Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online November 11, 2020

Current trends and future directions in quantitative geodiversity assessment

Abstract

Geodiversity assessment is recent and is passing through a stage of methodological development and consolidation. With rapid environmental change, improving the developmental states of geodiversity assessment is of paramount importance. A scientometric analysis is presented to identify knowledge gaps, current trends and avenues for future research in quantitative geodiversity assessment literature. The study is categorised into three areas of analysis: (a) methodological intentions of geodiversity assessment, (b) current trends in geodiversity assessment methods and (c) current geographic trends. A ranking tool was developed to determine whether the current methodological intentions of geodiversity assessments trend towards combined geodiversity and biodiversity assessments or towards the independent assessment of geodiversity. Results showed that about 50% of publications independently assessed geodiversity with no consideration for biodiversity, 32% discussed or reviewed geodiversity by mentioning potential links to biodiversity and 12% more strongly linked geodiversity assessment to biodiversity assessment. Tools used by scholars to determine geodiversity values varied from statistical through to the more frequently adopted geographic information systems (GIS) and spatial analytical software approaches. Study sites selected for geodiversity assessments were predominantly terrestrial at the state-wide scale. Marine assessments, or seabed geodiversity, were mostly absent from the literature, with only two publications found. Brazil in South America had many geodiversity assessments and European scholars have played crucial roles in the development of quantitative geodiversity assessment in recent years. Subsequent research will benefit from developing a unified geodiversity assessment approach, reaching a consensus on an accepted definition and standardising the geodiversity concept, broadening research site environment types and developing strategies to promote further international and intranational collaboration.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Althaus F, Hill N, Ferrari R, et al. (2015) A standardised vocabulary for identifying benthic biota and substrata from underwater imagery: The CATAMI classification scheme. PLoS ONE 10(10).
Araujo AM, Pereira DI (2018) A new methodological contribution for the geodiversity assessment: Applicability to Ceara State (Brazil). Geoheritage 10(4): 591–605.
Argyriou AV, Sarris A, Teeuw RM (2016) Using geoinformatics and geomorphometrics to quantify the geodiversity of Crete, Greece. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 51: 47–59.
Australian Heritage Commission (2002) Australian Natural Heritage Charter, 2nd ed. Australian Heritage Commission, Canberra.
Bailey JJ, Boyd DS, Field R (2018) Models of upland species’ distributions are improved by accounting for geodiversity. Landscape Ecology 33(12): 2071–2087.
Barnosky AD, Hadley EA, Bascompte J, et al. (2012) Approaching a state shift in earth’s biosphere. Nature 486(7401) 52–58.
Belgiu M (2015) Countries WGS84. Available at: www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=a21fdb46d23e4ef896f31475217cbb08 (accessed 2 January 2020).
Benito-Calvo A, Perez-Gonzalez A, Magri O, et al. (2009) Assessing regional geodiversity: the Iberian Peninsula. Earth Surface Processes and Lanfrosm 34(10): 1433–1445.
Bétard F, Peulvast J-P (2019) Geodiversity hotspots: Concept, method and cartographic application for geoconservation purposes at a regional scale. Environmental Management 63(6): 822–834.
Bétard F, Peulvast J-P, de Oliveira Magalhães A, et al. (2018) Araripe Basin: A major geodiversity hotspot in Brazil. Geoheritage 10(4): 543–558.
Brilha J (2005) Geological Heritage and Geoconservation: Conservation of Nature in its Geological Strand. Palimage Editores, Viseu.
Brilha J (2015) Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: A review. Geoheritage 8(2): 119–134.
Brilha J, Gray M, Pereira D, et al. (2018) Geodiversity: An integrative review as a contribution to the sustainable management of the whole of nature. Environmental Science and Policy 86: 19–28.
Brocx M, Semeniuk V (2007) Geoheritage and geoconservation – History, defintion, scope and scale. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia 90: 53–87.
Burek C, Potter J (2006) Local geodiversity action plans. setting the context for geological conservation. English Nature Research Reports.
Burnett M, August P, Brown J, et al. (1998) The influence of geomorphological heterogeneity on biodiversity. A patch-scale perspective. Conservation Biology 12(2): 363–370.
Canţîr A, Bunduc T (2017) Assessment of the geomorphological processes in the lower Bic Plane, Republic of Moldova. Lucrările Seminarului Geografic” Dimitrie Cantemir” 45: 45–54.
Carcavilla L, Duran J, Lopez-Martinez J (2007) Geodiversidad: concepto y relación con el patrimonio geológico. Geo-Temas 10: 1299–1303.
Ceballos G, Ehrlich PR, Dirzo R (2017) Biological annihilation via the ongoing sixth mass extinction signaled by vertebrate population losses and declines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(30): E6089–E6096.
Chelariu C, Hapciuc O-E (2017) Geodiversity assessment of Moldova catchment in the mountain area. Lucrările Seminarului Geografic “Dimitrie Cantemir” 45: 5–14.
Comer PJ, Pressey RL, Hunter ML, et al. (2015) Incorporating geodiversity into conservation decisions. Conservation Biology 29(3): 692–701.
Crofts R (2014) Promoting geodiversity: Learning lessons from biodiversity. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 125(3): 263–266.
da Silva JMF, Santos LJC, Oka-Fiori C (2019) Spatial correlation analysis between topographic parameters for defining the geomorphometric diversity index: Application in the environmental protection area of the Serra da Esperança (state of Paraná, Brazil). Environmental Earth Sciences 78(12): 356. DOI:10.1007/s12665-019-8357-2.
Díaz-Martínez E (2011) Typology of heritage: where does geoheritage fit in? Forum GeoReg, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France, 23–27 October 2011, ‘Résumés/Abstracts’: 102.
Dirzo R, Young HS, Galetti M, et al. (2014) Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345: 401–406.
dos Santos DS, Mansur KL, de Arruda ER, et al. (2019) Geodiversity mapping and relationship with vegetation: A regional-scale application in SE Brazil. Geoheritage 11(2): 399–415.
dos Santos FM, Corte Bacci DC, Saad AR, et al. (2020) Geodiversity index weighted by multivariate statistical analysis. Applied Geomatics 12(3): 361–370.
Dowling R (2017) Geoparks – A vehicle for fostering community based, sustainable, regional development in Northern Australia. Available at: www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=1bc20fbd-62b6-4a34-a9af-b5180046a5f0&subId=515536 (accessed 4 August 2020).
Eberhard R (1997) Pattern and Process: Towards a Regional Approach to National State Assessment of Geodiversity. Technical series 2. Australian Heritage Commission and Environment Forest Taskforce, Environment Australia, Canberra.
Erikstad L (1999) A Holistic Approach to Secure Geoconservation in Local Physical Planning. Proceedings of the conference Towards the Balanced Management and Conservation of the Geological heritage in the New Millennium. Geological Society of Spain, Madrid, 69–72.
European Commission (2020) What is Horizon 2020? Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en (accessed 27 February 2020).
Ferrer-Valero N, Hernández-Calvento L, Hernández-Cordero AI (2019) Insights of long-term geomorphological evolution of coastal landscapes in hot-spot oceanic islands. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 44(2): 565–580.
Fischer A, Bhakta D, Macmillan-Lawler M, et al. (2019) Existing global marine protected area network is not representative or comprehensive measured against seafloor geomorphic features and benthic habitats. Ocean and Coastal Management 167: 179–187.
Forte J (2014) Avaliação quantitativa da geodiversidade: Desenvolvimento de instrumentos metodológicos com aplicação ao ordenamento do território. Universidade do Minho.
Forte JP, Brilha J, Pereira DI, et al. (2018) Kernel density applied to the quantitative assessment of geodiversity. Geoheritage 10(2): 205–217.
Geoconservation Commission (2008) UK Geodiversity Action Plan (UK GAP). Available at: http://www.geoconservation.com (accessed 26 March 2020).
Glossary of Thompson (2008) Glossary of Thompson Scientific Terminology. The Thompson Corporation. Available at: http://science.thomsonreuters.com/support/patents/patinf/terms/ (accessed 21 January 2020).
Grandgirard V (1999) L’evaluation des geotopes. Geologia Insubrica 4: 59–66.
Gray M (2004) Geodiversity: valuing and conserving abiotic nature. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Gray M (2008) Geodiversity: The Origin and Evolution of a Paradigm. In: Burek and Prosser (eds) The History of Geoconservation Illustrated. Geological Society of London, 132.
Gray M (2013) Geodiversity: Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Nature. Chichester: Wiley.
Gray M (2019) Geodiversity, geoheritage and geoconservation for society. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks 7(4): 226–236.
He F, Wu N, Dong X, et al. (2020) Elevation, aspect, and local environment jointly determine diatom and macroinvertebrate diversity in the Cangshan Mountain, Southwest China. Ecological Indicators 108: 105618.
Hjort J, Luoto M (2010) Geodiversity of high-latitude landscapes in northern Finland. Geomorphology 115(1–2): 109–116.
Hjort J, Gordon J, Gray M, et al. (2015) Why geodiversity matters in valuing nature’s stage. Conservation Biology 29(3): 630–639.
Houshold I, Sharples C (2008) Geodiversity in the wilderness: A brief history of geoconservation in Tasmania. Geological Society of London 300: 257–272.
Ilic MM, Stojkovic S, Rundic L, et al. (2016) Application of the geodiversity index for the assessment of geodiversity in urban areas: An example of the Belgrade city area, Serbia. Geologia Croatica 69(3): 325–336.
Jackova K, Romportl D (2008) The relationship between geodiversity and habitat richness in Sumava National Park and Krivoklatsko Pla (Czech Republish): A quantitative analysis approach. Journal of Landscape Ecology 1: 23–38.
Jalalian M (2012) Writing an eye-catching and evocative abstract for a research article: A comprehensive and practical approach. Electronic Physician 4(3): 520–524.
Jenks GF (1967) The data model concept in statistical mapping. International Yearbook of Cartography 7: 186–190.
Kärnä O-M, Heino J, Grönroos M, et al. (2018) The added value of geodiversity indices in explaining variation of stream macroinvertebrate diversity. Ecological Indicators 94: 420–429. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.034.
Johansson C (2000) Geodiversity in Nordic Nature Conservation. Nordisk Ministerraad, Copenhagen.
Kaskela A (2017) Seabed landscapes of the Baltic Sea: Geological characterization of the seabed environment with spatial analysis techniques. Doctoral thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Kaskela AM, Kotilainen AT (2017) Seabed geodiversity in a glaciated shelf area, the Baltic Sea. Geomorphology 295: 419–435.
Kiernan K (1996) Conserving Geodiversity and Geoheritage: The Conservation of Glacial Landforms. Report to the Australian Heritage Commission.
Kiernan K (1997) The Conservation of Landforms of Coastal Origin: Conserving Tasmania’s Geodiversity and Geoheritage. Hobart, Tasmania: Forest Practices Board.
Kot R (2018) A comparison of results from geomorphological diversity evaluation methods in the Polish Lowland (Toruń Basin and Che\lmno Lakeland). Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography 118(1): 17–35.
Kot R, Leśniak K (2017) Impact of different roughness coefficients applied to relief diversity evaluation: Chełmno lakeland (Polish Lowland). Geografiska Annaler, Series A: Physical Geography 99(2): 102–114.
Kozlowski S (2004) Geodiversity. The concept and scope of geodiversity. Przeglad Geologiczny 52(8/2): 833–837.
Lausch A, Baade J, Bannehr L, et al. (2019) Linking remote sensing and geodiversity and their traits relevant to biodiversity—Part I: soil characteristics. Remote Sensing 11(20): 2356.
Leakey R, Lewin R (1996) The sixth extinction: patterns of life and the future of humankind, 1st ed. New York: Anchor Books.
Liumbruno G, Velati C, Pasqualetti P, et al. (2013) How to write a scientific manuscript for publication. Blood Transfusion 11(2): 217–226.
Manosso F (2012) Potencialidades da Paisagem na região da Serra do Cadeado-PR: Abordagem metodológica das relações entre a estrutura geoecológica, a geodiversidade e o geoturismo. Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Paraná, Brasil.
Manosso FC, de Nobrega MT (2016) Calculation of geodiversity from landscape units of the Cadeado Range region in Parana, Brazil. Geoheritage 8(3): 189–199.
Martinez-Grana AM, Goy JL, Cimarra C (2015) 2D to 3D geologic mapping transformation using virtual globes and flight simulators and their applications in the analysis of geodiversity in natural areas. Environmental Earth Sciences 73(12): 8023–8034.
Matthews T (2014) Integrating geodiversitiy and biodiversity conservation: Theoretical foundations and conservation recommendations in a European Union context. Geoheritage 6: 57–70.
Melelli L, Vergari F, Liucci L, et al. (2017) Geomorphodiversity index: Quantifying the diversity of landforms and physical landscape. Science of the Total Environment 584: 701–714.
Mooghali A, Alijani R, Karami N, et al. (2012) Scientometric analysis of the scientometric literature. International Journal of Information Science and Management 9(1): 19–31.
Muller A (2011) Géodiversité et diversité paysagère: évaluation de concepts spaciaux pour l’étude de la diversité dês milieus et paysages: application au site Natura 2000 Madres-Coronat (Pyrénées-Orientales, France). Université Toulouse le Mirail – Toulouse II, Karlsruher Institut fur Technologie: Political Science.
Najwer A, Borysiak J, Gudowicz J, et al. (2016) Geodiversity and biodiversity of the postglacial landscape (Dębnica River catchment, Poland). Quaestiones Geographicae 35(1): 5–28.
Naparus-Aljancic M, Patru-Stupariu I, Stupariu MS (2017) Multiscale wavelet-based analysis to detect hidden geodiversity. Progress in Physical Geography 41(5): 601–619.
Nieto L (2001) Geodiversity: proposed integrative definition. Boletin Geológico y Minero 112(2): 3–12.
Nichols W, Killingbeck K, August P (1998) The influence of geormorphological heterogeneity on biodiversity. A landscape perspective. Conservation Biology 12(2): 371–379.
Nobre da Silva ML, Leite do Nascimento MA, Mansur KL (2019) Quantitative assessments of geodiversity in the area of the Serido Geopark Project, Northeast Brazil: Grid and centroid analysis. Geoheritage 11(3): 1177–1186.
Nogrady B (2018) Australia cuts research funding for universities. Available at: www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07840-w (accessed 3 October 2020).
Orsi H (2011) Quantifying the geodiversity of a study area in the Great Hungarian Plain. Journal of Environmental Geography 4(1–4): 19–22.
Owens S (2015) Knowledge, Policy, and Expertise: The UK Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 1970–2011. Corby: Oxford University Press.
Ozsahin E (2017) Geodiversity assessment in the Ganos (Isiklar) Mount (NW Turkey). Environmental Earth Sciences 76(7): 271.
Parks K, Mulligan M (2010) On the relationship between a resource based measure of geodiversity and broad scale biodiversity patterns. Biodiversity and Conservation 19(9): 2751–2766.
Payne JL, Bush AM, Heim NA, et al. (2016) Ecological selectivity of the emerging mass extinction in the oceans. Science 353(6305): 1284–1286.
Pellitero R (2012) Geomorfología, paleoambiente cuaternario y geodiversidad en el macizo de Fuentes Carrionas-Montaña Palentina. Doctoral Thesis. Universidad de Valladolid, Espanha.
Pellitero R, Jose Gonzalez-Amuchastegui M, Ruiz-Flano P, et al. (2011) Geodiversity and geomorphosite assessment applied to a natural protected area: The Ebro and Rudron Gorges Natural Park (Spain). Geoheritage 3(3): 163–174.
Pellitero R, Manosso FC, Serrano E (2015) Mid- and large-scale geodiversity calculation in Fuentes Carrionas (NW Spain) and Serra do Cadeado (Parana, Brazil): Methodology and application for land management. Geografiska Annaler Series a-Physical Geography 97(2): 219–235.
