![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
With the increasing prevalence of group work in marketing courses there is a need to consider the impact of students’ social dynamics on both learning and satisfaction outcomes. This article explores one such dynamic at both intra- and intergroup levels. Using data generated from multiple sources, it was identified that students who are actively contributing to group processes have difficulty distinguishing between students, and indeed groups, that are socially loafing and those that are genuinely struggling with the material. As a consequence, the struggling students are subject to incidences of socially destructive behaviors, critically harming their ability to develop. This has the potential to harm not only the individual struggling student and their group but also burden the other members of the class with a class member that will never be able to meaningfully contribute. Using social interdependence theory, a framework is proposed to explain how this confusion among contributing students arises. Recommendations are made regarding how to design curriculum so as to minimize the incidence of this phenomenon as well as intervention strategies to mitigate its effect should it present.
Keywords project, social, loafing, struggling, reflexive
|
Agar, M. ( 1980). Hermeneutics in anthropology: A review essay. Ethos, 8, 253-272. Google Scholar | |
|
Aggarwal, P. , & O’Brien, C.L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effects on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 255-264. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Belk, R. , Wallendorf, M. , & Sherry, J. ( 1989). The sacred and the profane in consumer behavior: Theodicy on the odyssey. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 1-39. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Bettenhausen, K.L. ( 1991). Five years of group research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345-381. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Bourner, J. , Hughes, M. , & Bourner, T. ( 2001). First-year undergraduate experiences of group project work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26, 19-39. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Boyatzis, R. ( 1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
|
Boyer, E.G. , Weiner, J.L. , & Diamond, M.P. ( 1985). Why groups? Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9(4), 3-7. Google Scholar | |
|
Brandyberry, A. , & Bakke, S. ( 2006). Mitigating negative behaviors in student project teams: An information technology solution. Journal of Information Systems Education, 17, 195-209. Google Scholar | |
|
Braun, V. , & Clarke, V. ( 2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bruffee, K. ( 1995). Sharing our toys: Cooperative learning versus collaborative learning. Change, 27, 12-18. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Cheng, R. , Lam, S. , & Chan, J. ( 2008). When high achievers and low achievers work in the same group: The roles of group heterogeneity and processes in project-based learning . British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 205-221. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Colbeck, C.L. , Campbell, S. , & Bjorkland, S. ( 2000). Grouping in the dark: What college students learn from group projects? Journal of Higher Education, 71, 60-83. Google Scholar | |
|
Creswell, J. ( 2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing amongst five approaches (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
|
Cuseo, J. ( 2000). Collaborative and cooperative learning: Pedagogy for promoting new-student retention and achievement. Preconference workshop delivered at the 19th Annual Conference on The First-Year Experience, Columbia, SC. Google Scholar | |
|
Davis, S. , & Franklin, S. ( 2004, August). Assessing the impact of student learning style preferences. Paper presented at the Physics Education Research Conference (Part of the PER Conference Series), Madison, WI. Google Scholar | |
|
Deutsch, M. ( 1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129-152. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Deutsch, M. ( 1962). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 275-319). Lincoln: Nebraska Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Dewey, J. ( 1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan. Google Scholar | |
|
Dolnicar, S. , & Stern, D. ( 2003). What do Australian practitioners expect from marketing graduates? Paper presented at the ANZMAC Conference , Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Google Scholar | |
|
Dommeyer, C. ( 2007). Using the diary method to deal with social loafers on the group project: Its effects on peer evaluations, group behavior, and attitudes . Journal of Marketing Education, 29, 175-188. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
DuFour, R. ( 2004). What is a professional learning community? Educational Leadership, 61 (8), 6-11. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Falchikov, N. ( 1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self-assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11, 146-165. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Falchikov, N. , & Magin, D. ( 1997). Detecting gender bias in peer marking of students’ group process work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 385-396. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Flyvberg, B. ( 2004). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. In C. Seale , G. Gobo , J. Gubrium , & D. Silverman (Eds.). Qualitative research practice D (pp. 420-434). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
|
Fox, N.J. ( 2003). Practice-based evidence. Sociology, 37, 81-102. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Garvin, J. , Butcher, A. , Stephani, A. , Tariq, V. , Lewis, N. , Blumson, R. , . . . Hill, J. ( 1995). Group projects for first-year university students: An evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 20, 273-288. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Goldfinch, J. , & Raeside, R. ( 1990). Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15, 210-225. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Graham, R. , Graham, B. , & Whiting, V. ( 1997). Cooperative learning: The benefits of participatory examinations in principles of marketing classes. Journal of Education for Business, 72, 149-152. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hendry, G. , Heinrich, P. , Lyon, P. , Barratt, A. , Simpson, J. , Hyde, S. , . . . Mgaieth, S. ( 2005). Helping students understand their learning styles: Effects on study self-efficacy, preference for group work, and group climate. Educational Psychology, 25, 395-407. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hunsaker, P.L. ( 2004). Learning to manage intergroup dynamics in changing task environments: An experiential exercise. Journal of Management Education, 28, 790-806. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Jacques, D. ( 1984) Learning in groups. London, England: Croom Haley. Google Scholar | |
