Conventional wisdom holds that research-productive faculty are also the finest instructors. But, is this commonly held belief correct? In the current study, the notion that faculty scholarship exhibits a positive association with teaching evaluations is investigated. Reflecting the data structure of faculty nested within university, the current study uses hierarchical linear modeling, and finds that scholarship displays a positive correspondence with teaching evaluations, but only for male faculty publishing in elite or top-tier marketing journals. Although this linkage is only found under specific conditions, it stands in contrast to much of the extant literature, which reports little to no correlation between research and teaching evaluations. In addition, significant control variables and interactions, at both the faculty level (i.e., gender, faculty title) and university level (i.e., tuition, entry GPA, flagship university), are identified. In total, the findings suggest that while there is an association between elite publications and student evaluations, the primacy of research in the academy may, nonetheless, not always be in the best interest of students.

Aiken, L. S., West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Arnold, I. J. M. (2008). Course level and the relationship between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Economic Education, 39, 307-321.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bacon, D. R., Bean, B. (2006). GPA in research studies: An invaluable but neglected opportunity. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 35-42.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bacon, D. R., Novotny, J. (2002). Exploring achievement striving as a moderator of the grading leniency effect. Journal of Marketing Education, 24, 4-14.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bacon, D. R., Paul, P., Stewart, K. A., Mukhopadhyay, K. (2012). A new tool for identifying research standards and evaluating research performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 34, 194-208.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Burke, L. A., Rau, B. (2010). The research-teaching gap in management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 132-143.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Clayson, D. E. (2009). Student evaluations of teaching: Are they related to what students learn? A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 16-30.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Clayson, D. E. (2014). What does RateMyProfessors.com actually rate? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39, 678-698.
Google Scholar
Clayson, D. E., Frost, T. F., Sheffet, M. J. (2006). Grades and the student evaluation of instruction: A test of the reciprocity effect. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 52-65.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Coladarci, T., Kornfield, I. (2007). RateMyProfessors.com versus formal in-class student evaluations of teaching. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(6), 1-15.
Google Scholar
DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and application, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Disatnik, D., Sivan, L. (2014). The multicollinearity illusion in moderated regression analysis. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2283066
Google Scholar
Estelami, H. (2014). The effects of survey timing on student evaluation of teaching measures obtained using online surveys. Journal of Marketing Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0273475314552324
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Feldman, K. A. (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education, 26, 227-298.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Feldman, K. A. (1993). College students’ views of male and female college teachers: Part II. Research in Higher Education, 34, 151-191.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Felton, J., Koper, P. T., Mitchell, J., Stinson, M. (2008). Attractiveness, easiness and other issues: Student evaluations of professors on RateMyProfessors.com. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 45-61.
Google Scholar
Felton, J., Mitchell, J., Stinson, M. (2004). Web-based student evaluations of professors: The relations between perceived quality, easiness and sexiness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 91-108.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Field, J. R., Bergiel, B. J., Viosca, R. C. (2008). An exploratory study of student use and perceived accuracy of faculty evaluations on RateMyProfessors.com. Competition Forum, 6, 378-383.
Google Scholar
Figlio, D. N., Schapiro, M. O., Soter, K. B. (2013). Are tenure track professors better teachers? (NBER Working Paper 19406). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w19406
Google Scholar
Freeman, H. R. (1994). Student evaluations of college instructors: Effects of type of course taught, instructor gender and gender role, and student gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 627-630.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Frost, P. J., Fukami, C. V. (1997). Teaching effectiveness in the organizational sciences: Recognizing and enhancing the scholarship of teaching. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1271-1281.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gruber, T., Lowrie, A., Brodowsky, G. H., Reppel, A. E., Voss, R., Chowdhury, I. N. (2012). Investigating the influence of professor characteristics on student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: A comparative study. Journal of Marketing Education, 34, 165-178.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Hartman, K. B., Hunt, J. B. (2013). What RateMyProfessors.com reveals about how and why students evaluated their professors: A glimpse into the student mind-set. Marketing Education Review, 23, 151-161.
