Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2005

Effect of Pedestrian-Related Factors on Intersection Performance

Abstract

The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) contains the national standard for installing and maintaining traffic control devices on all streets and highways. The 2003 MUTCD contains numerous corrections, revisions, and updates to the millennium edition (2000). One update is related to the definition of crossing distance at signalized intersections, where the crossing distance is extended to the far-side curb rather than the center of the farthest traffic lane. This study investigated the sensitivity of intersection performance to crossing distance and walking speed, critical constraints in the determination of the minimum green time. Three crossing distance standards and four walking speeds are considered. With Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) procedures, the impacts of the given crossing distance definitions and walking speeds on intersection operations were tested on two intersection configurations over a range of cycle lengths and traffic volumes. The effect on intersection performance was found to be most significant at low cycle lengths, in some instances with the delay increased manyfold. However, when cycle lengths were increased to account for the pedestrian constraints, optimal delay rarely increased by more than a few seconds. Additionally, as the discrepancy between the critical lane traffic volume on the main and cross streets was increased, the impact of pedestrian green times on vehicle delay also increased. It was seen that as the cycle length increased, pedestrian minimum green times no longer governed, so the impact of pedestrians on intersection performance became increasingly insignificant, often with a minimal impact on the optimal performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Abrams C. M., and Smith S. A. Selection of Pedestrian Signal Phasing. In Transportation Research Record 629, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 1–6.
2. Virkler M. R. Signal Coordination Benefits for Pedestrians. In Transportation Research Record 1636, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 77–82.
3. Tian Z. Z., Urbanik T., Engelbrecht R., and Balke K. Pedestrian Timing Alternatives and Impacts on Coordinated Signal Systems Under Split-Phasing Operations. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1748, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 46–54.
4. Hakkert A. S., and Ben-Yakov Y. Traffic Signal Design for Pedestrians on Divided Highways. ITE Journal, Vol. 55, No. 3, 1985, pp. 42–45.
5. Virkler M. R. Scramble and Crosswalk Signal Timing. In Transportation Research Record 1636, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 83–87.
6. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation. Overview of Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/kno-overview.htm. Accessed March 2004.
7. Highway Capacity Manual. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.
8. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2003.
9. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000.
10. Roess R. P., McShane W. R., and Prassas E. S. Traffic Engineering, 3rd ed. Prentice Hall, 2004.
11. Bowman B. L., and Vecellio R. L. Pedestrian Walking Speeds and Conflicts at Urban Median Locations. In Transportation Research Record 1438, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 67–73.
12. Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines. U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002.
13. Cottrell B. H. Jr., Guidelines for the Design and Placement of Curb Ramps. In Transportation Research Record 923, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1983, pp. 46–54.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2005
Issue published: January 2005

Rights and permissions

© 2005 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Hoe Kyoung Kim
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355.
Michael P. Hunter
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 790 Atlantic Drive, Atlanta, GA 30332-0355.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 13

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub