Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 12, 2015

The Treatment Perspectives of Mentally Ill Offenders in Medium- and High-Secure Forensic Settings in Flanders

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in mentally ill offenders’ (MIOs) treatment experiences in forensic settings. This study focuses on the treatment perspectives of MIOs in treatment as well as in prison settings in Flanders. Seventeen MIOs were interviewed about the treatment they received. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis to derive key themes while acknowledging the individuality of the participants’ experiences. Treatment perspectives of MIOs in both settings revolved around similar themes, including “good” staff and privacy. However, their views differed on two themes: MIOs in treatment settings reported on feelings of lacking control and experiencing too much pressure, whereas MIOs in prison settings reported the opposite. The positive experiences in prison settings may complicate the transition from prison to a forensic treatment setting. The study further underscores the major challenge to create more opportunities for MIOs to meet their needs of self-determination in secure forensic treatment settings.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Andrews D. A., Bonta J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Anderson Publishing.
Bailey J., MacCulloch M. (1992). Characteristics of 112 cases discharged directly to the community from a new special hospital and some comparisons of performance. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 3, 91-112.
Barnao M., Robertson P., Ward T. (2010). Good Lives Model applied to forensic population. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 17, 202-217.
Björkman T., Hansson L., Svensson B., Berglung I. (1995). What is important in psychiatric outpatient care? Quality of care from the patient’s perspective. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 7, 355-362.
Boers A., Vandevelde S., Soyez V., De Smet S., To W. T. (2011). Het zorgaanbod voor geïnterneerden in België. Panopticon, 2, 17-38.
Bouman Y. H. A., de Ruiter C., Rooney J. (2009). Recent life events and subjective well-being of personality disordered forensic outpatients. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32, 348-354.
Braun V., Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
Casselman J. (2000). Forensisch psychiatrische eenheden: Nu of nooit! Tijdschrift Klinische Psychologie, 30, 148-152.
Coffey M. (2006). Researching service user views in forensic mental health: A literature review. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 17, 73-107.
Cosyns P., D’Hondt C., Janssen D., Maes E., Verellen R. (2007). Geïnterneerden in België: De cijfers. Panopticon, 28, 46-61.
Cosyns P., Van Peteghem P., Raes M., Sabbe B. G. C. (2006). De forensische psychiatriein Vlaanderen op een keerpunt? Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie, 48, 511-513.
Deci E. L., Ryan R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.
De Smet S., Van Hecke N., Verté D., Broekaert E., Ryan D., Vandevelde S. (2014). Treatment and control: A qualitative study of older mentally ill offenders on their detention and care trajectory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.
Faulkner A., Morris B. (2003). User involvement in forensic mental health research and development. Liverpool, UK: NHS National Programme on Forensic Mental Health Research and Development.
Fortune C.-A., Ward T., Polaschek D. L. L. (2014). The Good Lives Model and therapeutic environments in forensic settings. Therapeutic Communities, 35, 95-104.
Hoge S. K., Lidz C. W., Eisenberg M., Monahan J., Bennett N., Gardner W.,. . .Roth L. H. (1998). Family, clinicians, and patient perceptions of coercion in mental hospital admission: A comparative study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 21, 131-146.
Johansson H., Eklund M. (2003). Patients’ opinion on what constitutes good psychiatric care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 17, 339-346.
Koivisto K., Janhonen S., Vaisanen L. (2004). Patients’ experience of being helped in an inpatient setting. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 11, 268-275.
Lebow J. (1982). Consumer satisfaction with mental health treatment. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 244-259.
Lidz C., Hoge S., Gardner W., Bennett N., Monahan J., Mulvey E., Roth L. (1995). Perceived coercion in mental hospital admission. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 1034-1040.
Morrison P., Burnard P., Philips C. (1996). Patient satisfaction in a forensic unit. Journal of Mental Health, 5, 369-377.
Naudts K. H., Cosyns P., MCinerny T., Audenaert K., Van Den Eynde F., Van Heeringen C. (2005). Editorial: Belgium and its internees: A problem for human rights and a stimulus for service change. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 15, 148-153.
Patton M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Raphael W., Peers V. (1972). Psychiatric hospitals viewed by their patients. London, England: King’s Fund.
Robertson P., Barnao M., Ward T. (2011). Rehabilitation frameworks in forensic mental health. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 472-484.
Rogers A., Pilgrim D., Lacey R. (1993). Experiencing psychiatry: Users’ view of services. London, England: Macmillan.
Ross E. C., Polaschek D. L. L., Ward T. (2008). The therapeutic alliance: A theoretical revision for offender rehabilitation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 462-480.
Ryan S., Moore E., Taylor P. J., Wilkinson E., Lingiah T., Christmas M. (2002). The voice of detainees in a high security setting on services for people with personality disorder. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 12, 254-268.
Sainsbury L., Krishnan G., Evans C. (2004). Motivating factors for male forensic patients with personality disorder. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 14, 29-38.
Schroeder R. (2013). The seriously mentally ill older adult: Perceptions of the patient–provider relationship. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 49, 30-40.
Shattell M. M., McAllister S., Hogan B., Thomas S. P. (2006). “She took my hand, help me out”: Mental health patients’ experiences of being understood. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 20, 234-241.
Shattell M. M., Starr S. S., Thomas S. P. (2007). “Take my hand, help me out”: Mental health service recipients’ experience of the therapeutic relationship. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 16, 274-284.
Skelly C. (1994a). The experience of special hospital patients in regional secure units. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 1, 171-177.
Skelly C. (1994b). From special hospital to regional secure unit: A qualitative study of the problems experienced by patients. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20, 1056-1063.
Sullivan M. (2003). The new subjective medicine: Taking the participant’s point of view on health care. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1595-1604.
To W. T., Vandevelde S., Soyez V., De Smet S., Boers A., Vanheule S. (2014). Treatment perspectives on interned mentally ill offenders in a forensic psychiatric center (FPC): A Delphi study on experts’ opinions. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 61-77.
Vanhaelemeesch D., Vander Beken D., Vandevelde S. (2014). Punishment at home: Offenders’ experience with electronic monitoring. European Journal of Criminology, 11, 273-287.
Ward T., Brown M. (2004). The Good Lives Model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 243-257.
Ward T., Maruna S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm. London, England: Routlegde.
Ward T., Steward C. A. (2003). Good lives and the rehabilitation of sexual offenders. In Ward T., Laws D. R., Hudson S. M. (Eds.), Sexual deviance: Issues and controversies (pp. 21-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Ward T., Yates P. M., Willis G. M. (2012). The Good Lives Model and the Risk Need Responsivity Model: A critical response to Andrews, Bonta, and Wormith (2011). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 94-110.
Weinstein R. (1979). Patient attitudes towards mental hospitalization: A review of quantitative research. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 13, 237-258.
Wood H., Thorpe L., Read S., Eastwood A., Lindley M. (2008). Service user satisfaction in a low secure forensic learning disability unit? Mental Health and Learning Disability Research and Practice, 5, 176-191.
Young D. (2003). Co-occurring disorders among jail inmates: Bringing the treatment gap. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 3, 63-85.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 12, 2015
Issue published: December 2015

Keywords

  1. mentally ill offenders
  2. treatment
  3. service user perceptions
  4. forensic mental health

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2015.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 25583981

Authors

Affiliations

Wing Ting To
Stijn Vanheule
Ghent University, Belgium
Stefaan De Smet
University College Ghent, Belgium
Stijn Vandevelde
Ghent University, Belgium

Notes

Wing Ting To, Faculty of Education, Health and Social Work, University College Ghent, Voskenslaan 362, BE-9000 Ghent, Belgium. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1203

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 14 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 14

  1. Quality of life, wellbeing, recovery, and progress for older forensic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Culturally Sensitive Forensic Mental Healthcare for Racialized People ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Voices to be heard: Understanding family perspectives in forensic care...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Forensic psychiatry in times of COVID-19: a qualitative study into the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Totalitarian approaches to risk and the banality of harm in secure and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Are Mentally Disordered Offenders Admitted to Appropriate Secure Setti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Exploring the Experiences of Male Forensic Inpatients’ Relationships w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. What Do Patients Find Restrictive About Forensic Mental Health Service...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Crushed by the Belgian system: Lived experiences of forensic care traj...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. The bumpy road to change: a retrospective qualitative study on formerl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Recovery of Offenders Formerly Labeled as Not Criminally Responsible: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  12. Recovery, desistance, and the role of procedural justice in working al...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Experiences of restrictiveness in forensic psychiatric care: Systemati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Social climate in forensic mental health settings: A systematic review...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text