript received: November 24, 2010
Manuscript accepted: December 8, 2010
Published online: September 29, 2011
Issue published: November/December 2011
PubMed: 21959267
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Article usage*
Total views and downloads: 1279
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Articles citing this one
Web of Science: 107 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 116
- Hype, evidence gaps and digital divides: Telehealth blind spots in rur...
- Erwartungen der Leitlinienentwickler*innen an „living guidelines“
- Patient preferences in the treatment of chronic musculoskeletal pain: ...
- Methods for living guidelines: early guidance based on practical exper...
- Richtlijnen als hulpmiddel bij de verbetering van de zorg
- Enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection ...
- Demands on Health Information and Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pat...
- Standard set of network outcomes for traumatic spinal cord injury: a c...
- Protocol of an iterative qualitative study to develop a molecular test...
- Guideline development in harm reduction: Considerations around the mea...
- Patient and public involvement in the development of clinical practice...
- Patient representatives need various methods to be involved in clinica...
- Broadening the diversity of consumers engaged in guidelines: a scoping...
- PROTOCOL: Barriers and facilitators to stakeholder engagement in healt...
- Patient and public involvement in the build‐up of COVID‐19 testing in ...
- The patient engagement evaluation tool was valid for clinical practice...
- Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in ...
- Patients’ participation in government-sponsored guidelines in Latin Am...
- An exploration of the perspectives of individuals and their caregivers...
- Clinical Practice Guidelines on Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Dise...
- Introducing the Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR) Evidence...
- Values, principles, strategies, and frameworks underlying patient and ...
- A few panel members dominated guideline development meeting discussion...
- Exploring the theory, barriers and enablers for patient and public inv...
- Patient representatives: Crucial members of health‐care working groups...
- Online Modified-Delphi: a Potential Method for Continuous Patient Enga...
- Exploring approaches to identify, incorporate and report patient prefe...
- Evaluating the Acceptability, Feasibility, and Outcomes of Two Methods...
- Patients’ engagement in primary care research: a case study in a Canad...
- Context Factors Facilitating and Hindering Patient Participation in Di...
- How do guideline developers identify, incorporate and report patient p...
- Researchers, patients, and other stakeholders’ perspectives on challen...
- Patient and public involvement in the development of clinical practice...
- How to identify, incorporate and report patient preferences in clinica...
- Collaborating with individuals with lived experience to adapt ...
- Development of a guideline for the treatment of generalized anxiety di...
- 20th Anniversary Update of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework Part ...
- Patient engagement in clinical guidelines development: input from > 10...
- Clinical Practice Guidelines as a Tool for Improving Patient Care
- Involving People with Learning Disabilities in Guideline Development
- Participation and consultation engagement strategies have complementar...
- Practical Considerations in Using Online Modified-Delphi Approaches to...
- Patient and Family Participation in Clinical Guidelines Development: T...
- Training curriculum to help patient representatives participate meanin...
- Engaging children and families in pediatric Health Research: a scoping...
- GRADE-Leitlinien zu Gerechtigkeit 2. Berücksichtigung der Gerechtigkei...
- A taxonomy of impacts on clinical and translational research from comm...
- Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: The protocol for...
- Patient Engagement and Multidisciplinary Involvement Has an Impact on ...
- Family physicians’ experience and understanding of evidence-based prac...
- Patient and caregiver involvement in the formulation of guideline ques...
- Barriers to antiretroviral therapy adherence in developed countries: a...
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease guidelines in Europe: a look int...
- Impact of patient involvement on clinical practice guideline developme...
- Appraising the quality standard underpinning international clinical pr...
- Applying a community-based participatory research framework to patient...
- An Overview of Systematic Reviews to Inform the Institutional Design o...
- Unzureichende Patientenbeteiligung an der Leitlinienentwicklung in Deu...
- Barriers to Transferring Auditing Research to Standard Setters
- Recommendations for patient engagement in patient-oriented emergency m...
- Material practices for meaningful engagement: An analysis of participa...
- Towards high-quality, useful practice guidelines for child and youth m...
- Prioritizing research topics: a comparison of crowdsourcing and patien...
- Shared agenda making for quality improvement; towards more synergy in ...
- Understanding optimal approaches to patient and caregiver engagement i...
- Patient involvement in guidelines is poor five years after institute o...
- GRADE equity guidelines 2: considering health equity in GRADE guidelin...
- Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Healthcare Guidan...
- Recommendations for patient engagement in guideline development panels...
- Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Framework for enhancing clinical practice guidelines through continuou...
- When to invest in clinical guidelines for children? A practice oriente...
- Patients as Collaborative Partners in Clinical Research to Inform HTA
- Barriers to Transferring Accounting and Auditing Research to Standard ...
- More primary care patients regret health decisions if they experienced...
- User involvement in the implementation of clinical guidelines for comm...
- End-user involvement in a systematic review of quantitative and qualit...
- Dissemination of Clinical Practice Guidelines...
- Added value of involving patients in the first step of multidisciplina...
- Three Conceptual Models of Patient and Public Involvement in Standard-...
- Monitoring and evaluation of patient involvement in clinical practice ...
- Voorwaarden voor succesvolle betrokkenheid van patiënten/cliënten bij ...
- Is Shared Decision Making a Utopian Dream or an Achievable Goal?
- Characterizing patient-oriented tools that could be packaged with guid...
- Strategies for disseminating recommendations or guidelines to patients...
- Review and evaluation of the methodological quality of the existing gu...
- Improving Decision making On Location of Care with the frail Elderly a...
- An empirical study of patient participation in guideline development: ...
- Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review a...
- Including citizens in institutional reviews: expectations and experien...
- Case Study: Community Engagement and Clinical Trial Success: Outreach ...
- Guidelines for clinical use of CBCT: a review
- Patient and public attitudes to and awareness of clinical practice gui...
- Evaluation of the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of two ...
- Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a...
- The use of research evidence on patient preferences in pharmaceutical ...
- Patient engagement in research: a systematic review
- Facilitators and Barriers to Service User Involvement in Mental Health...
- What Do Patients Want? Patient Preference in Wound Care
- Narrowing the gap between organisational demands and the quest for pat...
- What Are the Key Ingredients for Effective Public Involvement in Healt...
- Bridging the gap between what is known and what we do in renal medicin...
- A Framework for Crafting Clinical Practice Guidelines that are Relevan...
- Patient Involvement in Health Care Decision Making: A Review
- Methoden des Einbezugs von Patientenvertretern bei der Entwicklung von...
- Patiëntenparticipatie in richtlijnontwikkeling
- The process of developing evidence-based guidance in medicine and publ...
- How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared d...
- Assigning value to medical algorithms: implications for personalized m...
- Clinical practice guidelines as a tool for improving patient care
- Evidence base in guideline generation in diabetes
- Clinical practice guidelines
- INVOLVEMENT OF CONSUMERS IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT ACTIVITIES BY...
- Involving patients in HTA activities at local level: a study protocol ...
- Integrating guideline development and implementation: analysis of guid...
- Developing clinical practice guidelines: target audiences, identifying...
- Feasibility of a Wiki as a Participatory Tool for Patients in Clinical...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
SMDM members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
SMDM members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
