Simulation games have become widespread in business courses, yet the understanding of their learning effects remains limited. The effectiveness of using simulation in marketing classes is not uniform, and not all students welcome it to the same extent. Drawing on a survey among 173 students engaged in a simulation game as part of a course in a 2-year business graduate program, we employ “expectation–confirmation theory” and the “unified theory of acceptance and use of technology” to develop a model to investigate the relation between Learner Satisfaction and Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy with a marketing simulation game. In addition, we examine the influence of Age, Gender, Course Type, Course Stage, and Recalled Performance. We report that Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy drive Learner Satisfaction. We also find Recalled Performance of students to be related to Learner Satisfaction. We discuss the implications of our results for the use of marketing simulation games in business programs in relation to experiential learning theory linking Learner Satisfaction to learning outcomes. In light of our results, instructors can affect the learning experience from simulation games by acting on Performance Expectancy and Effort Expectancy as antecedents of Learner Satisfaction.

Alpert, F. (1993). Large-scale simulation in marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 15(2), 30-35.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Amstutz, A. E. (1967). Computer simulation of competitive market response. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Balderson, F. E., Hogatt, A. (1964). Simulating market processes. In Day, R. L. (Ed.), Marketing models (pp. 29-39). Scranton, PA: International Textbook.
Google Scholar
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25, 351-370.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bobot, L. (2010). Teaching sales and negotiation with combining computer-based simulation and case discussions. Marketing Education Review, 20, 115-122.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brennan, R., Vos, L. (2013). Effects of participation in a simulation game on marketing students’ numeracy and financial skills. Journal of Marketing Education, 35, 259-270.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Buche, M. W., Davis, L. R., Vician, C. (2012). Does technology acceptance affect e-learning in a non-technology-intensive course? Journal of Information Systems Education, 23, 41-50.
Google Scholar
Chapman, K. J., Sorge, C. L. (1999). Can a simulation help achieve course objectives? An exploratory study investigating differences among instructional tools. Journal of Education for Business, 74, 225-230.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Churchill, G. A., Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 491-504.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Clark, R., Yates, K., Early, S., Moulton, K. (2009). An analysis of the failure of electronic media and discovery based learning: Evidence for the performance benefits of guided training methods. In Foshay, W. R., Silber, K. H. (Eds.), Handbook of training and improving workplace performance: Instructional design and delivery (pp. 263-297). Washington, DC: International Society for Performance Development.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cook, R., Owens-Swift, C. (2006). The pedagogical efficacy of a sales management simulation. Marketing Education Review, 16(3), 37-46.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cronin, J. J., Taylor, S. (1992). A measuring service quality: A reexamination and extension. Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Cyert, R. M., March, J. G., Moore, C. C. (1963). A specific price and output model. In Cyert, R. M., March, J. G. (Eds.), A behavioral theory of firm (pp. 128-148). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Davis, F. D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475-487.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Doyle, D., Brown, F. W. (2000). Using a business simulation to teach applied skills: The benefits and the challenges of using student teams from multiple countries. Journal of European Industrial Training, 24, 330-336.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Drea, J. T., Tripp, C., Struenkel, K. (2005). An assessment of the effectiveness of an in-class game on marketing students’ perceptions and learning outcomes. Marketing Education Review, 15(1), 25-33.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Elam, E. R. L., Spotts, H. E. (2004). Achieving marketing curriculum integration. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 50-65.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Faria, A. J. (2001). The changing nature of business simulation/gaming research: A brief history. Simulation & Gaming, 32, 97-110.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Faria, A. J. (2006). History, current usage, and learning from marketing simulation games: A detailed literature review. Proceeding of the Marketing Management Associations, 138-139. Retrieved from http://www.mmaglobal.org/publications/Proceedings/2006-MMA-Fall-Educators-Conference-Proceedings.pdf
Google Scholar
Faria, A. J., Wellington, W. J. (2004). A survey of simulation game users, former-users, and never-users. Simulation & Gaming, 35, 178-207.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Fenwick, G. D., Neal, D. J. (2001). Effect of gender composition on group performance. Gender, Work & Organization, 8, 205-225.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Forrester, J. W. (1959, March-April). Advertising: A problem in industrial dynamics. Harvard Business Review, 37, 100-110.
Google Scholar | ISI
Garber, L. I., Hyatt, E. M., Boya, U., Ausherman, B. (2012). The association between learning and learning style in instructional marketing games. Marketing Education Review, 22, 167-183.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Giese, J. L., Cote, J. A. (2000). Defining customer satisfaction. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 1(1), 1-22.
Google Scholar
Glazer, R., Winer, R. S., Steckel, J. H. (1987). Group process and decision performance in a simulated marketing environment. Journal of Business Research, 15, 545-557.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gupta, A., Singh, K., Verma, R. (2010). Simulation: An effective marketing tool. International Journal of Computer Applications, 4(11), 8-12.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Harrigan, P., Hulbert, B. (2011). How can marketing academics serve marketing practice? The new marketing DNA as a model for marketing education. Journal of Marketing Education, 33, 253-272.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hoover, J. D., Whitehead, C. (1975). An experiential-cognitive methodology in the first course in management: Some preliminary results. Simulation Games and Experiential Learning in Action, 2, 23-25.
Google Scholar
Hossain, M. H., Quaddus, M. (2011). Expectation-Confirmation Theory in information system research: A review and analysis. In Dwivedi, Y. K., Wade, M. R., Schneberger, S. L. (Eds.), Information systems theory, explaining and predicting our digital society (pp. 441-469). New York, NY: Springer.
Google Scholar
Kaenzig, R., Hyatt, E., Anderson, S. (2007). Gender differences in college of business educational experiences. Journal of Education for Business, 83, 95-100.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kaplowitz, L., Block, S. (1998). Gender-related group dynamics in problem-based learning: A retrospective study. Academic Psychiatry, 22, 197-202.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Kolb, A. Y., Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193-212.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Kotler, P. (1965). Competitive strategies for new product marketing over the product life cycle. Management Science, 12, 104-119.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Larréché, J-C. (1987). On simulations in business education and research. Journal of Business Research, 15, 559-571.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
LaTour, S. A., Peat, N. (1979). Conceptual and methodological issues in consumer satisfaction research. Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 431-437.
Google Scholar
Laughlin, J. L., Hite, R. E. (1993). Game and simulation effectiveness in marketing education: An experimental investigation. Journal of Marketing Education, 15, 39-46.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Laverie, D. (2006). In-class active cooperative learning: A way to build knowledge and skills in marketing courses. Marketing Education Review, 16(2), 59-76.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lowe, B., D’Alessandro, S., Winzar, H., Laffey, D., Collier, W. (2013). The use of Web 2.0 technologies in marketing classes: Key drivers of student acceptance. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 12, 412-422.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Murray, J. P., Dacin, P. A. (1996). Cognitive moderators of negative-emotion effects: Implications for understanding media context. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 439-447.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 460-469.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Oliver, R. L. (1996). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J-L., Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Ranchhod, A., Gurau, C., Trivedi, R., Euripides, L. (2014). Evaluating the educational effectiveness of simulation games: A value-generation model. Information Science, 264, 75-90.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Shen, J., Eder, L. (2009). Intentions to use virtual words in education. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20, 225-233.
Google Scholar
Shycon, H. M., Maffie, R. B. (1960, November-December). Simulation tool for better distribution. Harvard Business Review, 4, 21-41.
Google Scholar
Smith, L. W., Van Doren, D. C. (2004). The reality-based learning method: A simple method for keeping teaching activities relevant and effective. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 66-74.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Smith-Lovin, L., Brody, C. (1989). Interruptions in group discussions: The effects of gender and group composition. American Sociological Review, 54, 425-435.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Soper, D. S. (2016). A-priori sample size calculator for hierarchical multiple regression [Software]. Retrieved from http://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
Google Scholar
Spreng, R. A., Mackoy, R. D. (1996). An empirical examination of a model of perceived service quality and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing, 72, 201-214.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Taylor, S. A., Baker, T. L. (1994). An assessment of the relationship between service quality and customer satisfaction in the formation of consumers’ purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 70, 163-178.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tonks, D. G. (2012). Using marketing simulation for teaching and learning: Reflections on an evolution. Active Learning in Higher Education, 3, 177-194.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Tonks, D. G. (2005). The processing and pedagogy of marketing simulations. Marketing Review, 5, 371-382.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Tse, D. K., Wilton, P. C. (1988). Models of consumer satisfaction formation: An extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 204-212.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Van Hiel, A., Schittekatte, M. (1998). Information exchange in context: Effects of gender composition of group, accountability, and intergroup perception on group decision making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 2049-2067.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Venkatesh, V., Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 273-315.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186-204.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, F. D., Davis, G. B. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Vos, L., Brennan, R. (2010). Marketing simulation games: Student and lecturer perspectives. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 28, 882-897.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Walker, I., Tsarenko, Y., Wagstaff, P., Powell, I., Steel, M. (2009). The development of competent marketing professionals. Journal of Marketing Education, 31, 253-263.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Wellington, W. J., Faria, A. J. (1993). An investigation of the relationship between simulation play, performance level, and recency of play on exam scores. Development in Business Simulation & Experience Exercises, 18, 111-117.
Google Scholar
Wellington, W. J., Faria, A. J. (1996). Team cohesion, player attitude, and performance expectations in simulation. Simulation & Games, 27, 23-40.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Wilson, K. A., Bedwell, W. L., Lazzara, E. H., Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Estock, J., . . . Conkey, C. (2009). Relationships between games attributes and learning outcomes: Review and research proposals. Simulating & Gaming, 40, 217-266.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Wolfe, J., Roberts, C. R. (1993). A further study of the external validity of business games: Five year peer group indicators. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 21-33.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wright, L. K., Bitner, M. J., Zeithaml, V. A. (1994). Paradigm shifts in business education: Using active learning to deliver services marketing content. Journal of Marketing Education, 16(3), 5-19.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Wu, X., Gao, Y. (2011). Applying the extended technology acceptance model to the use of clickers in student learning: Some evidence from macroeconomics classes. American Journal of Business Education, 4(7), 43-50.
Google Scholar
Young, M.R., Klemz, B.R., Murphy, J.W. (2003). Enhancing learning outcomes: The effects of instructional technology, learning styles, instructional methods, and student behavior. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(2), 130-143.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JMD-article-ppv for $36.00