Pemberton M (2001) Conserving geodiversity, the importance of valuing our geological heritage. Geological Society of Australia National Conference.
Pereira DI, Pereira P, Brilha J, et al. (2013) Geodiversity assessment of Parana State (Brazil): An innovative approach. Environmental Management 52(3): 541–552.
Pereira P, Pereira D, Santos L, et al. (2015) Quantification of a new water diversity index for large areas using GIS. Examples in Paraná State, Xingu river basin (Brazil) and Portugal, National Meeting of Cuaternario, Granada. Spanish Association for Estudio del Cuaternario (AEQUA).
Perotti L, Carraro G, Giardino M, et al. (2019) Geodiversity evaluation and water resources in the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Geopark (Italy). Water 11(10): 2102. DOI: 10.3390/w11102102
Pettersson M, Keskitalo ECH (2013) Adaptive capacity of legal and policy frameworks for biodiversity protection considering climate change. Land Use Policy 34(34): 213–222. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.03.007
Plan GA (2011) Geodiversity and geosystem services. Environmental Conservation 38(3): 271–274.
Prosser C (2013) Our rich and varied geoconservation portfolio: The foundation for the future. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 124(4): 568–580.
Radwanek-Bak B (2014) Geodiversity Assessment of the Rio Colca Valley and its Surrounding (Southern Peru) in the Context of Future Geopark. In: 14th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference SGEM. Albena, Bulgaria 2(5), p. 303–312.
Rose CR, Sutherland WJ, Amano T, et al. (2018) The major barriers to evidence-informed conservation policy and possible outcomes. Conservation Letters 11(5): 1–12.
Santos DS, Mansur KL, Goncalves JB, et al. (2017) Quantitative assessment of geodiversity and urban growth impacts in Armacao dos Buzios, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Applied Geography 85: 184–195.
Scarsi M, Crispini L, Malatesta C, et al. (2019) Geological map of a treasure chest of geodiversity: The Lavagnina Lakes Area (Alessandria, Italy). Geosciences 9(5): 229.
Seijmonsbergen AC, Guldenaar J, Rijsdijk KF (2017) Exploring Hawaiian long-term insular geodiversity dynamics. Landform Analysis 35: 31–43. DOI: 10.12657/landfana.035.007
Serrano E, Flano PR (2007) Geodiversity. A theoretical and applied concept [Geodiversite: Im concept theorique et un iiistriiineiit d’application]. Geographica Helvetica 62(3): 140–147.
Serrano E, Ruiz-Flano P (2007) Geodiversity: Concept, Assessment and Territorial Application. The Case of Tiermes-Caracena (Soria). Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles 45(45): 389–393.
Serrano E, Ruiz-Flaño P, Arroyo P (2009) Geodiversity assessment in a rural landscape: Tiermes-Caracena area (Soria, Spain). Memorie Descrittive Della Carta Geoligica d’Italia 87: 173–180.
Shannon C, Weaver W (1963) The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Sharples C (1993) A methodology for the identification of significant landforms and geological sites for geoconservation purposes. Technical Report. Hobart: Forestry Commission Tasmania.
Sharples C (1995) Geoconservation in Forest Management – Principles and Procedures. Tasforests, Forestry Tasmania, Hobart 7: 37–50.
Sharples C (2002) Concepts and Principles of Geoconservation. Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service. Version 3.
Silva J de P, Rodrigues C, Pereira DI (2015) Mapping and analysis of geodiversity indices in the Xingu River Basin, Amazonia, Brazil. Geoheritage 7(4): 337–350.
Silva JP, Pereira DI, Aguiar AM, et al. (2013) Geodiversity assessment of the Xingu drainage basin. Journal of Maps 9(2): 254–262.
Soms J (2017) Assessment of geodiversity as tool for environmental management of protected nature areas in South-Eastern Latvia. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific and Practical Conference, Vol. I, pp. 271–277. Rezekne, Latnia: Environment, Technology, Resources.