|
Johnson, D. ( 1970). Social psychology of education. New York, NY: Holt. Google Scholar | |
|
Johnson D. , & Johnson, R. ( 1985). The internal dynamics of cooperative learning groups . In R. Slavin , S. Sharan , S. Kagan , R. Herzz-Laazarowitz , C. Webb , & R. Schmuck (Eds.), Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (pp. 103-125). New York, NY: Plenum press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Johnson, D. , & Johnson, R. ( 1987). Research shows the benefits of adult cooperation. Educational Leadership, 45(3), 27-30. Google Scholar | |
|
Johnson, D. , & Johnson, R. ( 2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic , Social and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 285-358. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Johnson, D. , Johnson, R. , & Smith, K. ( 1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing faculty instructional productivity (HSHC-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4). Washington, DC: George Washington University School of Education and Human Development. Google Scholar | |
|
Johnson, D. , Johnson, R. , & Smith, K. ( 1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26-35. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Johnson, D. , Johnson, R. , & Smith, K. ( 2007). The state of cooperative learning in post secondary and professional settings. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 15-29. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kane, J. , & Lawler, E. ( 1978). Methods of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 555-586. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Karns, G.L. ( 2006). Learning style differences in the perceived effectiveness of learning activities. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 56-63. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Kleef, G. , Dijk, E. , Steinel, W. , Harinck, F. , & Beest, I.V. ( 2008). Anger in social conflict: Cross-situational comparisons and suggestions for the future. Group Decision and Negotiation , 17, 13-30. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| La Hay, L. , & Mendoza, A. ( 1995). The multicultural learning group: Shaking up cultural myths. College Teaching, 43, 36-41. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lejk, M. , Wyvill, M. , & Farrow, S. ( 1999). Group learning in systems analysis and design: A comparison of the performance of streamed and mixed ability groups. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 5-14. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
MacGregor, J. , Cooper, J. , Smith, K. , & Robinson, P. (Eds.). (2000). Strategies for energizing large classes: From small groups to learning communities: New directions for teaching and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar | |
|
McLean, C. , Reid, C. , & Scharf, F. ( 1999). The development of transferable skills in business studies degrees. Irish Business and Administration Research, 19/20, 47-64. Google Scholar | |
|
Nunamaker, J.F., Jr. , Reinig, B.A. , & Briggs , R.O. (2009). Principles for effective virtual teamwork. Communications of the ACM, 52, 113-117. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
O’Sullivan, T. , Rice, J. , Rogerson, S. , & Saunders, C. ( 1996). Successful group work. London, England: Kogan Page. Google Scholar | |
|
Panitz, T. ( 1996). A definition of collaborative vs. cooperative learning . Retrieved from http://www.lgu.ac.uk/deliberations/collab.learning/panitz2.html Google Scholar | |
|
Parsons, D. , & Drew, S. ( 1996). Designing group project work to enhance learning: Key elements. Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 65-80. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Payne, B. , & Monk-Turner, E. , (2006). Students perceptions of group projects: The role of race, age and slacking. College Student Journal, 40, 132-139. Google Scholar | |
|
Perry, C. ( 1998). Processes of a case study methodology for post graduate research in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 32, 785-802. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Pfaff, E. , & Huddleston, P. (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 37-45. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Rockwood, R. ( 1995). National Teaching and Learning Forum, 4(6), Part 1. Google Scholar | |
|
Rosser, S. ( 1998). Group work in science, mathematics and engineering. College Teaching, 43(6), 82-91. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Rundle-Thiele, S. , Bennett, R. , & Dann, S. ( 2005). The successful preparation and development of future marketing professionals: A recommended methodological framework. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 7, 27-35. Google Scholar | |
|
Slavin, R. ( 1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement ? Psychological Bulletin, 93, 429-445. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Smith, B. , & MacGregor, J. ( 1992). What is collaborative learning? In A. Goodsell , M. Maher , V. Tinto , B. Smith , & J. MacGregor (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (pp. 9-22). University Park: National Center on Postsecondary Teaching, Learning, and Assessment at Pennsylvania State University. Google Scholar | |
|
Smith, K. , Sheppard, S. , Johnson, D. , & Johnson, R. ( 2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 1-15. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Spiggle, S. ( 1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 491-504. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Strong, J. , & Anderson, R. ( 1990). Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 12(2), 61-67. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Tellis, W. ( 1997). Introduction to case study. Qualitative Report, 3(2). Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR3-2/tellis1.html Google Scholar | |
|
Tobin, G. , & Begley, C. ( 2004). Methodological rigor within a qualitative framework. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48, 388-396. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Williams, K. , Harkins, S. , & Latane, B. ( 1981). Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 40, 303-311. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wood, C.M. ( 2003). The effects of creating psychological ownership among students in group projects. Journal of Marketing Education , 25, 241-249. Google Scholar | |
|
Yin, R. ( 2003). Applications of case study research (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
|
Yin, R. ( 2008). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). London, England: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
|
Young, L.C. , & Freeman, L.M. ( 2008). A case for contrast as a catalyst for change. International Journal of Learning, 15, 295-303. Google Scholar |