Google Scholar
Hattie, J., Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 507-542.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hunter, J. E., Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Johnson, V. E. (2003). Grade inflation: A crisis in college education. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar
Kenward, M. G., Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53(September), 983-997.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kierstead, D., D’Agostino, P., Dill, H. (1988). Sex role stereotyping of college professors: Bias in students’ ratings of instructors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 342-344.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Langbein, L. I. (1994). The validity of student evaluations of teaching. Political Science and Politics, 27, 545-553.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lawson, R. A., Stephenson, E. F. (2005). Easiness, attractiveness, and faculty evaluations: Evidence from RateMyProfessors.com. Atlantic Economic Journal, 33, 485-486.
Google Scholar
Luo, Y. (2001). Determinants of local responsiveness: Perspectives from foreign subsidiaries in an emerging market. Journal of Management, 27, 451-477.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Luscombe, B. (2013, March 18). Don’t hate her because she’s successful. TIME Magazine. http://ideas.time.com/2013/03/07/confidence-woman/
Google Scholar
Madden, T. J., Dillon, W. R., Leak, R. L. (2010). Students’ evaluation of teaching: Concerns of item diagnosticity. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 264-274.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Marsh, H. W., Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic, or independent constructs? Journal of Higher Education, 73, 603-641.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Marsh, H. W., Roche, L. A. (2000). Effects of grading leniency and low workload on students’ evaluations of teaching: Popular myth, bias, validity, or innocent bystanders? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 202-228.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McDaniel, M. A., Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E. (1988). Job experience correlates of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 327-330.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McPherson, A. M., Jewell, R. T., Kim, M. (2009). What determines student evaluation scores? A random effects analysis of undergraduate economics classes. Eastern Economic Journal, 35, 37-51.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mitra, D., Golder, P. N. (2008). Does academic research help or hurt MBA programs? Journal of Marketing, 72(5), 31-49.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Otto, J., Sanford, D. A., Ross, D. N. (2008). Does Ratemyprofessor.com really rate my professor? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 355-368.
Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Polonsky, M. J., Juric, B., Mankelow, G. (2003). Attitudes about work practices, time allocation, and publication output: Profiles of U.S. marketing academics. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 218-230.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Pounder, J. S. (2007). Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analytical framework for answering the question. Quality Assurance in Education, 15, 178-191.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Quinones, M. A., Ford, J. K., Teachout, M. S. (1995). The relationship between work experience and job performance: A conceptual meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 48, 887-910.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ragan, J. F., Walia, B. (2010). Research in economic education: Differences in student evaluations of principles and other economics courses and the allocation of faculty across courses. Journal of Economic Education, 41, 335-352.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S. (2002), Hierarchical linear models applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Read, W. J., Rama, D. V., Raghunandan, K. (2001). The relationship between student evaluations of teaching and faculty evaluations. Journal of Education for Business, 76, 189-192.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Riniolo, T. C., Johnson, K. C., Sherman, T. R., Misso, J. A. (2006). Hot or not: Do professors perceived as physically attractive receive higher student evaluations? Journal of General Psychology, 133, 19-35.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Robertson, J., Bond, C. H. (2001). Experiences of the relation between teaching and research: What do academics value? Higher Education Research and Development, 20, 5-19.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sample, S. B. (1972). Inherent conflict between research and education. Educational Record, 53, 17-22.
Google Scholar
Shepherd, C. D., Carley, S. S., Stuart, R. S. (2009). An exploratory investigation of the periodic performance evaluation processes for marketing faculty: A comparison of doctoral-granting and non-doctoral-granting universities. Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 143-153.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Silva, K. M., Silva, F. J., Quinn, M. A., Draper, J. N., Cover, K. R., Munoff, A. A. (2008). Rate My Professor: Online evaluations of psychology instructors. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 71-80.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Simpson, P. M., Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Student evaluations of teaching: An exploratory study of the faculty response. Journal of Marketing Education, 22, 199-213.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Singer, J. D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24, 323-355.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Snijders, T. A. B., Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Steward, M. D., Lewis, B. R. (2010). A comprehensive analysis of marketing journal rankings. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 75-92.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Timmerman, T. (2008). On the validity of RateMyProfessors.com. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 55-61.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JMD-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in: