Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2005

Travel Effects of a Suburban Commuter Carsharing Service: CarLink Case Study

Abstract

Since 1998, carsharing organizations in the United States have experienced exponential membership growth, but to date there have been only a few evaluations of their effects on travel. Using the results of focus groups, interviews, and surveys, this paper examines the change in travel among members of CarLink–-a carsharing model in the San Francisco Bay Area, California, with explicit links to transit and suburban employment–-after approximately 1 year of participation. The demographic and attitudinal analyses of CarLink members indicated that the typical member (a) was more likely than an average Bay Area resident to be highly educated, in an upper income bracket, and professionally employed and (b) displayed sensitivity to congestion, willingness to try new experiences, and environmental concern. Some of the more important commuter travel effects of the CarLink programs included an increase in rail transit use by 23 percentage points in CarLink I and II; a reduction in driving without passengers by 44 and 23 percentage points in CarLink I and II, respectively; a reduction in average vehicle miles traveled by 23 mi in CarLink II and by 18 mi in CarLink I; an increase in travel time and a reduction in travel stress; a reduction in vehicle ownership by almost 6% in CarLink II; and reduced parking demand at participating train stations and among member businesses. The CarLink travel results are compared with those of neighborhood carsharing models in the United States and Europe.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Cervero R. Paratransit in America. Praeger, Westport, Conn., 1997.
2. Shaheen S., Sperling D., and Wagner C. Carsharing in Europe and North America: Past, Present, and Future. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 52, No. 3, 1998, pp. 35–52.
3. Katzev R. Car Sharing: A New Approach to Urban Transportation Problems. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2003.
4. Baum H., and Pesch S. Untersuchung der Eignung von Car-Sharing im Hinblick auf die Reduzierung von Stadtverkehrsproblemen (in German). Federal Ministry for Traffic, Bonn, Germany, 1994.
5. Harms S., and Truffer B. The Emergence of a Nation-wide Carsharing Co-operative in Switzerland. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland, 1998.
6. Meijkamp R., and Theunissen R. Carsharing: Consumer Acceptance and Changes in Mobility Behavior. Delft University of Technology Report, Delft, Netherlands, 1996.
7. Katzev R. CarSharing Portland: Review and Analysis of Its First Year. Department of Environmental Quality, Portland, Ore., 1999.
8. Cooper G., Howes D., and Mye P. The Missing Link: An Evaluation of CarSharing Portland Inc. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Portland, Ore., 2000.
9. Cervero R., and Tsai Y. City Carshare in San Francisco, California: Second-Year Travel Demand and Car Ownership Impacts. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1887, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 117–127.
10. Nerenberg V., Bernard M. J. III, and Collins N. E. Evaluation Results of San Francisco Bay Area Station-Car Demonstration. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1666, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 110–117.
11. Shaheen S., Wright J., Dick D., and Novick L. CarLink—A Smart Car-sharing System Field Test Report. UCD-ITS-RR-00–4, University of California, Davis, Calif., 2000.
12. Shaheen S., and Wright J. The CarLink II Pilot Program: Testing a Commuter-Based Carsharing Model. In Proc., 2001 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2001, pp. 1067–1072.
13. Shaheen S. Dynamics in Behavioral Adaptation to a Transportation Innovation: A Case Study of CarLink—A Smart Carsharing System. UCD-ITS-RR-99–16, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, 1999.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2005
Issue published: January 2005

Rights and permissions

© 2005 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Susan A. Shaheen
California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, University of California–Berkeley, 1357 South 46th Street, Building 452, Richmond, CA 94804-4648.
Caroline J. Rodier
California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways, University of California–Berkeley, 1357 South 46th Street, Building 452, Richmond, CA 94804-4648.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 97

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 27

  1. Resourcing idle privately owned autonomous electric vehicles: System d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Understanding the illegal charging intention of electric micro-mobilit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. An extended theory of planned behavior to explain the intention to use...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Measuring sentiments and attitude of people toward self-drive rental c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Acceptance of free-floating car sharing: A decomposed self-efficacy-ba...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Ridesharing as a Potential Sustainable Transportation Alternative in S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. What travel scenarios are the opportunities of car sharing?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. The cost of sharing bikes and docks: Quantifying rent and work require...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Shared Low-Speed Autonomous Vehicle System for Suburban Residential Ar...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Challenges in credibly estimating the travel demand effects of mobilit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Early adopters of Mobility-as-a-Service in the Netherlands
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Examining the impact of car-sharing on private vehicle ownership
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. La propensión al uso del coche compartido y sus bases decisionales. Re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Study on demand and characteristics of parking system in urban areas: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Service Operations of Electric Vehicle Sharing Systems from the Perspe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. To own or not to own? Car ownership and consumer awareness: Evidence f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. To Share or Not? A Critical View on Personal Mobility
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Exploring Factors Affecting Car Sharing Use Intention in the Southeast...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Carpooling and carsharing for commuting in the Paris region: A compreh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. A System of Shared Autonomous Vehicles Combined with Park-And-Ride in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. What Kind of People Use Carsharing for Commuting? Case Study in Shangh...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Computing and Visualizing Taxi Cab Dynamics as Proxies for Autonomous ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. What drives corporate carsharing acceptance? A French case study
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Multimodality: Facets and Causes of Sustainable Mobility Behavior
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Carsharing as Key Contribution to Multimodal and Sustainable Mobility ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Who is Attracted to Carsharing?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Carsharing and Station Cars in Asia: Overview of Japan and Singapore
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub