Planning to Coordinate and Coordinating the Plan: Evidence From Local Governments

First Published December 1, 2005 Research Article

Authors

Louisiana State University
by this author
,
University of Central Florida
by this author
First Published Online: July 26, 2016

The coordination of planning among local governments is an important strategy for addressing many challenges that go beyond geographical or political jurisdictions such as those related to transportation congestion, educational performance, public safety, and the environment. This study examines the use of planning coordination and factors associated with its use. Based on a national survey and in-depth interviews among jurisdictions with populations of more than 50,000, the study finds that about 40% of jurisdictions frequently use coordinated, comprehensive plans, most commonly in public safety, traffic congestion, transit planning, and economic development. Among respondents, 78.7% agree or strongly agree that coordination with other jurisdictions and organizations is important in solving complex community problems. The perceived effectiveness of other jurisdictions and the presence of a revitalized management work culture are important factors associated with the increased use of such planning.

Aberbach, J. , & Rockman, B. (2000). In the web of politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Google Scholar
Bellone, C. , & Goerl, G. (1992). Reconciling public entrepreneurship and democracy. Public Administration Review, 52(2), 130-145.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Berman, E. , & Werther, W. (1996). Broad-based consensus building. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(3), 61-72.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bretschneider, S. , & Gorr, W. (1992). Economic, organizational, and political influences on biases in forecasting state sales tax receipts. International Journal of Forecasting, 7, 457-466.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Brooks, A. (2002). Can nonprofit management help answer public management's “big questions?” Public Administration Review, 62, 259-260.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bryson, J. (1992). Leadership for the common good. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Bryson, J. (1995). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Caves, F. , & Cullingsworth, B. (2003). Planning in the USA: Policies, issues and processes. Boston: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Chrislip, D. , & Larson, C. (1996). Collaborative leadership: How citizens and civic leaders can make a difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Cohen, S. (2002). The effective public manager: Achieving public success in a changing government. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Dees, J. , Emerson, J. , & Economy, P. (2001). Enterprising nonprofits. New York: John Wiley.
Google Scholar
DeLeeuw, E. (1999). Healthy cities: Urban social entrepreneurship for health. Health Promotion International, 14, 261-269.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Doig, J. ,& Hargrove, E. (1987). Leadership and innovation: Abiographical perspective on entrepreneurs in government. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Donald, C. , Lyons, T. ,& Tribbey, R. (2001). Apartnership for strategic planning and management in a public organization. Public Performance and Management Review, 25(2), 176-193.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Drayton, W. (2002). The citizen sector: Becoming as competitive and entrepreneurial as business. California Management Journal, 1(1), 3-5.
Google Scholar
Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper and Row.
Google Scholar
Duhl, L. (1995). The social entrepreneurship of change. New York: Pace University Press.
Google Scholar
Dunn, D. ,& Legge, J. (2002). Politics and administration in USlocal governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12, 401-422.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Fredrickson, G. (1982). The recovery of civicism in public administration. Public Administration Review, 42(1), 501-508.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Fredrickson, G. , & Hart, D. (1995). The public service and the patriotism of benevolence. Public Administration Review, 45(1), 547-554.
Google Scholar
French, P. E. ,& Folz, D. H. (2004). Executive behavior and decision making in small U.S. cities. American Reviewof Public Administration, 34(1), 52-66.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hart, D. (1984). The virtuous citizen, the honorable bureaucrat and “public administration.” Public Administration Review, 44(1), 111-120.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hays, S. , & Kearney, R. (2001). Anticipated changes in human resource management: Views from the field. Public Administration Review, 61, 585-597.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Herman, R. ,& Redina, D. (2001). Donor reactions to commercial activities of nonprofit organizations: An American case study. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 12(2), 157-169.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Holley, L. , Dufner, D. , & Reed, B. (2004). Strategic information systems planning (SISP) in U.S. county governments: Will the real SISP model please stand up? Public Performance and Management Review, 27(3), 102-126.
Google Scholar
Huggins, R. (2000). The success and failure of policy-implemented inter-firm network initiatives: Motivations, processes and structure. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(1), 11-35.
Google Scholar
International City Management Association . (2004). Municipal yearbook: 2004. Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
Kearney, R. ,& Scavo, C. (2001). Reinventing government in reformed municipalities: Manager, mayor and council actions. Urban Affairs Review, 37(1), 43-66.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Keast, R. , Mandell, M. , Brown, K. , & Woolcock, G. (2004). Network structures: Working differently and changing expectations. Public Administration Review, 64, 363-377.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kelly, E. , & Becker, B. (2000). Community planning: An introduction to the comprehensive plan. Milldale, CT: Milldale Press.
Google Scholar
Kettl, D. (2000). The global public management revolution: A report on the transformation of governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Google Scholar