Stanley M (2001) Geodiversity Strategy. In: ProGEO News 1: 6–9.
Stepišnik U, Trenchovska A (2016) A proposal of quantitative geodiversity evaluation model on the example of Upper Pivka Karst, Slovenia. RAZPRAVE 46: 53–65.
Stepišnik U, Trenchovska A (2018) A new quantitative model for comprehensive geodiversity evaluation: The Škocjan Caves Regional Park, Slovenia. Geoheritage 10(1): 39–48.
Stuessy TF (2007) Evolution of specific and genetic diversity during ontogeny of island floras: The importance of understanding process for interpreting island biogeographic patterns. In: Ebach MC, Tangney RS (eds) Biogeography in a Changing World. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 117–133.
Thome MTC, Haddad CFB (2019) Brazil’s biodiversity researchers need help. Science 364(6446): 1144–1145.
Thomson DL, Conroy MJ, Anderson DR, et al. (2009) Standardising terminology and notation for the analysis of demographic processes in marked populations. Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations 3: 1099–1106.
Toivanen M, Hjort J, Heino J, et al. (2019) Is catchment geodiversity a useful surrogate of aquatic plant species richness? Journal of Biogeography 46(8): 1711–1722.
Whittaker RJ, Triantis KA, Ladle RJ (2008) A general dynamic theory of oceanic island biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 35(3): 977–994.
Xavier-da-Silva J, Persson VG, Lorini ML, et al. (2001) Indices de geodiversidade: Aplicaçõoes de SGI em estudos de biodiversidade. In: Garay I, Dias BFS (eds) (Orgs.) Conservaçõao da biodiversidade em ecossistemas tropicais: Avanços conceituais e revisõao de novas metodologias de avaliaçõao e monitoramento. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 299–316.
Yongxin D (2007) New trends in digital terrain analysis: Landform definition, representation, and classification. Progress in Physical Geography 31(4): 405–419.
Zandi R, Shafiei N (2019) Investigation and evaluation of geological diversity in Fahlyan Basin. Natural Resource Management, GIS & Remote Sensing 1(1): 9–20.
Zarnetske P, Read Q, Record S, et al. (2019) Towards connecting biodiversity and geodiversity across scales with satellite remote sensing. Global Ecology and Biogeography 28(5): 548–556.
Zwolinski Z (2004) Geodiversity. In: Goodie AS (ed) Encyclopedia of Geomorphology. London: Routledge, 417–418.
Zwolinski Z (2009) The routine of landform geodiversity map design for the Polish Carpathian Mountains. Landform Analysis 11: 77–85.
Zwolinski Z, Najwer A, Giardino M (2018) Methods for assessing geodiversity. In: Reynard E, Brilha J (eds) Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management. Elsevier, 27–52.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: November 11, 2020
Issue published: August 2021

Keywords

  1. Scientometric
  2. natural
  3. diversity
  4. geodiversity
  5. biodiversity
  6. assessment

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2020.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jake RA Crisp
School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Australia
Joanna C Ellison
School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Australia
Andrew Fischer
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Australia

Notes

Jake RA Crisp, School of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, 7250, Australia. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1413

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 40 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 24

  1. Identifying Optimal Cell Size for Geodiversity Quantitative Assessment with Richness, Diversity and Evenness Indices
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Quantifying Geodiversity at the Continental Scale: Limitations and Prospects
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Visages of geodiversity and geoheritage: a multidisciplinary approach to valuing, conserving and managing abiotic nature
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. Understanding trait diversity: the role of geodiversity
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. UNESCO Global Geoparks vs. Education: a 10-Year Bibliometric Analysis
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Quantitative Assessment of Spatial Pattern of Geodiversity in the Tibetan Plateau
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geological diversity fostering actions in geoconservation: An overview of Brazil
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geodiversity and Biodiversity
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Criteria for Selecting Areas to Identify Ecosystem Services Provided by Geodiversity: A Study on the Coast of São Paulo, Brazil
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geodiversity assessment to regional scale: Ecuador as a case study
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text