Colleges of business must meet assurance of learning requirements to gain or maintain AACSB accreditation under the new standards adopted April 8, 2013. Team skills are among the most important skills desired by recruiters, yet employers and scholars perceive that team skills are frequently deficient in college graduates. This article describes how a set of free web-based tools available at www.CATME.org allows colleges to collect data to determine whether their students are developing good team skills and demonstrate achievement for accreditation reviews for learning goals related to team skills. The tools, which were developed to support teamwork in college classes, allow instructors to easily collect, interpret, and share data about students and teams. We show how colleges that use the CATME system in all courses requiring teamwork could analyze the data to demonstrate that their programs develop students’ team skills. The appendix provides 13 examples of learning goals colleges could use, along with a method to demonstrate achievement for each, and a sample measurable program target. These examples relate to team skills such as working with teammates of diverse backgrounds, contributing effectively to teams, displaying good interpersonal skills, being able to evaluate teamwork, and recognizing team processes and outcomes.

AACSB International . (2013). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation (Adopted April 8, 2013). Retrieved from www.aacsb.edu
Google Scholar
Alsop, R. (2002, September 9). Playing well with others. The Wall Street Journal, R11.
Google Scholar
American Management Association . (2010). AMA 2010 Critical Skills Survey. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/Critical%20Skills%20Survey%20Executive%20Summary.pdf
Google Scholar
Bacon, D. R. (2003). A comparison of multiple-choice and short-answer questions in a marketing context. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 31-36.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bacon, D. R. (2005). The effect of group projects on content-related learning. Journal of Management Education, 29, 248-267.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., Anderson, E. S. (2001). Methods of assigning players to teams: A review and novel approach. Simulation & Gaming, 32, 6-17.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bacon, D. R., Stewart, K. A., Silver, W. S. (1999). Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the difference. Journal of Management Education, 23, 467-488.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Baker, D. F. (2008). Peer assessment in small groups: A comparison of methods. Journal of Management Education, 33, 183-209.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bamberger, P. A., Erev, I., Kimmel, M., Oref-Chen, T. (2005). Peer assessment, individual performance, and contribution to group processes: The impact of rater anonymity. Group & Organization Management, 30, 344-377.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Biemann, T., Cole, M. S., Voelpel, S. (2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rwg and rwg(j) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. Leadership Quarterly, 23, 66-80.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bliese, P. D. (1998). Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: A simulation. Organizational Research Methods, 1, 355-373.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within group agreement, non-independence and reliability: Implications for data and analysis. In Klein, K. J., Kozlowski, S. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Boni, A. A., Weingart, L. R., Evenson, S. (2009). Innovation in an academic setting: Designing and leading a business through market-focused, interdisciplinary teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 407-417.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Brutus, S., Donia, M. B. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of students in groups with a centralized peer evaluation system. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 652-662.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Brutus, S., Donia, M. B., Ronen, S. (2013). Can business students learn to evaluate better? Evidence from repeated exposure to a peer evaluation system. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12, 18-31.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bryant, S. M., Albring, S. M. (2006). Effective team building: Guidance for accounting educators. Issues in Accounting Education, 21, 241-265.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Burdett, J. (2003). Making groups work: University students’ perceptions. International Education Journal, 4, 177-190.
Google Scholar
Calloway School of Business and Accountancy of Wake Forest University . (2004, February). A report on recruiters’ perceptions of undergraduate business schools and students. Winston-Salem, NC: Author.
Google Scholar
Carless, S. A., de Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31, 71-88.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Chapman, K. J., Meuter, M., Toy, D., Wright, L. (2006). Can’t we pick our own groups? The influence of group selection method on group dynamics and outcomes. Journal of Management Education, 30, 557-569.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Chapman, K. J., van Auken, S. (2001). Creating positive group project experiences: An examination of the role of the instructor on students’ perceptions of group projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 117-127.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Chen, G., Donahue, L. M., Klimoski, R. J. (2004). Training undergraduates to work in organizational teams. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 3, 27-40.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
The Chronicle of Higher Education Almanac Issue (2009-10). 56(1), August 28, 2009.
Google Scholar
Cottell, P. G., Millis, B. J. (1992). Cooperative learning in accounting. Journal of Accounting Education, 10, 95-111.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Deeter-Schmelz, D. R., Kennedy, K. N., Ramsey, R. P. (2002). Enriching our understanding of student team effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 114-124.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Google Scholar
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review. Studies in Higher Education, 24, 331-350.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Dominick, P. G., Reilly, R. R., McGourty, J. W. (1997). The effects of peer feedback on team member behavior. Group & Organization Management, 22, 508-520.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Druskat, V. U., Wolff, S. B. (1999). Effects and timing of developmental peer appraisals in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 58-74.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Ehrlinger, J., Johnson, K., Banner, M., Dunning, D., Kruger, J. (2008). Why the unskilled are unaware: Further explorations of (absent) self-insight among the incompetent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105, 98-121.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Feichtner, S. B., Davis, E. A. (1984). Why some groups fail: A survey of students’ experiences with learning groups. Journal of Management Education, 9(4), 58-73.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Felder, R. M., Brent, R. (2001). Effective strategies for cooperative learning. Journal of Cooperation & Collaboration in College Teaching, 10, 69-75.
Google Scholar
Fellenz, M. R. (2006). Toward fairness in assessing student groupwork: A protocol for peer evaluation of individual contributions. Journal of Management Education, 30, 570-591.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Gardiner, L. R., Corbitt, G., Adams, S. J. (2010). Program assessment: Getting to a practical how-to model. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 139-144.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gueldenzoph, L. E., May, G. L. (2002). Collaborative peer evaluation: Best practices for group member assessments. Business Communication Quarterly, 65, 9-20.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hart Research Associates . (2006). How should colleges prepare students to succeed in today’s global economy? A survey of employers conducted on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities. Washington, DC: Peter D. Hart Research Associates.
Google Scholar
Hart Research Associates . (2010). Raising the bar: Employers’ views on college learning in the wake of the economic downturn. A survey of employers conducted on behalf of the Association of American Colleges and Universities. Washington, DC: Hart Research Associates.
Google Scholar
Heidemeier, H., Moser, K. (2009). Self–other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 353-370.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Hernandez, S. A. (2002). Team learning in a marketing principles course: Cooperative structures that facilitate active learning and higher level thinking. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 73-85.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hess, P. W. (2007). Enhancing leadership skill development by creating practice/feedback opportunities in the classroom. Journal of Management Education, 31, 195-213.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hooijberg, R., Lane, N. (2009). Using multisource feedback coaching effectively in executive education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 483-493.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hughes, R. L., Jones, S. K. (2011). Developing and assessing college student teamwork skills. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(149), 53-64.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Inderrieden, E. J., Allen, R. E., Keaveny, T. J. (2004). Managerial discretion in the use of self-ratings in an appraisal system: The antecedents and consequences. Journal of Managerial Issues, 16, 460-482.
Google Scholar
Jassawalla, A., Sashittal, H., Malshe, A. (2009). Students’ perceptions of social loafing: It’s antecedents and consequences in undergraduate business classroom teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 42-54.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jehn, K. A., Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., Smith, K. A. (2006). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom (3rd ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book.
Google Scholar
Kaufman, D. B., Felder, R. M., Fuller, H. (2000). Accounting for individual effort in cooperative learning teams. Journal of Engineering Education, 8, 133-140.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kirk, D. J. (2005). Taking back the classroom: Tips for the college professor on becoming a more effective teacher. Des Moines, IA: Tiberius.
Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Kraiger, K. (2008). Transforming our models of learning and development: Web-based instruction as an enabler of third-generation instruction. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 454-467.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kruger, J., Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Lancellotti, M. P., Boyd, T. (2008). The effects of team personality awareness exercises on team satisfaction and performance: The context of marketing course projects. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 244-254.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Layton, R. A., Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. W., Ricco, G. D. (2010). Design and validation of a web-based system for assigning members to teams using instructor-specified criteria. Advances in Engineering Education, 2(1), 1-28.
Google Scholar
Loyd, D. L., Kern, M. C., Thompson, L. (2005). Classroom research: Bridging the ivory divide. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 8-21.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Loughry, M. L., Ohland, M. W., Moore, D. D. (2007). Development of a theory-based assessment of team member effectiveness. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 505-524.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Loughry, M. L., Tosi, H. L. (2008). Performance implications of peer monitoring. Organization Science, 19, 876-890.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
MacDonald, H. A., Sulsky, L. M. (2009). Rating formats and rater training redux: A context-specific approach for enhancing the effectiveness of performance management. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41, 227-240.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team process. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mayo, M., Kakarika, M., Pastor, J. C., Brutus, S. (2012). Aligning or inflating your leadership self-image? A longitudinal study of responses to peer feedback in MBA teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 631-652.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McCorkle, D. E., Reardon, J., Alexander, J. F., Kling, N. D., Harris, R. C., Iyer, R. V. (1999). Undergraduate marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad, and the ugly? Journal of Marketing Education, 21, 106-117.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Mero, N. P., Guidice, R. M., Brownlee, A. L. (2007). Accountability in a performance appraisal context: The effect of audience and form of accounting on rater response and behavior. Journal of Management, 33, 223-252.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Michaelsen, L. K., Knight, A. B., Fink, L. D. (Eds.). (2004). Team-based learning: A transformative use of small groups in college teaching. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
Google Scholar
Millis, B. J., Cottell, P. G. (1998). Cooperative learning for higher education faculty. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education.
Google Scholar
Moriarty, P., Buckley, F. (2003). Increasing team emotional intelligence through process. Journal of European Industrial Training, 27, 82-110.
Google Scholar | Crossref
National Association of Colleges and Employers . (2011). Job outlook: The candidate skills/qualities employers want. Retrieved from http://www.naceweb.org/s10262011/candidate_skills_employer_qualities/
Google Scholar
Oakley, B., Felder, R. M., Brent, R., Elhajj, I. (2004). Turning student groups into effective teams. Journal of Student Centered Learning, 2, 9-34.
Google Scholar
Ohland, M. W., Loughry, M. L., Layton, R. A., Lyons, R., Ferguson, D. M., Heyne, K., Driskell, T., Woehr, D. J., Pomeranz, H.R., Salas, E., Loignon, A.C., Sonesh, S. C. (2013). SMARTER Teamwork: System for Management, Assessment, Research, Training, Education, and Remediation for Teamwork. Proceedings of the 2013 American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
Google Scholar
Ohland, M. W., Loughry, M. L., Woehr, D. J., Finelli, C. J., Bullard, L. G., Felder, R. M., Schmucker, D. G. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self and peer evaluation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 609-630.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pfaff, E., Huddleston, P. (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 37-45.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Pope, N. K. L. (2005). The impact of stress in self- and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 51-63.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Raelin, J. (2006). Does action learning promote collaborative leadership? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 5, 152-168.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rosen, M. A., Salas, E., Pavlas, D., Jensen, R., Fu, D., Lampton, D. (2010). Demonstration-based training: A review of instructional features. Human Factors, 52, 596-609.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Saavedra, R., Kwun, S. K. (1993). Peer evaluation in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 450-462.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., Burke, C. S. (2005). Is there “big five” in teamwork? Small Group Research, 36, 555-599.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Salas, E., Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471-499.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Shankar, P. G., Seow, J. L. (2010). The association between students’ lone wolf tendencies and their perceptions, preferences, and performance outcomes in team projects. Journal of Accounting Education, 28, 75-84.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Taggar, S., Brown, T. C. (2006). Interpersonal affect and peer rating bias in teams. Small Group Research, 37, 87-111.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Thomas, G., Martin, D., Pleasants, K. (2011). Using self- and peer-assessment to enhance students’ future-learning in higher education. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 8(1), Article 5.
Google Scholar
Vance, E. (2007, February 2). College graduates lack key skills, report says. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(22), A30.
Google Scholar
Van der Vegt, G. S., Emans, B. J. M., Van de Vliert, E. (2001). Patterns of interdependence in work teams: A two-level investigation of the relations with job and team satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 54, 51-69.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Verzat, C., Byrne, J., Fayolle, A. (2009). Tangling with spaghetti: Pedagogical lessons from games. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 356-369.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Vik, G. N. (2001). Doing more to teach teamwork than telling students to sink or swim. Business Communication Quarterly, 64, 112-119.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
The Wall Street Journal/Harris Interactive Survey . (2002, September 9). The rating criteria. The Wall Street Journal, p. R5.
Google Scholar
Willcoxson, L. E. (2006). “It’s not fair!” Assessing the dynamics and resourcing of teamwork. Journal of Management Education, 30, 798-808.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Young, C. B., Henquinet, J. A. (2000). A conceptual framework for designing group projects. Journal of Education for Business, 76, 56-60.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Zantow, K., Knowlton, D. S., Sharp, D. C. (2005). More than fun and games: Reconsidering the virtues of strategic management simulations. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4, 451-458.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JMD-article-ppv for $36.00
JMD-article-ppv for $36.00