![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
As the complexity of health decision science applications increases, high-level programming languages are increasingly adopted for statistical analyses and numerical computations. These programming languages facilitate sophisticated modeling, model documentation, and analysis reproducibility. Among the high-level programming languages, the statistical programming framework R is gaining increased recognition. R is freely available, cross-platform compatible, and open source. A large community of users who have generated an extensive collection of well-documented packages and functions supports it. These functions facilitate applications of health decision science methodology as well as the visualization and communication of results. Although R’s popularity is increasing among health decision scientists, methodological extensions of R in the field of decision analysis remain isolated. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of existing R functionality that is applicable to the various stages of decision analysis, including model design, input parameter estimation, and analysis of model outputs.
References
| 1. |
Tosh, J, Wailoo, A. Review of Software for Decision Modelling. Sheffield, UK: Decision Support Unit, University of Sheffield; 2008. Google Scholar |
| 2. |
Williams, C, Lewsey, JD, Briggs, AH, Mackay, DF. Cost-effectiveness analysis in R using a multi-state modelling survival analysis framework: a tutorial. Med Decis Making. In press. Google Scholar |
| 3. |
Hawkins, N, Sculpher, M, Epstein, D. Cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for chronic disease: using R to incorporate time dependency of treatment response. Med Decis Making. 2005;25(5):511–9. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 4. |
Eddy, DM, Hollingworth, W, Caro, JJ. Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):733–43. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 5. |
Briggs, AH, Weinstein, MC, Fenwick, EA. Model parameter estimation and uncertainty analysis: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force Working Group-6. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):722–32. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 6. |
Pitman, R, Fisman, D, Zaric, GS. Dynamic transmission modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force Working Group-5. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):712–21. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 7. |
Karnon, J, Stahl, J, Brennan, A, Caro, JJ, Mar, J, Moller, J. Modeling using discrete event simulation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-4. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):701–11. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
| 8. |
Siebert, U, Alagoz, O, Bayoumi, AM. State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-3. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):690–700. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 9. |
Roberts, M, Russell, LB, Paltiel, AD. Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-2. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):678–89. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 10. |
Caro, JJ, Briggs, AH, Siebert, U, Kuntz, KM, Force I-SMGRPT . Modeling good research practices—overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):667–77. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 11. |
Beck, JR, Pauker, SG. The Markov process in medical prognosis. Med Decis Making. 1983;3(4):419–58. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 12. |
Iskandar, R, Alarid-Escudero, F, Kuntz, KM. Does Size Matter? A Method for Adaptively Determining Cycle Length in a State-Transition Model. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making; St. Louis, MO; 18–21 October 2015. Google Scholar |
| 13. |
Shechter, SM, Bailey, MD, Schaefer, AJ, Roberts, MS. The optimal time to initiate HIV therapy under ordered health states. Oper Res. 2008;56(1):20–33. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
| 14. |
Wilensky, U . NetLogo: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University; 1999 Available from: URL: http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Google Scholar |
| 15. |
Latimer, NR . Survival analysis for economic evaluations alongside clinical trials—extrapolation with patient-level data: inconsistencies, limitations, and a practical guide. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(6):743–54. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 16. |
Welton, NJ, Sutton, AJ, Cooper, N, Abrams, KR, Ades, AE. Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making in Healthcare. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2012. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 17. |
Burchard, EG, Oh, SS, Foreman, MG, Celedon, JC. Moving toward true inclusion of racial/ethnic minorities in federally funded studies: a key step for achieving respiratory health equality in the United States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191(5):514–21. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
| 18. |
Ades, AE, Caldwell, DM, Reken, S, Welton, NJ, Sutton, AJ, Dias, S. Evidence synthesis for decision making 7: a reviewer’s checklist. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(5):679–91. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 19. |
Dias, S, Sutton, AJ, Ades, AE, Welton, NJ. Evidence synthesis for decision making 2: a generalized linear modeling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(5):607–17. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 20. |
Dias, S, Sutton, AJ, Welton, NJ, Ades, AE. Evidence synthesis for decision making 6: embedding evidence synthesis in probabilistic cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(5):671–8. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 21. |
Dias, S, Sutton, AJ, Welton, NJ, Ades, AE. Evidence synthesis for decision making 3: heterogeneity-subgroups, meta-regression, bias, and bias-adjustment. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(5):618–40. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
| 22. |
Dias, S, Welton, NJ, Sutton, AJ, Ades, AE. Evidence synthesis for decision making 5: the baseline natural history model. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(5):657–70. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 23. |
Dias, S, Welton, NJ, Sutton, AJ, Ades, AE. Evidence synthesis for decision making 1: introduction. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(5):597–606. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 24. |
Dias, S, Welton, NJ, Sutton, AJ, Caldwell, DM, Lu, G, Ades, AE. Evidence synthesis for decision making 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomized controlled trials. Med Decis Making. 2013;33(5):641–56. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 25. |
Shkolnikov, VM, Sobotka, T. Human Fertility Database: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany) and Vienna Institute of Demography (Austria). Available from: URL: www.humanfertility.org. Google Scholar |
| 26. |
Shkolnikov, V, Barbieri, M, Wilmoth, J. The Human Mortaliy Database: University of California, Berkeley (USA), and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany). Available from: URL: http://www.mortality.org/. Google Scholar |
| 27. |
National Institutes of Health . Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program populations 1969-2014. Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch. Google Scholar |
| 28. |
Booth, H, Hyndman, R, Tickle, L, de Jong, P. Lee-Carter mortality forecasting: a multi-country comparison of variants and extensions. Demographic Research. 2006;15(9):289–310. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 29. |
Goldhaber-Fiebert, JD, Brandeau, ML. Modeling and calibration for exposure to time-varying, modifiable risk factors: the example of smoking behavior in India. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(2):196–210. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
| 30. |
Taylor, DC, Pawar, V, Kruzikas, DT, Gilmore, KE, Sanon, M, Weinstein, MC. Incorporating calibrated model parameters into sensitivity analyses: deterministic and probabilistic approaches. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012;30(2):119–26. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 31. |
Chia, YL, Salzman, P, Plevritis, SK, Glynn, PW. Simulation-based parameter estimation for complex models: a breast cancer natural history modelling illustration. Stat Methods Med Res. 2004;13(6):507–24. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
| 32. |
Kim, JJ, Kuntz, KM, Stout, NK. Multiparameter calibration of a natural history model of cervical cancer. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(2):137–50. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 33. |
Taylor, DC, Pawar, V, Kruzikas, D. Methods of model calibration: observations from a mathematical model of cervical cancer. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(11):995–1000. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 34. |
Stout, NK, Knudsen, AB, Kong, CY, McMahon, PM, Gazelle, GS. Calibration methods used in cancer simulation models and suggested reporting guidelines. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(7):533–45. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
| 35. |
Goldhaber-Fiebert, JD, Jalal, HJ. Some health states are better than others: using health state rank order to improve probabilistic analyses. Med Decis Making. 2016;36(8):927–40. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
| 36. |
Strong, M, Oakley, JE, Brennan, A, Breeze, P. Estimating the expected value of sample information using the probabilistic sensitivity analysis sample: a fast, nonparametric regression-based method. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(5):570–83. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 37. |
Jalal, H, Goldhaber-Fiebert, JD, Kuntz, KM. Computing expected value of partial sample information from probabilistic sensitivity analysis using linear regression metamodeling. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(5):584–95. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
| 38. |
Brennan, A, Kharroubi, SA. Efficient computation of partial expected value of sample information using Bayesian approximation. J Health Econ. 2007;26(1):122–48. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
