Direct measures (tests) of the pedagogical effectiveness of team testing and indirect measures (student surveys) of pedagogical effectiveness of team testing were collected in several sections of an undergraduate marketing course with varying levels of the use of team testing. The results indicate that although students perceived team testing to have a substantial impact on their learning, this pedagogy in fact had no impact on direct measures of learning. In an additional analysis, the performance of the team on the group test was best predicted by the best individual performance on the team. Possible explanations and directions for future research are discussed.

AACSB International . (2010). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/business/STANDARDS.pdf
Google Scholar
Abrami, P. C., Leventhal, L., Perry, R. P. (1982). Educational seduction. Review of Educational Research, 52, 446-464.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bacon, D. R. (2003). Assessing learning outcomes: A comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions in a marketing context. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 31-36.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bacon, D. R. (2004). The contributions of reliability and pretests to effective assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(3). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=3
Google Scholar
Bacon, D. R. (2005). The effect of group projects on content- related learning outcomes. Journal of Management Education, 29, 248-267.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bacon, D. R., Bean, B. (2006). GPA in research studies: An invaluable but neglected opportunity. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 35-42.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bacon, D. R., Paul, P., Johnson, C., Conley, T. (2008). Improving writing through the marketing curriculum: A longitudinal study. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 217-225.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A. (2006). How fast do students forget what they learn in consumer behavior? A longitudinal study. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 181-192.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., Stewart-Belle, S. (1998). Exploring predictors of student team project performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 20, 63-71.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bargh, J. A., Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593-604.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Benek-Rivera, J., Mathews, V. E. (2004). Active learning with Jeopardy: Students ask the questions. Journal of Management Education, 28, 104-118.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Berry, J., Nyman, M. A. (2002). Small-group assessment methods in mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 33, 641-649.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Billington, R. (1994). Effects of collaborative test taking on retention in eight third-grade mathematics classes. Elementary School Journal, 95(1), 23-31.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Clayson, D. E. (2009). Student evaluations of teaching: Are they related to what students learn? A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 16-30.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Clayson, D. E., Haley, D. A. (1990). Student evaluations in marketing: What is actually being measured? Journal of Marketing Education, 12, 9-17.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281-309.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Dallmer, D. (2004). Collaborative test taking with adult learners. Adult Learning, 15(3/4), 4-7.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Ebbinghaus, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York, NY: Dover. (Original work published 1885)
Google Scholar
Fraser, S. C., Beaman, A. L., Diener, E., Kelem, R. T. (1977). Two, three, or four heads are better than one: Modification of college performance by peer mentoring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 101-108.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gabbert, B., Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. (1986). Cooperative learning, group-to-individual transfer, process gain, and the acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies. Journal of Psychology, 120, 265-278.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hamer, L. O. (2000). The additive effects of semistructured classroom activities on student learning: An application of classroom-based experiential learning techniques. Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 25-34.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Heider, F. (1976). A conversation with Fritz Heider. In Harvey, J. H., Ickes, W. J., Kidd, R. F. (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 1-18). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Hernandez, S. A. (2002). Team learning in a marketing principles course: Cooperative structures that facilitate active learning and higher level thinking. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 73-85.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. (2002). Social interdependence theory and university instruction: Theory into practice. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 119-129.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Karns, G. L. (1993). Marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 15(1), 3-10.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Karns, G. L. (2005). An update of marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences, and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 163-171.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Kennedy, E. J., Lawton, L., Plumlee, E. L. (2002). Blissful ignorance: The problem of unrecognized incompetence and academic performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 243-252.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Mallinger, M. (1998). Maintaining control in the classroom by giving up control. Journal of Management Education, 22, 472-483.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
McCorkle, D. E., Reardon, J., Alexander, J. F., Kling, N. D., Harris, R. C., Iyer, R. V. (1999). Undergraduate marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad, and the ugly? Journal of Marketing Education, 21, 106-117.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
McIntyre, S. H., Munson, J. M. (2008). Exploring cramming: Student behaviors, beliefs and learning retention in the principles of marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 226-243.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Metcalf, L. E. (2010). Creating international community service learning experiences in a capstone marketing projects course. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 155-171.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Michaelsen, L. K., Black, R. H. (1994). Building learning teams: The key to harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. In Kadel, S., Keehner, J. (Eds.), Collaborative learning: A sourcebook for higher education (Vol. 2, pp. 65-81). State College, PA: National Center for Teaching, Learning, and Assessment.
Google Scholar
Naftulin, D. H., Ware, J. E., Donnelly, F. A. (1973). The Doctor Fox lecture: A paradigm of educational seduction. Journal of Medical Education, 48, 630-635.
Google Scholar | Medline
Nowak, L. I., Miller, S. W. (1996). Team testing increases performance. Journal of Education for Business, 71, 253-256.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Paladino, A. (2008). Creating an interactive and responsive teaching environment to inspire learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 185-188.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Pfaff, E., Huddleston, P. (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 37-45.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Rao, S. P., Collins, H. L., DiCarlo, S. E. (2002). Collaborative testing enhances student learning. Advances in Physiology Education, 26(1), 37-41.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Revere, L., Elden, M., Bartsch, R. (2008). Designing group examinations to decrease social loafing and increase learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1). Retrieved from http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v2n1/articles/Revere-Elden-Bartsch/Article_Revere-Elden-Bartsch.pdf
Google Scholar
Rusth, D. B. (2000). Student teams and learning achievement. Journal of Business Education, 1, 18-23.
Google Scholar
Sax, G. (1997). Principles of educational and psychological measurement and evaluation (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Google Scholar
Schaffer, C. M. (1995). The use of the team learning approach in selected marketing courses. Marketing Education Review, 5, 41-50.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sitzmann, T., Ely, K., Brown, K., Bauer, K. (2010). Self-assessment of knowledge: A cognitive learning or affective measure? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 169-191.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Skilton, P. F., Forsyth, D., White, O. J. (2008). Interdependence and integration learning in student project teams: Do team project assignments achieve what we want them to? Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 57-65.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Slavin, R. E. (1988). Cooperative learning and student achievement. Educational Leadership, 46(2), 31-33.
Google Scholar | ISI
Slusser, S. R., Erickson, R. J. (2006). Group quizzes: An extension of the collaborative learning process. Teaching Sociology, 34, 249-262.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Stark, G. (2006). Stop “going over” exams! The multiple benefits of team exams. Journal of Management Education, 30, 818-827.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Strijbos, J. W. (2000). A classification model for group-based learning. European Journal of Open and Distance Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2000/strijbos/strijbos.html
Google Scholar
Strong, J. T., Anderson, R. E. (1990). Free-riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 12(2), 61-67.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Student profiles . (2011). Retrieved from http://www.du.edu/explore/studentprofiles.html
Google Scholar
Webb, N. J., Grib, T. F. (1967). Teaching process as a learning experience: The experimental use of student-led groups (Final Report No. HE-000-882). Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Google Scholar
Williams, D. L., Beard, J. D., Rymer, J. (1991). Team projects: Achieving their full potential. Journal of Marketing Education, 13(2), 45-53.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Zimbardo, P. G., Butler, L. D., Wolfe, V. A. (2003). Cooperative college examinations: More gain, less pain when students share information and grades. Journal of Experimental Education, 71, 101-125.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JMD-article-ppv for $36.00