![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Simulations are a form of competitive training that can provide transformational learning. Participants are pushed by the competition and their own desire to win as well as the continual feedback, encouragement, and guidance of a Business Coach. Simulations enable students to apply their knowledge and practice their business skills over and over. Taken all together, these conditions help students develop their competence in marketing and business. Competitive business simulations are inherently valuable learning experiences, but this potential can be greatly enriched. The purpose of this article is to summarize the development process of a modern business simulation, illustrating how a valued pedagogy can be enhanced through careful planning and thoughtful consideration of the goals, strategy, features, and benefits of the learning experience.
References
Section:
|
Batko, M. (2015). Business management simulations: A detailed industry analysis as well as recommendations for the future. Wien, Austria: Vienna University of Economics and Business. Google Scholar | |
|
Brooks, B. W., Burson, T. E., Rudd, D. V. (2006, Winter). Addressing current research gaps and directions in educational marketing simulations. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 9, 43-49. Google Scholar | |
|
Burns, A. C., Gentry, J. W. (1992, Spring). Computer simulation games in marketing: Past, present, and future. Marketing Education Review, 2, 3-13. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Cadotte, E. R. (2005, July). Working to enhance the business simulation pedagogy: Goals, strategy, features and benefits. Archive of Marketing Education, 1-28. Google Scholar | |
|
Cadotte, E. R. (2014a). Metrics for mentors. Tampa, FL: BizEd, AACSB International. Google Scholar | |
|
Cadotte, E. R. (2014b). The use of simulations in entrepreneurship education: Opportunities, challenges and outcomes. In Morris, M. H. (Ed.), Annals of entrepreneurship education & pedagogy (pp. 280-304). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Cadotte, E. R., Bruce, H. J. (2003). The management of strategy in the marketplace. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western. Google Scholar | |
|
Cadotte, E. R., MacGuire, C. (2013, Fall). A pedagogy to enhance the value of simulations in the classroom. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 33-52. Google Scholar | |
|
Capretz, P. (1987). French in action: A beginning course in language and culture. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Faria, A. J. (2001). The changing nature of business simulation/gaming research: A brief history. Simulation & Gaming, 32, 97-110. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Feinstein, A. H., Cannon, H. M. (2002). Constructs of simulation evaluation. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 425-440. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Gosen, J., Washbush, J. (2004). A review on scholarship assessing experiential learning effectiveness. Simulation & Gaming, 35, 270-293. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Kaplan, R., Norton, D. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Kickmeier-Rust, M., Hillemann, E., Albert, D. (2014). Gamification and smart, competence-centered feedback: Promising experiences in the classroom. International Journal of Serious Games, 1(1). Retrieved from http://journal.seriousgamessociety.org/index.php?journal=IJSG&page=article&op=view&path%5B%5D=7 Google Scholar | |
|
Kolb, A., Kolb, D. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Journal of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193-212. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Lovelace, K., Eggers, F., Dyck, L. (2016). I do and I understand: Assessing the utility of web-based management simulations to develop critical thinking skills. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 15, 100-121. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mottner, S. (2009). Experimenting with team norms in a marketing simulation. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 15, 1-13. Google Scholar | |
|
Myers, S. D. (2010). Experiential learning and consumer behavior: An exercise in consumer decision making. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 17, 23-27. Google Scholar | |
|
Petridis, P., Hadjicosta, K., Guang, V., Dunwell, I., Baines, T., Bigdeli, A., Bustinza, O., Uren, V. (2015). State-of-the-art in Business Games. International Journal of Serious Games, 2(1), 55-69. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Reiners, T., Wood, L. C. (2015). Gamification in education and business. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Stephen, J., Parente, D. H., Brown, R. C. (2002). Seeing the forest and the trees: Balancing functional and integrative knowledge using large scale simulations in capstone business strategy classes. Journal of Management Education, 26, 164-193. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Vogel, J. J., Vogel, D. S., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C. A., Muse, K., Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34, 229-243. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Wolfe, J. (1997). The effectiveness of business games in strategic management course work. Simulation & Gaming, 28, 360-376. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
