![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This research explores and tests the effect of an innovative performance feedback practice—feedback supplemented with web-based peer benchmarking—through a lens of social cognitive framework for self-regulated learning. The results suggest that providing performance feedback with references to exemplary peer output is positively associated with task mastery orientation, perceived autonomy, and perceived competence which in turn improve students’ intrinsic motivation and self-regulated learning strategies. The results also suggest that these effects were not observed in a similar course in which performance feedback was not supplemented with web-based peer benchmarking.
References
Section:
|
Ackerman, D. S., Gross, B. L. (2010). Instructor feedback: How much do students really want? Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 172-181. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Ames, C., Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business . (2013). Eligibility procedures and standards for business accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/en/accreditation/standards/2013-business.aspx Google Scholar | |
|
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Google Scholar | |
|
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy on cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D. (2007). The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 13, 273-281. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 219-233. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Corno, L., Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychology, 18, 88-108. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Czaplewski, A. J. (2009). Computer-assisted grading rubrics: Automating the process of providing comments and student feedback. Marketing Education Review, 19, 29-36. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ferrer-Caja, E., Weiss, M. R. (2002). Cross-validation of a model of intrinsic motivation with students enrolled in high school elective courses. Journal of Experimental Education, 71, 41-66. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Geddes, D. (2009). How am I doing? Exploring on-line gradebook monitoring as a self-regulated learning practice that impacts academic achievement. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 494-510. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Harter, S. (1981). A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components. Developmental Psychology, 17, 300-312. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Higgins, R., Hartley, P., Skelton, A. (2002). The conscientious consumer: Reconsidering the role of assessment feedback in student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 53-64. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Jackson, N., Lund, H. (Eds.). (2000). Benchmarking for higher education: Taking stock. Buckingham, England: Open University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Klein, W., Weinstein, N. (Eds.). (1997). Social comparison and unrealistic optimism about personal risk. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Lilly, B., Tippins, M. J. (2002). Enhancing student motivation in marketing classes: Using student management groups. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 253-264. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Love, E. G., Love, D. W., Northcraft, G. B. (2010). Is the end in sight? Student regulation of in-class and extra-credit effort in response to performance feedback. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9, 81-97. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514-523. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Miller, D. T., Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213-225. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Peterson, R. M. (2001). Course participation: An active learning approach employing student documentation. Journal of Marketing Education, 23, 187-194. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Pintrich, P. R. (1988). A process-oriented view of student motivation. In Stark, J., Mets, L. (Eds.), Improving teaching and learning through research: New directions for instructional research (Vol. 57, pp. 65-79). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Pintrich, P. R., De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulation learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Preacher, K. J., Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptomatic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). Abingdon, England: RoutledgeFalmer. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Raska, D., Keller, E., Shaw, D. (2013). Using web-based peer benchmarking to manage the client-based project. Marketing Education Review, 23, 23-29. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ridley, D. S., Schutz, P. A., Glanz, R. S., Weinstein, C. E. (1992). Self-regulated learning: The interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 293-306. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Seevers, M. T., Rowe, W. J., Skinner, S. J. (2014). Praise in public, criticize in private? An assessment of performance feedback transparency in a classroom setting. Marketing Education Review, 24, 85-99. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Somuncuoglu, Y., Yildirim, A. (1999). Relationship between achievement goal orientations and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Research, 92, 267-277. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Tolli, A. P., Schmidt, A. M. (2008). The role of feedback, causal attributions, and self-efficacy in goal revision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 692-701. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and motivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003-1017. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Wetsch, L. R. (2009). Using peer benchmarking to improve student motivation, effort, and performance. Marketing Education Review, 19, 89-93. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Young, M. R. (2005). The motivational effects of the classroom environment in facilitating self–regulated learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 27, 25-40. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
