Sexual function in patients with endometriosis: a prospective case–control study in China
Abstract
Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Introduction
Methods
Study design and selection of patients
Data collection and statistical analysis
Data from medical charts
Survey procedure
Statistical methods
Results
Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants in the case and control groups
| Endometriosis group (n=77) | Control group (n=63) | χ2 | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 2.609 | 0.271 | ||
| 20–30 | 22 | 24 | ||
| 31–40 | 35 | 29 | ||
| 41–50 | 20 | 10 | ||
| Education | 4.779 | 0.084 | ||
| High school and below | 31 | 17 | ||
| College | 40 | 44 | ||
| Masters and above | 6 | 2 | ||
| Marital status | 0.435 | 0.509 | ||
| Married | 70 | 60 | ||
| Non-married | 7 | 3 | ||
| Fertility | 0.206 | 0.650 | ||
| Fertile | 46 | 40 | ||
| Non-fertile | 31 | 23 |
Descriptive analysis of dimension scores of the FSFI
| Question number | Score range | Coefficient | Lowest score | Highest score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual desire | 1–2 | 1–5 | 0.6 | 1.2 | 5.4 |
| Sexual arousal | 3–6 | 0–5 | 0.3 | 0 | 6.0 |
| Vaginal lubrication | 7–10 | 0–5 | 0.3 | 0 | 6.0 |
| Orgasm | 11–13 | 0–5 | 0.4 | 0 | 6.0 |
| Satisfaction | 14–16 | 0 (1)–5 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 6.0 |
| Sexual pain | 17–19 | 0–5 | 0.4 | 0 | 6.0 |
| Total score | – | – | – | 2.8 | 34.5 |
Correlations of the dimensions of the FSFI
| Dimension | Sexual arousal | Vaginal lubrication | Orgasm | Satisfaction | Sexual pain | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual desire | 1 | |||||
| Sexual arousal | 0.640 | 1 | ||||
| Vaginal lubrication | 0.457 | 0.696 | 1 | |||
| Orgasm | 0.458 | 0.674 | 0.737 | 1 | ||
| Satisfaction | 0.359 | 0.569 | 0.639 | 0.642 | 1 | |
| Sexual pain | 0.304 | 0.520 | 0.787 | 0.630 | 0.541 | 1 |
Comparison of dimension scores between the two groups
| Endometriosis group | Control group | Z value | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (P25, P75) | M (P25, P75) | |||
| Sexual desire | 3.0 (2.4, 3.6) | 3.0 (2.4, 3.6) | −1.139 | 0.255 |
| Sexual arousal | 3.6 (2.4, 3.9) | 3.6 (3.3, 4.5) | −2.916 | 0.004 |
| Vaginal lubrication | 4.8 (4.2, 5.4) | 5.1 (4.5, 5.7) | −1.535 | 0.125 |
| Orgasm | 4.0 (3.2, 5.2) | 4.4 (4.0, 4.8) | −1.285 | 0.199 |
| Satisfaction | 4.8 (4.0, 5.3) | 5.2 (4.8, 5.6) | −2.045 | 0.041 |
| Sexual pain | 4.8 (3.6, 5.8) | 5.2 (4.4, 6.0) | −2.375 | 0.018 |
| Total score | 25.5 (21.7, 28.3) | 26.7 (23.6, 28.7) | −1.824 | 0.068 |
Comparison of sexual function between the two groups at different ages
| Age group (years) | Components of the FSFI | Endometriosis group | Control group | Z value | t value | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M (P25, P75)/mean ± SD | M (P25, P75)/mean ± SD | |||||
| 20–30 | Sexual desire | 3.6 (2.4, 4.2) | 3.0 (2.4, 3.6) | −0.727 | 0.467 | |
| Sexual arousala | 3.8±1.1 | 3.6 (3.3, 4.5) | −0.222 | 0.824 | ||
| Vaginal lubricationb | 5.4 (4.8, 6.0) | 5.1±0.6 | −0.891 | 0.373 | ||
| Orgasm | 4.6 (4.0, 5.2) | 4.4 (3.6, 4.8) | −0.765 | 0.444 | ||
| Satisfaction | 5.2 (4.8, 5.7) | 5.2 (4.8, 5.9) | −0.146 | 0.884 | ||
| Sexual painb | 5.2 (3.9, 5.7) | 4.9±0.9 | −0.045 | 0.964 | ||
| Total scorea,b | 26.4±5.5 | 26.3±2.7 | 0.102 | 0.919 | ||
| 31–40 | Sexual desire | 3.0 (2.4, 3.6) | 3.0 (2.4, 3.6) | −1.259 | 0.208 | |
| Sexual arousal | 3.0 (2.4, 3.6) | 3.6 (3.5, 4.4) | −3.118 | 0.002 | ||
| Vaginal lubricationb | 4.5 (3.6, 5.4) | 5.0±0.7 | −1.818 | 0.069 | ||
| Orgasmb | 4.0 (3.2, 4.8) | 4.4±0.8 | −1.558 | 0.119 | ||
| Satisfaction | 4.8 (4.0, 5.4) | 4.8 (4.4, 5.6) | −1.443 | 0.149 | ||
| Sexual pain | 4.8 (3.6, 6.0) | 5.2 (4.8, 6.0) | −2.102 | 0.036 | ||
| Total scoreb | 25.3 (20.1, 27.5) | 26.3±3.1 | −1.882 | 0.060 | ||
| 41–50 | Sexual desire | 3.0 (2.4, 3.6) | 3.6 (2.9, 3.6) | −1.549 | 0.121 | |
| Sexual arousalb | 3.3 (2.4, 3.9) | 3.8±1.0 | −1.529 | 0.126 | ||
| Vaginal lubricationb | 4.5 (3.7, 5.3) | 4.8±0.8 | −0.797 | 0.426 | ||
| Orgasmb | 4.0 (3.3, 5.1) | 4.6±0.9 | −1.379 | 0.168 | ||
| Satisfactiona,b | 4.0±1.4 | 4.8±1.1 | −1.543 | 0.134 | ||
| Sexual paina | 3.9±2.0 | 5.6 (3.6, 6.0) | −1.693 | 0.090 | ||
| Total scoreb | 23.1 (19.8, 28.3) | 26.6±4.3 | −1.584 | 0.113 |
Discussion
Conclusion
Relevance to clinical practice
Declaration of conflicting interest
Funding
ORCID iD
References
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Journal of International Medical Research.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 1398
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 13 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 7
- Validation of the adapted female sexual function index among Chinese c...
- Impact of endometriosis on female sexual function: an updated systemat...
- Endometriosis decreases female sexual function and increases pain seve...
- New Understanding of Diagnosis, Treatment and Prevention of Endometrio...
- The State of Health and the Quality of Life in Women Suffering from En...
- A Study on the Correlation Between Quality of Life and Unhealthy Emoti...
- Endometriosis—A Multifaceted Problem of a Modern Woman
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
View options
PDF/ePub
View PDF/ePubGet access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
