![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This research investigates the reliability and validity of three major publications’ rankings of MBA programs. Each set of rankings showed reasonable consistency over time, both at the level of the overall rankings and for most of the facets from which the rankings are derived. Each set of rankings also showed some levels of convergent and discriminant validity, but each has room for improvement, particularly Businessweek, which relies heavily on subjective surveys of students and recruiters, and Financial Times, whose methodology may be simplified and streamlined, ceasing to measure facets that are empirically superfluous. Together the three publications blanket the student process—U.S. News & World Report captures incoming student quality clearly with GMAT scores, Businessweek captures whether the students are happy while at their respective business schools, and U.S. News captures salaries and Financial Times captures return on investment, as short-term and longer term indicators of graduates’ early career successes.
References
Section:
|
Anninos, L. (2011). University performance evaluation approaches: The case of ranking systems. Retrieved from http://www.ep.liu.se/ecp/026/111/ecp0726111.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G. (2010). Handbook of marketing scales: Multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar | |
|
Buela-Casal, G., Gutierrez-Martinez, O., Bermudez-Sanchez, M. P., Vadillo-Munoz, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings ofunivs. Scientometrics, 71, 349-365. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Clayson, D. E. (2009). Student evaluations of teaching: Are they related to what students learn? Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 16-30. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Datar, S., Garvin, D., Cullen, P. (2010). Rethinking the MBA: Business education at a crossroads. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Durbin, J., Watson, G. S. (1951). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression, II. Biometrika, 38, 159-179. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Fee, C., Hadlock, C., Pierce, J. (2005). Business school rankings and business school deans: A study of nonprofit governance. Financial Management, 34(1), 143-166. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Finney, S. (2011). The influence of media rankings on US full-time MBA programs and their stakeholders. Reflecting Education, 7, 40-54. Google Scholar | |
|
Green, R. G., Baskind, F. R., Fassler, A., Jordan, A. (2006). The validity of the 2004 U.S. News & World Report’s rankings of schools of social work. Social Work, 51, 135-145. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Hinds, T., Falgoust, D., Thomas, K., Budden, M. (2010). Examining the perceptions of brand images regarding competing MBA programs. American Journal of Business Education, 3(12), 7-18. Google Scholar | |
|
Hunt, S. D., Chonko, L. B., Wood, V. R. (1986). Marketing education and marketing success: Are they related? Journal of Marketing Education, 8(2), 2-13. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Klein, S. P., Hamilton, L. (1998, February 18). The validity of the U.S. News and World Report ranking of ABA law schools. Retrieved from http://www.aals.org/reports/validity.html Google Scholar | |
|
Marquardt, D. W. (1970). Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics, 12, 605-607. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Martinez, R. (2002). Mexico’s MBA programs: Seven years into NAFTA. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 1(8), 25-30. Google Scholar | |
|
Mitra, D., Golder, P. N. (2008). Does academic research help or hurt MBA programs? Journal of Marketing, 72(September), 31-49. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar | |
|
Pfeffer, J., Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1, 78-95. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Proudlove, N. (2012a). Cracking the rankings Part (i): Understanding the Financial Times MBA rankings. OR Insight, 25, 221-240. Google Scholar | |
|
Proudlove, N. (2012b). Cracking the rankings Part (ii): Understanding the Financial Times European business schools rankings. OR Insight, 25, 241-253. Google Scholar | |
|
Roth, P. L., BeVier, C. A., Switzer, F. S., Schippmann, J. S. (1996). Meta-analyzing the relationship between grads and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 548-556. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rydzewski, D., Eastman, J., Bocchi, J. (2010). Important characteristics in an MBA program: The perceptions of online MBA students. American Journal of Business Education, 3(4), 33-42. Google Scholar | |
|
Schatz, M. (1993). What’s wrong with MBA ranking surveys? Management Research News, 16(7), 15-18. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Spais, G., Filis, G. (2006). Some philosophical enquiries on e-learning: Preparing the tomorrow business school. Journal of Business Case Studies, 2(4), 55-64. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Thomas, H., Cornuel, E. (2011). Business school futures: Evaluation and perspectives. Journal of Management Development, 30, 444-450. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Thompson, R. (2011, March 23). The rankings game. Harvard Business School Alumni Bulletin, pp. 1-4. Google Scholar | |
|
Tracy, J., Waldfogel, J. (1997). The best business schools: A market-based approach. Journal of Business, 70, 1-31. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
van Der Veen, J . (2004). Ten reasons why MBA ranking do not make sense—and one reason why they do. Decision Line, 35(3), 7-13. Google Scholar | |
|
Varman, R., Saha, B., Skalen, P. (2011). Market subjectivity and neoliberal governmentality in higher education. Journal of Marketing Management, 27, 1163-1185. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Weiss, A. (1995). Human capital vs. signaling explanation of wages. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 133-154. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
