![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Teaching retailing principles to students is a challenge because although real-world wholesale and retail decision making very heavily depends on dynamic conditions, classroom exercises are limited to abstract discussions and role-playing. This article describes two interlocking class projects taught using the virtual reality of secondlife.com, which allowed students to use their recently gained skills in wholesaling and retailing. The exercises provided students with unique educational experiences without the need of “bricks and mortar” product development, wholesale, or retail spaces. This spurred students’ creativity and entrepreneurship. Students described the simulations as “fun” and “interesting.” Students also reported a greater depth of learning as a result of participating in the virtual simulation. This article describes the interdisciplinary team efforts to develop educational experiences for students. It also uses previous research in virtual reality implementation for classroom use to provide a framework for assessing the credibility of the set of assignments.
References
Section:
|
Alexander, P. M. (2006). Virtual teamwork in very large undergraduate classes. Computers & Education, 47, 127-147. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Antonietti, A., Cantoia, M. (2000). To see a painting versus to walk in a painting: An experiment on sense-making through virtual reality. Computers & Education, 34, 213-223. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Baker, S., Wentz, R., Woods, M. (2009). Using virtual worlds in education: Second Life® as an educational tool. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 59-64. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Borin, N., Metcalf, L., Tietje, B. (2007). A replicable, zero-based model for marketing curriculum innovation. Journal of Marketing Education, 29, 164-174. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Calongne, C. (2008, September/October). Educational frontiers: Learning in a virtual world. Educause Review, 43(5). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume43/EducationalFrontiersLearningin/163163 Google Scholar | |
|
Chou, S.-W., Liu, C.-H. (2005). Learning effectiveness in a Web-based virtual learning environment: A learner control perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 65-76. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Cronin, J. J. (2009). Upgrading to Web 2.0: An experiential project to build a marketing Wiki. Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 66-75. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Dacko, S. (2001). Narrowing skill development gaps in marketing and MBA programs: The role of innovative technologies for distance learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 228-239. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of SecondDMI. Computers & Education, 52, 220-233. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Diamond, N., Koernig, S. K., Iqbal, Z. (2008). Uniting active and deep learning to teach problem-solving skills: Strategic tools and the learning spiral. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 116-129. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Gaimster, J. (2008). Reflections on interactions in virtual worlds and their implication for learning art and design. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 6, 187-199. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Girvan, C., Savage, T. (2010). Identifying an appropriate pedagogy for virtual worlds: A Communal Constructivism case study. Computers & Education, 55, 342-349. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Granitz, N., Hugstad, P. (2004). Creating and diffusing a technology champion course. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 208-225. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Hansen, D. (2008). Knowledge transfer in online learning environments. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 93-105. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Hauptman, H. (2010). Enhancement of spatial thinking with Virtual Spaces 1.0. Computers & Education, 54, 123-135. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hu, H. (2009). An international virtual team based project at undergraduate level: Design and assessment. Marketing Education Review, 19(1), 17-22. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Jarmon, L., Traphagan, T., Mayrath, M., Trivedi, A. (2009). Virtual world teaching, experiential learning, and assessment: An inter-disciplinary communication course in Second Life. Computers & Education, 53, 169-182. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Johnson, A., Moher, T., Ohlsson, S., Gillingham, M. (1999). The round earth project—collaborative VR for conceptual learning. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 19(6), 60-69. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kaplan, M. D., Piskin, B., Bol, B. (2010). Educational blogging: Integrating technology into marketing experience. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 50-63. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Karns, G. (2005). An update of marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences, and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 163-171. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Kelley, C. A., Bridges, C. (2005). Introducing professional and career development skills in the marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 212-218. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Kelton, A. J. (2008, September/October). Virtual worlds? Outlook good. Educause Review, 43(5). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume43/VirtualWorldsOutlookGood/163161 Google Scholar | |
|
Kolb, A., Kolb, D. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193-212. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lee, E., Wong, K., Fung, C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 55, 1424-1442. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Li, T., Greenberg, B., Nicholls, J. (2007). Teaching experiential learning: Adoption of an innovative course in an MBA marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 29, 25-33. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Limniou, M., Roberts, D., Papadopoulos, N. (2008). Full immersive virtual environment CAVE™ in chemistry education. Computers & Education, 51, 584-593. Google Scholar | |
|
Matulich, E., Papp, R., Haytko, D. (2008). Continuous improvement through teaching innovations: A requirement for today’s learners. Marketing Education Review, 18(1), 1-7. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Monahan, T., McArdle, G., Bertolotto, M. (2008). Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Computers & Education, 50, 1339-1353. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Newman, A., Hermans, C. (2008). Breaking the MBA delivery mould: A virtual international multi-group MBA/practitioner collaborative project. Marketing Education Review, 18(1), 9-14. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ong, S., Mannan, M. (2004). Virtual reality simulations and animations in a web-based interactive manufacturing engineering module. Computers & Education, 43, 361-382. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Peltier, J., Schibrowsky, J., Drago, W. (2007). The interdependence of the factors influencing the perceived quality of the online learning experience: A causal model. Journal of Marketing Education, 29, 140-153. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25, 401-426. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Ramasundaram, V., Grunwald, S., Mangeot, A., Comerford, N. B., Bliss, C. M. (2005). Development of an environmental virtual field laboratory. Computers & Education, 45, 21-34. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ryan, G., Valverde, M., Rodriguez-Ardura, I. (2001). Marketing education, distance learning, and hypermedia: Teaching “Current issues in Marketing” in a virtual campus. Marketing Education Review, 11(3), 41-53. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Seitz, V., Razzouk, N. (2002). Teaching retailing and merchandising: An experiential approach. Marketing Education Review, 12(1), 53-60. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Simon, B., Haghirian, P., Schlegelmilch, B. (2003). Enriching global marketing education with virtual classrooms: An effectiveness study. Marketing Education Review, 13(3), 27-39. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sojka, J., Fish, M. (2008). Brief in-class role plays: An experiential teaching tool targeted to Generation Y students. Marketing Education Review, 18(1), 25-31. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sulbaran, T., Marcum, C. (2004, June). Preliminary study on the characteristics of virtual environments for reaching new heights in education. In Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Tuten, T. (2009). Real world experience, virtual world environment: The design and execution of marketing plans in Second Life. Marketing Education Review, 19(1), 1-5. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Wood, N. T., Solomon, M. R., Allan, D. (2008). Welcome to the Matrix: E-learning gets a Second Life. Marketing Education Review, 18(2), 47-53. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Workman, J. P. (2008). Wikis in the classroom: Opportunities and challenges. Marketing Education Review, 18(1), 19-24. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Wrzesien, M., Raya, M. (2010). Learning in serious virtual worlds: Evaluation of learning effectiveness and appeal to students in the E-Junior project. Computers & Education, 55, 178-187. Google Scholar | Crossref |