Kettl, D. (2003). Contingent coordination: Practical and theoretical puzzles for homeland security. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 253-277.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas alternatives and public policies(2nd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
Google Scholar
Klingner, D. , Nalbandian, J. , & Romzek, B. (2002). Politics, administration, and markets: Conflicting expectations and accountability. The American Review of Public Administration, 32(1), 117-144.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Ledbetter, C. (1997). The rise of the social entrepreneur. London: Viking.
Google Scholar
Lee, M. (2002). Non-profits and social entrepreneurship: Taking the good, avoiding the bad. PATimes, 25(8), 2-3.
Google Scholar
Lewis, E. (1980). Public entrepreneurship: Toward a theory of bureaucratic power. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Google Scholar
Melkers, J. ,& Willoughby, K. (1998). The state of the states: Performance-basedbudgeting requirements in 47 out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 66-73.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Morrish, W. , & Brown, C. (2000). Planning to stay. Washington, DC: Milkweed Editions.
Google Scholar
Mouritzen, P. , & Svara, J. (2002). Leadership at the apex: Politicians and administrators in Western local governments. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. (2003). Normative and instrumental perspectives on public participation: Citizen summits in Washington, DC. American Review of Public Administration, 33(2), 164-188.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Moynihan, D. , & Ingraham, P. (2003). Look for the silver lining: When performance based accountability systems work. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 469-490.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Orfield, M. , & Rusk, D. (1997). Metropolitics: A regional agenda for community and stability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Google Scholar
Osborne, D. ,& Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
Ostgaard, T. , & Birley, S. (1994). Personal networks and firm competitive strategy—A strategic or coincidental match? Journal of Business Venturing, 9(1), 281-305.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Page, S. (2004). Measuring accountability for results in interagency collaboratives. Public Administration Review, 64, 591-606.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Peters, B. , & Savoie, D. (2001). Governance in the twenty-first century: Revitalizing the public service. London: McGill-Queens University Press.
Google Scholar
Peters, T. (1997). The circle of innovation. New York: Vintage.
Google Scholar
Poister, T. , & Van Slyke, D. (2002). Strategic management innovation in state transportation departments. Public Productivity and Management Review, 26(1), 58-74.
Google Scholar
Prabhu, G. (1999). Social entrepreneurship leadership. Career Development International, 4(3), 140-145.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rainey, H. , & Steinbauer, P. (2002). Galloping elephants: Developing elements of a theory of effective government organizations. In R. Stillman (Ed.), Public administration: Concepts and cases(pp. 1-32). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Reis, T. (1999). Unleashing the new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A scan, synthesis and scenario for action. Battle Creek, MI: WK Kellogg Foundation.
Google Scholar
Rich, M. , Giles, M. ,& Stern, E. (2001). Collaborating to reduce poverty: Views from city halls and community based organizations. Urban Affairs Review, 37(2), 184-204.
Google Scholar
Roberts, A. (2004). Apartial revolution: The diplomatic ethos and transparency in intergovernmental organizations. Public Administration Review, 64, 408-422.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rusk, D. (2003). Cities without suburbs: A census 2000 update. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Press.
Google Scholar
Simmons, J. , & Simmons, S. (2004). Structural conflict in contemporary cities. The American Review of Public Administration, 34, 374-388.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Simon, H. (1998). Why public administration? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(1), 1-12.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sinclair, T. A. (2002). From community building to governing strangers: Reconceptualizing institutional relationships among governments, community organizations and individuals. American Review of Public Administration, 32, 312-312.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Svara, J. (2001). The myth of the dichotomy: Complementary of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 176-183.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Teisman, G. , & Klijn, E. (2002). Partnership agreements: Governmental rhetoric or governance scheme? Public Administration Review, 62, 749-753.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Thompson, J. , Alvy, G. , & Lees, A. (2000). Social entrepreneurship: A new look at the people and potential. Management Decision, 38, 338-348.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Timmons, J. (1989). The entrepreneurial mind. Boston: Brick House.
Google Scholar
Vigoda, E. , & Golembiewski, R. T. (2001). Citizenship behavior and the spirit of new managerialism: A theoretical framework and challenge for governance. American Review of Public Administration, 31, 273-295.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Visser, J. A. (2002). Understanding local government cooperation in urban regions: Toward a cultural model of interlocal relations. American Review of Public Administration, 32(1), 40-65.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Wheeland, C. (2003). Implementing a community-wide strategic plan: Rock Hill's empowering vision 10 years later. American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), 46-69.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Young, M. (1997, February 21). Do-gooders with savvy. New Statesman, p. 20-20.
Google Scholar

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

ARP-article-ppv for GBP29.00
ARP-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP351.92
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $421.66