The need to endow marketing graduates with skills relevant to employability grows ever more important. Marketing math and elementary financial understanding are essential employability skills, particularly given the contemporary emphasis on marketing metrics, but the evidence is that marketing graduates are often relatively weak in such skills. This article suggests that one educational strategy to improve numeracy and financial skills may be through the use of a marketing simulation game. Through the simulation game, students are exposed to marketing calculations and financial data in an engaging context that simulates the real world. It is hypothesized that marketing students’ numeracy and financial skills, and their self-efficacy with respect to marketing calculations, will improve following participation in a simulation game where numerical and financial analysis are necessary activities. Using a quasi-experimental research design, it is found that there are substantial and significant improvements in numerical and financial performance after participating in a simulation game, but that there is no improvement (and possibly a small decline) in self-efficacy related to these tasks. Marketing educators are advised that a marketing simulation game is a viable option to consider when seeking to improve students’ numeracy and financial skills.

Ardley, B., Taylor, N. (2010). The student practitioner: Developing skills through the marketing research consultancy project. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28, 847-861.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A. (2006). How fast do students forget what they learn in consumer behavior? A longitudinal study. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 181-192. doi:10.1177/0273475306291463
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
Google Scholar
Betz, N. E., Hackett, G. (1983). The relationship of mathematics self-efficacy expectations to the selection of science-based college majors. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 23, 329-345.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bobot, L. (2010). Teaching sales and negotiation with combining computer-based simulation and case discussions. Marketing Education Review, 20, 115-122.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brew, C. (2001). Women, mathematics and epistemology: An integrated framework. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 5(1), 15-32. doi:10.1080/13603110010003515
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Bynner, J., Parsons, S. (1997). Does numeracy matter? London, England: Basic Skills Agency.
Google Scholar
Faria, A. J. (2001). The changing nature of business simulation gaming research: A brief history. Simulation & Gaming, 32, 97-110.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Faria, A. J. (2006, October). History, current usage, and learning from marketing simulation games: A detailed literature review. Paper presented at the proceedings of the Marketing Management Association, Nashville, TE.
Google Scholar
Ganesh, G., Qin, S., Barat, S. (2010). Improving the marketing math skills of marketing undergraduate students through a unique undergraduate marketing math course. Marketing Education Review, 20(1), 47-63.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gibson-Sweet, M., Brennan, R., Foy, A., Lynch, J., Rudolph, P. (2010). Key issues in marketing education: The marketing educators’ view. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28, 931-943.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gopinath, C., Sawyer, J. E. (1999). Exploring the learning from an enterprise simulation. Journal of Management Development, 18, 477-489.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Jennings, D. (2002). Strategic management: An evaluation of the use of three learning methods. Journal of Management Development, 21, 655-665.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Keys, B., Wolfe, J. (1990). The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management, 16, 307-336.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Kline, P. (1999). The handbook of psychological testing (2nd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Lockett, G. (1974). Thoughts in numeracy in management. Personnel Review, 3(2), 36-39.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mason, C., Perreault, W. D. (2001). The marketing game! New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
McIntyre, S. H., Munson, J. M. (2008). Exploring cramming: Student behaviors, beliefs, and learning retention in the principles of marketing course. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 226-243. doi:10.1177/0273475308321819
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543-578.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Pajares, F., Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124-139.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Pajares, F., Kransler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426-443.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Parsons, S., Bynner, J. (2005). Does numeracy matter more? London, England: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.
Google Scholar
Pilling, B. K., Rigdon, E. E., Brightman, H. J. (2012). Building a metrics-enabled marketing curriculum: The cornerstone course. Journal of Marketing Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0273475312450390
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Pirog, S. F. (2010). Promoting statistical analysis in the marketing curriculum: A conjoint analysis exercise. Marketing Education Review, 20, 249-254.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Pollack, B. L., Lilly, B. (2008). Gaining confidence and competence through experiential assignments: An exploration of student self-efficacy and spectrum of inquiry. Marketing Education Review, 18(2), 55-66.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Robson, C. (1993). Real world research. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Saber, J. L., Foster, M. K. (2011). The agony and the ecstasy: Teaching marketing metrics to undergraduate business students. Marketing Education Review, 21(1), 9-20.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Schlee, R. P., Harich, K. R. (2010). Knowledge and skill requirements for marketing jobs in the 21st century. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 341-352. doi:10.1177/0273475310380881
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Strong, J. T., Anderson, R. E. (1990). Free riding in group projects: Control mechanisms and preliminary data. Journal of Marketing Education, 12, 61-67.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Vos, L., Brennan, R. (2010). Marketing simulation games: Student and lecturer perspectives. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28, 882-897.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Walker, I., Tsarenko, Y., Wagstaff, P., Powell, I., Steel, M., Brace-Govan, J. (2009). The development of competent marketing professionals. Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 253-263. doi:10.1177/0273475309345197
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Wellman, N. (2010). The employability attributes required of new marketing graduates. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28, 908-930.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wolfe, J., Roberts, C. R. (1993). A further study of the external validity of business games: Five-year peer group indicators. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 21-33.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Zanakis, S. H., Valenzi, E. R. (1997). Student anxiety and attitudes in business statistics. Journal of Education for Business, 73(1), 10-16.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Zantow, K., Knowlton, D. S., Sharp, D. (2005). More fun and games: Reconsidering the virtues of strategic management simulations. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 451-458.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Zeidner, M. (1992). Statistics and mathematics anxiety in social science students: Some interesting parallels. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 319-328.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JMD-article-ppv for $36.00